SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
17 Oct 2017, 20:35#1
about the AB side we last played lacking key players.......bullshit......the only player they were really missing was Retallick.......for the rest, the current players are better.
As good as old man Smith is at 15, McKenzie is better. Ioane and Milner Skuder are far far better than Dagg
Franks is no longer the best tighthead in NZ, the youngsters are adding better value
We should have beaten NZ......we created 3 tries they only created 1......a charge down and intercept are soft touches
17 Oct 2017, 22:49#2
Be careful. You are coming very close to sounding like Beeno, who is sometimes capable of trying to convince us that his side actually won the game despite the scoreboard saying otherwise.
DEDenny
Captain12,893 posts
18 Oct 2017, 01:48#3
Should have, could have, would have....yawn. The Boks lost, it's what the scoreboard says, if it wasn't a depleted AB side then at least admit we lost to a side fatigued by travel. I can't imagine the same effort by a Bok side if the situation was reversed. The Boks had their best chance to win but they blew that opportunity which is enough to suggest that there's still a lot wrong with Bok rugby.
I'd rather believe in what Campese has to say, he knows, he's been there and is a legend of the game, not a pretender who barks and who's never had a single cheer from a single supporter.
18 Oct 2017, 01:56#4
True that Denny ,and unlike some on thi s forum we actually value our senior players ,the prize doesnt always go to the swiftest !
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
18 Oct 2017, 04:48#5
Yep, very true WD. But SA fans don’t get it...it’s the flavour of the day syndrome.
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
18 Oct 2017, 10:07#6
Well said Saffex. Some guys here are so dumb they think the only indication of how a side has performed is the scoreboard. Yes its incredibly stupid I know.Of course the Boks deserve to have won the game as they were clearly the better side. Unfortunately some weasels are too scared to say what is obvious.
The wee abs and their fellow travelers complain bitterly that their team wasn't at full strength and hence the Boks dominating the game. However they easily forget the Boks were not a merit selected squad of 23.Saffex your independence of mind is a breath of fresh air!!! One has to dismiss ou cerudunce windpomp ridiculous staement - not the firs t one I must add.
No the deluded oaks saying the Boks can never improve and the abs were the better side in the recent test must be dismissed jokers Bwahahhahahahahahaha
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
18 Oct 2017, 10:44#8
Admit One you kamp SS troll I suppose you think that is a convincing argument. Bwahahhahahaha I love it when these nutjobs make the case against themsel ves.
18 Oct 2017, 10:53#9
Admit one is that beandork in the second pic ?Obviously he hasnt finished evolving yet eh ?
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
18 Oct 2017, 11:13#10
Warped DUD only the most idiotic moron would believe in macro evolution as I PROVED some time ago. I still laugh at how ou rootwit and all the resident God haters here sailed into the topic so confidently and had their arguments so easily blown up. Evolution is like believing that the world is flat. Hahahahhahahahahaha that was a great time.
By they end they had been pretty much silenced. Admit One ha s just made an ASS of himself in more ways than one.
18 Oct 2017, 13:33#11
Beeno, you did not convince anyone of anything. Just because you copied and pasted a bunch idiotic arguments does not mean you've proved anything. You can't proclaim victory when not one person on this site has agreed with your argument. Science continually backs up evolution. The holes in the 5-8 thousand year old earth theory are so blatant its actually embarrassing.
RORooinek
Captain18,117 posts
RORooinekCaptain18,117 posts
18 Oct 2017, 13:39#12
blue, in Baboon-ou's mind he wins every debate on this forum by destroying contrary arguments with eloquent reason and cast-iron logic.
That's only in his own little mind of course. Everyone else thinks he's a delusional half-wit.
JWJust_win
Captain18,570 posts
JWJust_winCaptain18,570 posts
18 Oct 2017, 23:14#13
Beeno your unbounded enthusiasm is evident yet again, unbounded by logic, sanity or facts. Still there is always hope... one must remain optimistic.
Admit one, your post is over the top mate.
BEBeeno1
Captain40,032 posts
BEBeeno1Captain40,032 posts
19 Oct 2017, 15:19#14
The holes in the 5-8 thousand year old earth theory are so blatant its actually embarrassing. BLUEBOK IF YOU IMAGINE I WAS INSISTING ON A 5-8 THOUSAND YEAR PERIOD OF THE EARTHS EXISTENCE THEN YOU CLEARLY DIDN'T READ THE MATERIAL I POSTED AND HENCE, LIKE SOME OTHERS HERE, DON'T EVEN KNOW THEY LOST THE DEBATE HANDS DOWN. ONLY A GULLIBLE SIMPLETON OR RABID IDEOLOGUE WOULD EVER THIN MACRO EVOLUTION COULD BE TRUE. ITS A TOTAL JOKE. ALWAYS REMEMBER OAKS GOD HAS SAID - THE FOOL HAS SAID IN HIS HEART THERE IS NO GOD. ATHEISTS ARE BY DEFINITION FOOLS IT SADDENS ME TO SAY !
OU ROOITWIT OTHER THEN OFFERING INSULTS OFFERED NOTHING MUCH ELSE AND SO IT WAS AN EASY WIN FOR BEENO. DEAR OLD SHARKBOK FELT COMPELLED TO TELL US ALL THAT CHRIST WAS CRUCIFIED ON CHRISTMAS DAY AND MANY DISTINGUISHED THEMSELVES BY THERE SHEER IGNORANCE. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA BUT AT LEAST THEY TRIED! IT WAS GREAT QUOTING ANTONY FLEW FORMER WORLD'S LEADING ATHEIST SAYING THE INFORMATION LED HIM TO GOD. TRUE SEEKERS WILL BY GOD'S GOOD GRACE COME TO THE TRUTH. SCOFFERS AND MOCKERS REMAIN IN THEIR VERY FOOLISH STATE.