FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Hurricanes Vs Highlanders: The Stats

Hurricanes Vs Highlanders: The Stats

Started by 3ku12 REPLIES111 VIEWS· 17 May 2014, 11:15
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
3K
3ku1Pro2,580 posts
17 May 2014, 11:15
#1
17 May 2014, 11:15#1

 



                                Attack:


Hurricanes:                         Highlanders:


Trys = 1.                              Trys: 0


Metres = 528.                     Metres = 262


Carries = 161.                     Carries = 101


Defenders Beaten = 24.    DB= 20


Clean Breaks = 13.            CB= 2


Passes = 159.                    Passes = 94


Offloads = 10.                    Offloads = 4


Turnovers Conceded = 16 TC = 13


Hurricanes dominated all stats on attack, 

other then conceding the most turnovers, 

which is ultimatley why they lost. These are 

typical stats from canes, made all the 

oppurtunities on attack, and stats say 

Canes should of scored more then 16. But 

due to the Landers great defense, Canes

inability to be proficient, and change their 

gameplan and stick to their structures like 

they have been doing so well, ultimatley 

lead to a Canes side who just fell short, they 

also left 16 possible points on the feild, two

missed kicks from Taylor, and try 

disallowed to Dixon. Both teams also,

conceded way too many turnovers with 

Canes conceding 16 and Landers 13. You 

cannot expect to build momentum and 

phases, without regular possession. Canes 

inability to adapt to the conditions, and 

change their gameplan too. Just shows how 

competitive the NZ Conf is, with those stats 

againgst weaker defensive sides like some

SA and Oz sides  they would of wan. 


                            Defense:


Hurricanes:                                   Highlanders:


Tackles Made = 112                   TM = 164


Tackles Missed = 20                  TM = 24


Turnovers Wan = 8                      TW = 6


Stats say it all Landers had to make alot 

more tackles then Canes, as they were 

basically defending in their own half most of 

the game. Canes wan more turnovers, both 

teams missed way too many tackles, Canes 

missed 20. Although Canes conceded no 

trys, which is good they also conceded 6 

Turnovers, at crucial times. Defense wan the 

game.


                                     Kicks:


Hurricanes:                        Highlanders:

Kicks = 26                          Kicks = 27


Con = 1/1 (100%)             Con = 0/0 (100%)


Pen = 3/5 (60%)                Pen = 5/5 (100%)


D/G = 0/0 (0%)                  D/G = 1/1 (100%)


Landers had a far supeior kicking game, in 

the first half Canes did, with Barratts very 

accurate kicking game, his up and unders 

were deadly. Momentum was going Canes 

way, but once Barratt was taken off, Canes lacked direction, particularly in their kicking 

game. Landers goal kickers were far 

supeior, Parker converting all penalties into 

points. Where as once Barratt went off, 

Taylor missed two crucial kicks at goal


                                 Breakdown:


Hurricanes:                                Highlanders:  


Rucks Wan = 101                  Rucks Wan = 72


Rucks Lost = 3                       Rucks Lost = 5


Rucks Wan = 97.4 %             RW= 93.5%


Mauls Wan = 4                       MW= 1


Stats show Canes dominated the 

breakdown battle, winning more rucks and more mauls then Landers. Which has been 

a continuation of the Canes supeirority at 

part of the game. With all their domination 

at the breakdown, they diddnt convert it into enough points.



.                                 Set Piece:


Hurricanes:                           Highlanders:         


Lineouts Wan = 8                 LW= 13


Lineouts Lost = 5                 LL = 2


Lineouts Wan = 61.5%        LW = 86.7%


Scrums Wan = 1                  Scrums Wan= 9


Scrums Lost = 1                  Scrums Lost = 0


Scrums = 50.0%                   Scrums = 100%



Another problem for the Canes was the set peices. Landers dominated the lineouts and scrums. Not good enough, Matu hd a pretty good game, but really struggled throwing in the lineouts, a few not straight. Canes also only wan one scrum and lost one, on contrast Landers wan all 9 scrums. Toomaga-Allen particularly struggled at scrum time. If they want to be title contenders or even playoff contenders, they need to sort out their set pieces.



                                   Disciplin:


Hurricanes:                           Highlanders:


Penalties Conc= 10.           Penalties Conc= 9


Red= 0.                                 Red=0


Yellow=0.                             Yellow=0


Both teams disciplin were pretty bad, but Canes conceded more penalties. Too many penalties conceded, highlighted by 15 of the Landers coming from the penalties concedes by the Canes, Dixon particularly infringement at the base of the ruck cost Canes dearly 


Canes really need to improove if they want to beat Chiefs let alone be in the playoffs, they may have let all the hype get to them. Need to focus on the basics, structures and core roles like they have done previousley, and the trys well come. And with Landers back in playoff contention, but they also missed a ton of tackles, and conceded alot of penalties. Their defense was exceptional and really wan them game, but they need to be more creative on attack, they put no trys againgst the canes. With Saders next it doesent get any easier. 



JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
17 May 2014, 11:32
#2
17 May 2014, 11:32#2
Great post 3ku1. I only saw parts of the game yesterday but will  watch the full game as soon as the download finishes. I like both teams but was hoping for the Canes to win. Landers have come back from the abyss  (last few seasons have been crap but I always thought they were better than they showed). Now they have a well balanced team.
Canes looked like they finally had balance & could go all the way. From what you say, when Barrett went off that was the difference in the game. Not surprised. Landers were playing with their backup fly-half but he is a goo d one. 
3K
3ku1Pro2,580 posts
17 May 2014, 19:00
#3
17 May 2014, 19:00#3
 Yep to win Super Rugby you need a Good-Great Flyhalve. Barratt going off just showed how much they rely on Barratt, kinda like Chiefs and Cruden. Chiefs have cover though with Anscombe whos doing really well, canes really were exposed in this area. They have no depth at ten, wheres the cover, why was bateman covering ten. Could even look at Hammetts 5-3 Split, no First Five cover. Back cover were Smylie, Leiua, and i think Proctor. If Barratt goes down, who steps up, big issue. Canes mathmaticallt still got a shot, but even if they do make the playoffs, they have really faltered under pressure the past few weeks, which is really dissapointing as in their games agsingst Saders, Bulls, And Blues. They did really well in converting pressure into points. Canes well be desperate at home, Chiefs coming off a bye, the loss is dissapointing but when you think only 2 pt loss to a top kiwi side, draw is just unfodtunate. If they can get a BP win over the Chiefs sorry haha, that puts them to 2nd place in NZ conference and still in the hunt, but destiny is out of their hands.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news