Rooinek.
Firstly, calling someone out on evidence is a totally different thing than going around calling people insulting names just because you dont have the ability to stick to an adult conversation or are incapable of having such conversation without the use of crude language.
I am just stating evidence. I also don't have that large of an ego that I am unwilling to appologise to anyone if I have insulted them, it happens we are human.
But to answer your question, there is a HUGE difference. The one is socially accpetable the other is not. I am not insulting in that context. I am providing facts.
Just an addition:
Maybe if i painted a picture my point would get across better:
Scenario 1:
We all sit in a boardroom waitning for a meeting. Beeno (Beeno, just using you as an example not intentionally aimed at you) walks in. Here knocks off a few crude words. we sit down the meeting starts. every idea that he doesn't agree with he shouts down and calls the innitiator an idiot. How many people are actually going to listen to him the day he comes up with a great idea?
Scenario 2:
We sit in the boardroom. Beeno walks in, he greets everybody in a freindly fashion. the meeting goes on. He disagrees on some points clerly states why others don't agree with him. He has made his point though. Next time he comes up with a great Idea. How many people will actually listen to him.
The point of the little scenario is that behaviour creates credibility. Some of the behaviour I have seen (and this is not just restricted to here) creates a rather bleak outlook on firstly the credibility of said person as well as his/her social social interaction.
From there the outlook. In the hope that it creates personal growth.