FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  How many team of the week

How many team of the week

Started by Saffolk 14 REPLIES230 VIEWS· 03 Sept 2014, 02:50
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 02:50
#1
03 Sept 2014, 02:50#1

Did lood make this s15 playing for a side mostly getting it's butt kicked. Pure class this kid

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
03 Sept 2014, 03:38
#2
03 Sept 2014, 03:38#2
Lazy bugger, who has had 40 minutes of shining in one test and has done bugger-all since and has cost us a try against Argentina.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
03 Sept 2014, 05:15
#3
03 Sept 2014, 05:15#3
Lomp made so many Tows he was second only the the other sloth Skelton....just a pity it was all hype.
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,294 posts
03 Sept 2014, 07:17
#4
03 Sept 2014, 07:17#4
Saffex if you can answer your own question and provide the examples. (unmh, just to clarify this is not your own team of the week list, it is ones with at least some credibility ).
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
03 Sept 2014, 07:36
#5
03 Sept 2014, 07:36#5
 Just a pity two of our resident morons cannot stand De Jager and wants the physically- deficient  Matfield in the team and now suddenly the lies about De Jager being "Lomp"  and Lazy is all over the site.
When some players are oin the TOW it is the real thing - with those they dislike it iis hype - can one ever  get two more dishonest buggers?

What clowns we have on this site!!!!!!
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
03 Sept 2014, 08:18
#6
03 Sept 2014, 08:18#6
Well  Cloudy I don't know any quotes about hype. But how about these:
Before there's tripe there is often hype
Time is not hype's friend
Never accept hype at face value
This year's Hype has many authors, last year's Hype has none.
You can't be popular arguing against hype  Hype is a disease of the new
There is optimism, credulity and hype, but the greatest confuser of them all is hype



MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
03 Sept 2014, 08:20
#7
03 Sept 2014, 08:20#7
oom I sense your confusion ..why not leave the thinking to others more capable?
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
03 Sept 2014, 08:58
#8
03 Sept 2014, 08:58#8
 Mozart
I can't leave the impossibles to rugby-illiterates like you and the other morons,   If you want to see h ype left to be twisted beyond recognition - that I can leave to you.  
Your defining of hype is accurate.  The biggest hype around rugby relates to Matfield and Alberts.  You say -
"Never accept hype at face value
This years Hype has many authors, last years Hype has none. "
Hopefully insofar as the mentioned two players are concerned - the second qu ote shall apply.   
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
03 Sept 2014, 16:32
#9
03 Sept 2014, 16:32#9

He made TOW more times than any other SA lock playing S15 this year.......not bad considering how poor his team was.

 

Class act this kid......better than Bakkies or Matfield at the same age  

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
03 Sept 2014, 16:50
#10
03 Sept 2014, 16:50#10
 Will any lock not be better than matfiled? Bakkies however was amazing. Had verything a lock should have. Wouldn' t say Lood is better at this age than Bakkies.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
03 Sept 2014, 16:50
#11
03 Sept 2014, 16:50#11

Etzebeth is ten times the player that Lomp is.....over hyped.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
04 Sept 2014, 01:04
#12
04 Sept 2014, 01:04#12
 Etzebeth is our best lock, lood a close second - he was terrific this s15, easily the best lock in the comp. Will have a long bok career thank goodness.
It's one of few good calls Meyer has made except for now selecting has been matfield to replace him - pathetic selection
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
04 Sept 2014, 02:04
#13
04 Sept 2014, 02:04#13
Matfield is a much stronger contributor than Lomp, the flat track bully. Up against aggressive opposition Lomp wilted...etzebeth by contrast became more aggressive. We don't need wilting locks.  
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
04 Sept 2014, 08:17
#14
04 Sept 2014, 08:17#14
 Mozartron
Matfield contributes to line outs - what else does he contribute to?   Bugger all - he does not wilt against stronger opposition - he just vanish from sight.    Better still all and sundry just push him out ofthe way.
So our dear resident moron said De Jager is a flat track bully because he tackles players backwards and it takes two to three players to bring him down when he carres balls?   
The moron gives players he does not like nicknames and try and make personal attacks on them as well.   That mostkly because of personal animosity.   Normally go that way if they threaten the useless geriatrics he supports.   
If anybody believes the member who tries to bully others on this site through personal attacks,  he or she must be nuts.  When it comes to rugby the moron is too thick for words    He is an outright liar and a fraud when it comes to rugby matters.    
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
04 Sept 2014, 12:25
#15
04 Sept 2014, 12:25#15
 How many Argentinians was Loodvoet able to tackle backwards?  In fact, he waved the scrumahlf, of all people, through to go and score. If you look at those images again, anybody can be excused for thinking that he could well have been looking the other way, pretending not to notice the danger. Unfortunately for him, Bismarck saw the danger and called him over to help close down the gap and then he had no choice but to commit to some kind  of effort.

He missed 6 flippin tackles against Arg and you are still raving about his defence. Do you realise that he missed more tackles against Argentina than what Morne has missed at Ellis Park? At least Morne made more tackles than what he missed. In fact, Morne made more tackles at Ellis Park than what Loodvoet made in Arg. What is more important is the fact that many of the tackles by Morne where against bigger men than himself. How many of those Argentinians are bigger than Loodvoet. Hy is 'n pissie. Seems like he is indeed a flat track bully.


— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news