FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  How will the referees influence the Super Rugby semi-finals?; the ROAR BY Ben Gibbon

How will the referees influence the Super Rugby semi-finals?; the ROAR BY Ben Gibbon

Started by Just_win3 REPLIES102 VIEWS· 24 Jul 2014, 09:56
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
24 Jul 2014, 09:56
#1
24 Jul 2014, 09:56#1

Whether you like it or not, the 2014 Super Rugby season, in particular, has been one ruled by referees – and they will again play their role in the competition semi-finals.

The on-field officiating duties have been bifurcated between Glen Jackson and Jaco Peyper respectively, both seasoned officials with very different styles and judicial approaches to the game. Consequently, as much as the four sides competing on the weekend will have to play their opponent, they will also have to play the referee.

This is most significant for game two under the guidance of Peyper. The Waratahs and Brumbies will have to be clinical at the breakdown and, in particular, the set piece. Peyper has averaged 19 scrum resets per game this season – and appears content to award penalties and resets alike.

This could be significant in the latter stages of the game as clock management becomes an issue.

The South African-born referee is also noted as a frequent ‘momentum shifter’ – and does use his regulatory power to alter a game’s dynamic from one side to another. Such refereeing intervention prompted Lions’ head coach Johan Ackermann to ask for clarity on certain questionable calls during the side’s loss to the Sharks in Durban.

Wallabies fans may also remember a ‘no try’ call and Ma’a Nonu shoulder charge that went unpunished in the sides 15th consecutive loss to the All Blacks. Waratahs supporters who follow referees closely may be nervous after hearing that Peyper has been appointed to officiate the second semi-final – the side has an unfavourable record with him on the field.

Moreover, with noted whistle-blower Craig Joubert acting as assistant referee, the officiating body could materially influence the all-Australian semi-final.

Conversely, Glen Jackson, a Saracens centurion and Barbarian, who will be refereeing the Crusaders vs. Sharks game is widely regarded to favour the attacking side, in doing so, erring on the side of positive rugby.

This will benefit contrasting aspects for both sides. After the Sharks set-piece annihilation of the Highlanders the Sharks will favour their scrum and will look to be afforded concession on the basis of positive, attacking set piece play. If they play to their game, this could be worth quite a bit if the Crusaders concede penalties in their 45 metre zone.

Contrastingly, the Crusaders backs will benefit from the attacking game the Jackson likes to govern. Ultimately, as Jackson is less inclined to throw his weight around the opening semi-final in New Zealand should be dictated by the players, rather than the men in pink.

The Super Rugby finals thus far have been an incredible spectacle – hopefully, that form continues.

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
24 Jul 2014, 10:07
#2
24 Jul 2014, 10:07#2
Conclusion on the sharks v Saders game regarding reffing:
"Ultimately, as Jackson is less inclined to throw his weight around the opening semi-final in New Zealand should be dictated by the players, rather than the men in pink."
We certainly hope so but we know some posters will be bleating regardless of the fairness of the ref. Some have already started & the ball hasn't even been kicked off. 
Beeno: I wonder what you considered opinion on this matter is?

The JW Mole Detection Agency©: "we are on your case"
An affiliated company with franchises throughout the world.  Employment opportunities are available. Apply now!!
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
24 Jul 2014, 10:34
#3
24 Jul 2014, 10:34#3
 JW sad to say but the chance of the Sharks getting a fair deal from the nz ref are almost NIL. I am with Dr Tucker and Mallet on this one. 
Any realistic assessment must come to this conclusion and no amount of calling it bleating will alter the facts.
I only hope that if the Sharks do get shafted the whole process of just how Jackson was appointed is investigated and explained and he is severely disciplined.But who knows - with articles like those re Dr Tucker and comments by Mallet etc and widespread comments and practically universal agreement that it is absurd that an nz ref is offciating - perhaps Glen knows he could end his career ala bryce lawrence if he goes too far or is too blatant. How to win the game for the crusties could be a bit trcicky but given the laws of rugby still realtively easy.
What a pity we have to consider the ref above all factors when specualting who will win!!!! The solution is easy work towards baning all bent refs.

BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
24 Jul 2014, 12:45
#4
24 Jul 2014, 12:45#4
... Bean Brain don't worry mate,.. I'm sure the yarpy that refs the final between the Crusaders and the Warratahs/ Brumbies will have already decided the winner and it won't be the Kiwis ...Crusties haven't got a snowballs chance in hell against a yarpy ref...so I'm pretty sure you still will have the last laugh...
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news