I enjoyed this

Comparing Eben Etzebeth, RG Snyman, and Lood de Jager in terms of power style and physical dominance actually reveals why Etzebeth looks and feels like a different breed altogether.

Let’s break it down clearly:

Eben Etzebeth — The Enforcer

Estimated size: 2.03 m | ~127–130 kg (realistic playing weight)

Power profile: Explosive brute force

1. Contact dominance: Etzebeth is built like a tank — shorter torso relative to height, broad chest, thick neck and legs. His hits have a thud sound that echoes — players bounce off him.
2. Body shape: Dense, compact muscle with minimal fat — he’s almost linebacker-built for a 2 m player.
3. Style: Looks for confrontation — loves collisions, counter-rucks, and close-quarter aggression. He’s the Springboks’ emotional and physical tone-setter.
4. Strength: Probably the most powerful lock pound-for-pound in world rugby. He doesn’t just absorb tackles — he wins them.
5. Dominance type: Psychological and physical intimidation. You feel him before you see him.

Closest historical comparison: Bakkies Botha (but faster and more explosive).

RG Snyman — The Athletic Giant

Estimated size: 2.06 m | ~130–132 kg

Power profile: Elastic athleticism

1. Contact dominance: He’s got power but spreads it over more frame length — less impact per square inch. His hits aren’t as concussive as Etzebeth’s but still formidable.
2. Body shape: Taller, longer, leaner muscle build — looks almost like a hybrid between a lock and a basketball forward.
3. Style: Uses mobility, timing, and agility — great offloading, line-out work, and defensive reads.
4. Strength: High core strength and excellent functional power, but not as “thick” through the upper body as Etzebeth.
5. Dominance type: Dynamic athleticism. He dominates in the air and in open play, not in collisions per se.

Closest comparison: Victor Matfield — if Matfield had 10 kg more and offloading flair.

Lood de Jager — The Technical Workhorse

Estimated size: 2.06 m | ~125–127 kg

Power profile: Engine and intelligence

1. Contact dominance: Efficient rather than devastating. He doesn’t smash — he disrupts and cleans with precision.
2. Body shape: More upright, less dense — long legs, less muscle definition in shoulders and arms.
3. Style: Outstanding line-out technician, clever maul reader, and tireless ruck worker.
4. Strength: High endurance strength — rarely fatigues — but less raw explosion than Etzebeth or Snyman.
5. Dominance type: Technical and positional dominance. Wins through craft and work rate.

Closest comparison: John Eales (though less skilled with ball-in-hand).

So in simple terms:

1. Etzebeth hurts you.
2. Snyman outmaneuvers you.
3. De Jager outworks you.

Interesting….cant say I agree that de Jager doesn’t fatigue. But spot on re Etzebeth and Snyman.

Yeah definitely applicable to Mostert and Nortje though

Franco Mostert – Physical/Power Profile

1. Weight: ~112–115 kg
2. Height: 1.98 m
3. Power impact: Moderate
4. Mostert isn’t a dominant collision player — he’s not the guy who wins the contact, but rather one who never loses it.
5. He absorbs hits and makes his tackles, but rarely dents the gainline or folds carriers backward like Etzebeth or Snyman.
6. His strength lies in relentless repeat efforts — high tackle volume, work in the trenches, maul graft, and second-man cleans.
7. He brings “attrition” rather than “impact.”

Verdict:

He’s a grinder, not a wrecking ball — his “power” is in endurance and consistency, not explosive force.

If Etzebeth is a sledgehammer, Mostert is a buzzsaw — he’ll wear you down, not blow you up.

Ruan Nortje – Physical/Power Profile

1. Weight: ~112–115 kg
2. Height: 2.00 m
3. Power impact: Light-to-moderate
4. Nortje is athletic and mobile, but his physical dominance is limited. He doesn’t impose himself at the gainline or rucks.
5. His strength is agility, speed to rucks, lineout craft, and link play — more of a continuity and momentum lock, not a bruiser.
6. Against big packs (France, England, Ireland), he can get neutralised physically unless paired with a true enforcer.

Verdict:

He’s more of a tempo and technical lock. Smart, dynamic, and high work rate, but lacks the pure physical intimidation and mass Bok systems are built on.

In a Bok system

South Africa’s lock blueprint thrives on power pairing:

1. One brute-force lock (Etzebeth/Snyman/Vermaak)
2. One engine/technical lock (Mostert/Nortje/Ludwig)

So while Mostert and Nortje don’t bring the same raw power, they fit the balance model — provided the other lock brings that heavy-hitting presence.

In short:

1. Mostert – durable grinder; power = endurance and aggression, not mass.
2. Nortje – athletic technician; power = speed and precision, not collisions.
3. Neither can anchor a Bok pack’s physical identity — they complement it, not define it.

