FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Invest in Lambie?

Invest in Lambie?

Started by Beeno14 REPLIES272 VIEWS· 27 Aug 2013, 12:50
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
27 Aug 2013, 12:50
#1
27 Aug 2013, 12:50#1

Ex Keo 

The fullback experience of Pat Lambie must be trusted to start against the Australians in Brisbane.

 

Willie le Roux had a shocker in Mendoza (Rubbish that is overstating it!) but I’d start him on the right wing and move Bryan Habana back to his favoured left wing. Bjorn Basson has pace and is good under the high ball but he has always struck me as a good Super Rugby player but not quite there at Test level.(Agreed)

The back three axis can be improved and I believe Lambie’s calm, combined with Habana being Habana and Le Roux’s play-making ability makes for a greater threat.(Not a bad idea Keo)

JJ Engelbrecht is another whose defensive decision-making let him down against The Pumas. His conversion from wing to outside centre has shown growth but the one area he continues to struggle with is his defensive decision-making. It again proved erratic in Mendoza. 

Jan Serfontein may be a consideration against the Wallabies. If he does not start then I at least hope he will get more game time.

Another consideration could be to play Engelbrecht on the wing, use Le Roux in an impact role and start with Serfontein at No 13.

Jano Vermaak should also get a start ahead of Ruan Pienaar. Vermaak’s speed to the breakdown and different style is more suited than Pienaar to the fast paced Brisbane surface.(Agreed)

Willem Alberts, if selected, needs a big performance and not just a 20-minute cameo and Juandre Kruger needs an overall. Kruger is the player who controls the Bok lineout but his physicality doesn’t match his rugby intellect and when the going gets a bit tough he tends to get going … like in out of there.(at Juandre 110  kg is lightweigt - he is however more physical that the 106 kg string bean matfield who fooled so many for so long)

Beast is another who too often in the past two seasons has traded more on the spectator chant of ‘BEAST’ than making an impact. I wouldn’t start with him. (Agreed he simply doesnt work hard enough end of story)

Brisbane is also the Test that should see the return to the starting XV of Bismarck du Plessis.(Either one against oz s fine by me)

The performance in Mendoza wasn’t good enough and expect several changes for the battle in Brisbane.

Yes Oz loosing 2 now will also be desparate. But if we play well we can definitely win. It will be inreseting to see who Meyer Selects. Deon Fourie would be geat to have in the squad with Louw at 7 two fetchers and a more pacy loose trio. Vermulen at 8 -this guy really puts in the hard donkey work. 

Re Deon Fourie - apart from lineouts no sa loose forward has his all round skills set. I am very interested in Wilie Brits's development. One had to sit up and take note of that pace, skill and reasonable size.

So many quality young players coming through. If only we can keep them and get our house in order etc


KA
KalaedFreddieClub Pro495 posts
27 Aug 2013, 13:34
#2
27 Aug 2013, 13:34#2

Willy on the front-foot may be good but Saturday he fell apart like a luckypacket china-toy.  Lambie is a better (less flashy) full back and should make that posie his.

 

Deon fourie has developed into a good fetcher and opportunistic player - he may not have the size but sometimes you need more kop and less size.

 

Vermaak is much-much better than Ruan on any given day and JJ is like a Ferrari - quick but cannot crash.. He tackles like my sister.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
27 Aug 2013, 13:37
#3
27 Aug 2013, 13:37#3
Beeno Whenever are you going to stop quoting idiotic articles from keo - and hope for a reasonable comment. Lets get own to facts and those are loud and clear. The article starts with the assumption that the French clubs players would be back in the squad - and knowing the braindead involved, they might well be. However, there are some other assumptions as well that really is looking for disaster. You are probably pushing this article because it refer to Fourie. Just one question - how many penalties have Fourie given away in his last three games? I will answer for you - it was a round figure of 10 penalties. It actually can mean he has donated so many points and advantages to the opposition - it really is unbelievanle. There is NO WAY that a player like that could be included in any squad. So put that one directly out of your mind - at best he is a questionable Super 15 player - definitely not a dependable loosie. To substantiate this one - you have to look at how he performed in Super 15 - where he played half his games at hooker. Fourie is a buy player - but he has positives as well as negatives. Positives : Ball carries = 71 (64) Possession Turnover = 20 (14) Line Breaks = 6 (4) Negatives Tackles made = 81 (264) Penalties = 15 (7) Possession lost = 20 (7) To see the above context I am giving you in brackets the figures of Labuschagne The above shows that although Fourie can look good - there are elements of his game (defence, Penalties and possession losses) which is sub-par. Fact is his average number of tackles per game in Super 15 was 5 - which is definitely not good enough for a loosie. That being said - I fail to understand some of the other statements made in the article as well -o ne of which relates to a 20 minute cameo by Alberts. When did that 20 minute cameo happen? Definitely not in any of the tests he played in since June 2012. He is a loosie with even worse tackle stats than Fourie - his line-out performance is zero and his ball carries resulted in minimal ground gained and the next maul. Ball handling skills poor as well. The statement about cameo performance comprises nice-sounding words without any substance. His immobility was clearly illustrated in the Soweto test last year - where he went AWOL and during the whole game did not carry the ball once and made 1 tackle. We are infor the same bit in the coming two tests. The above are just two points to clarify the issue. The other statements are generally in line with conventional thinking - bar it is time to get rid of Morne Steyn - not mentioned - but in France at this stage. He brings nothing bar goal kicking to the game - for the rest his kicking and passing games are putrid.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
27 Aug 2013, 13:37
#4
27 Aug 2013, 13:37#4
Sorry - duplication
CA
carpetmuncherPro1,667 posts
27 Aug 2013, 14:49
#5
27 Aug 2013, 14:49#5

count on the cocainie enraged stripper loving keo to make shit stained remarks on corporate media. i do find it rather ironic that beeno keeps on reposting a reporter that has zero credabilty . lambie should replace morne steyn yes nothing wrong with le roux.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news