If Sacha had landed his kicks

It would have been 40-17

Taking the last two kicks at goal was idiocy to start off with. The Boks had superiority up front and it should have been corner kicks and the score would have been 48-17.

Kicking at goal at thatn stage of the match was idiocy supreme anyway. In the second half with only 14 players on the ground they scored 19 points

In any event the French used corner kicks with one exception. I was shocked when I saw we were back to Meyer and White idiocy when the last two kicks at goal took place, In the second half NO penalty KINKS by the Springboks took palce and w know what that produced.

why look for the negative?

No negative it’s just a case of how much we could have thrashed them by

It was what I would call positive decisions. To my mind scoring of tries are superior to kicking at goal. If nothing works with scoring of tries then try goal kicking - not the other way around,

It was what I would call positive decisions. To my mind scoring of tries are superior to kicking at goal. If nothing works with scoring of tries then try goal kicking - not the other way around,