Sounds gay as fuck

These days Eben is less of a sledgehammer and more of a wet sponge.

Sorry to say but it's true. He's pretty anonymous these days, a few metres off the pace at any given time.

Accurate assessment of our locks. Would have thought Nortje is a bigger lock than Mostert. Better in the outs with a huge engine.

Nortje play 80 minutes and you need at least one other 80 minute player and ideally three. Du Toit is an 80 minute player and probably Wiese as well. Eben if absolutely necessary.

I don't think Rooitwit has ever liked Eben as he is a bit on the rough side like Bakkies who he also didn't like.

Rooitwit likes forwards like Luke Watson rather than Schalk Burger, and locks like Albert Van Der Berg. Hahahahaha.

"Sounds gay as fuck"

.

"I don't think Rooitwit has ever liked Eben as he is a bit on the rough side like Bakkies who he also didn't like."

I've never been a fan of Eben's tendency to get involved in everything - sometimes running half the length of the field just to be part of the handbags - or his tough-guy posturing . . . but I've always rated him as a player . . . until this season when he looks a spent force.

As for me not rating Bakkies, that is just a blatant lie based on the fact that I once rightly criticised his head butt on Jimmy Cowan . . . making Baboon-ou soil his frilly pink panties. Always rated Bakkies and felt he didn't get enough recognition while all the praise always went to Matfield . . . who was also a great Springbok lock (before Baboon-ou starts mouthing off about Matfield in exactly the same way that Moffie mouths off about PSdT).

Just keeping things real.

Draad I’ve just started watching Mad Men

Yeah it’s been a while since Eben has had a big game

Needs one tomorrow

Maybe it's just playing for the Sharks that Eben has let it slide . . . and he wouldn't be the only Sharks player to play poorly this season . . . but even his last few test matches have been underwhelming.

Hope he does come good because while we have a few options for the #5 jersey, we're a bit thin at #4.

"Draad I’ve just started watching Mad Men"

Mostert – durable grinder

Hahahahaha

Definitely gay as fuck

1. Power impact: Light-to-moderate

pound-for-pound

: K ;-)

‘Sounds gay as fuck’

About sums up your grasp of rugby in general

RooinekHall Of Famer

16,114 posts

Nov 07, 2025, 12:48

"I don't think Rooitwit has ever liked Eben as he is a bit on the rough side like Bakkies who he also didn't like."

I've never been a fan of Eben's tendency to get involved in everything - sometimes running half the length of the field just to be part of the handbags - or his tough-guy posturing . . . but I've always rated him as a player

……..

No you haven’t, here’s your summary of him last year:

Eben is comprehensively outplayed by PSdT for about the 15th or 16th consecutive game and gets subbed after botching the try and yet another average performance and not a peep from the PSdT bashers.

…..

’another average performance’ …..says it all.

Almost as ridiculous as your take on PSDT....

DB you’re full of Shit!

Db’s loyalties are to the volk. He’ll even make common cause with Rhonda who has humiliated him for 20 years if it helps an argument in favor of the volk.

Ai jaai jaai DB …..how low can you go?? Rhonda of all people, sies…..:)

It is true though - Rooi’s take on Eben is on par with some on here’s ignorant take on PSDT

At least Rooi rates Eben as a player

Nope Rhonda doesn’t….called his performances ‘average’. If you want ignorant that’s ignorant.

This is what he said about Eben

‘but I've always rated him as a player . . . until this season when he looks a spent force.‘

So he definitely rates him

Mad Men magnificent ... 7series 92 episodes

Yes really good

Have you watched Black Rabbit?

That’s what he is saying today because it suits him….the quote I provided was from last year:

Eben is comprehensively outplayed by PSdT for about the 15th or 16th consecutive game and gets subbed after botching the try and yet another average performance and not a peep from the PSdT bashers.

That’s a direct quote. Rhonda lead the accusations of assault against Eben supposedly at Langebaan. I can never remember him making one complimentary comment about him.

Time to accept that….just as he never said one thing positive about Schalk….in fact called him Skulk and claimed he couldn’t break tackles.

Sound familiar….the hypocrisy about Dud Toit stinks up the site.

I think there is one problem with Etzebeth performances and that relates to the fact that he was totally out of rugby for 4 months due to concussion problems this year. That type of injury is often career-ending - but in the case it looks like he got over it - but from what I have seen he is not back yet to the level he used to perform.

It is clear that he should up his game in the test tomorrow for the benefit of the team - but there are adequate support in place - since Etzebeth can be replaced by Snyman and De Jager by Du Toit if the need arises, Although that may fill a gap at lock it could leave a problem in the loosies set up,