FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Irish Media: Best Bok Side in 20 Years

Irish Media: Best Bok Side in 20 Years

Started by sharkbok12 REPLIES471 VIEWS· 04 Nov 2014, 16:26
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,293 posts
04 Nov 2014, 16:26
#1
04 Nov 2014, 16:26#1
Best Bok side in 20 years’
  • 04 Nov 2014
 827  58

.

What the Irish newspapers are saying ahead of the Test in Dublin on Saturday.

‘Best-ever Boks have embraced a nation’s history of revolution,’ screams a headline in today’sIrish Daily Mail. Hugh Farrelly talks about how far South Africa has come as a nation, and then as a rugby team. Farrelly writes that Meyer has ‘realised that forward strength and precision place-kicking are no longer enough and he has brought through talents like Willie le Roux and Handré Pollard to provide an extra attacking edge. In addition, he has expanded the tactical blueprint and enhanced the skill sets of the established stars’.

Farrelly goes as far as to call this team the best to come out of South Africa in 20 years: ‘This looks to be the most complete Springbok side of the professional era, markedly superior to the teams that won the World Cups in 1995 and 2007’. Farrelly ends his column by declaring that ‘South Africa have found a template for others to aspire to’.

The Irish press corps remain pessimistic about their team’s chances against the Boks this Saturday. This much was clear in the main rugby piece in today’s Irish Independent, in which the writer, Ruaidhri O’Connor, seems surprised to hear that the Ireland team still harbours hope of an upset.

‘We have to be smarter, not try to run through the Boks’ is the comment by Conor Murray that has been used as a headline. The scrumhalf plays down the injuries that have hit the squad, and said Ireland will employ a less direct approach regardless of their personnel. The writer feels that Murray is ‘speaking for a confident squad, one at odds with a fearful public’ and while a win against the Boks would be a great achievement for the top side in Europe, ‘few locals will put their money on it’.

Elsewhere in today’s edition of the Irish Independent, David Kelly notes the evolution of this Bok side under Meyer. ‘And so the Springboks have become reformed creatures, still the most fearsome gainline bashers in the business but with added guile to their formidable grunt’. Kelly says readers can expect an exciting Test now that Pollard is playing at No 10 for the Boks, and suggests the clash between Pollard and Ireland pivot Jonny Sexton, who has been pronounced fit, should be a classic.

The Irish Examiner has published their ‘power rankings’ for the autumn internationals, and unsurprisingly the All Blacks, Boks and Wallabies are ranked at No 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Ireland come in at No 4 ahead of England. Simon Lewis believes England will battle without a series of frontline players this November, and that Ireland will also have to cope following several big losses in personnel.

By Jon Cardinelli

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,293 posts
04 Nov 2014, 16:29
#2
04 Nov 2014, 16:29#2
 Farrelly goes as far as to call this team the best to come out of South Africa in 20 years: ‘This looks to be the most complete Springbok side of the professional era, markedly superior to the teams that won the World Cups in 1995.....
I think this well rested Bok Team is going to cause some major havoc in the Northern Hemisphere this year. I expect the Boks to again be the standout team in the world on tour, and the wee All Black forwards to be slapped around only to be saved in the last 10 minutes by the backs as the game opens up.

PA
PakieCaptain17,321 posts
04 Nov 2014, 16:34
#3
04 Nov 2014, 16:34#3
I don't agree with this being the best Bok side in 20 years. That honor probably goes to Mallett's side prior to the debacles starting, while the '95 side was pretty special in their own way.
BL
bluebokPro3,977 posts
04 Nov 2014, 16:38
#4
04 Nov 2014, 16:38#4
Lets wait and see which team Meyer selects, but it should be a pretty good side regardless! A bunch of people don't like Meyer and his selections, but the Boks are strong at the moment. Having said that, and looking at the test results since the start of the year, there is not much between no.1 in the world, and number 6. In other words, the AB's, Australia, and South Africa could all have lost many more matches this year. All three won and lost games in the dying moments of the match. No one side has been completely dominant. 
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
04 Nov 2014, 18:20
#5
04 Nov 2014, 18:20#5
Is this a case of "come into my web said the spider to the fly"? 
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
04 Nov 2014, 18:30
#6
04 Nov 2014, 18:30#6
 Correct JW, The Irish normally plays well against us, they sure as hell believe they can take us. It will be an ugly game though....They nearly had you lot last year was it?
PA
PakieCaptain17,321 posts
04 Nov 2014, 19:04
#7
04 Nov 2014, 19:04#7
Definitely a subterfuge campaign by the Irish. It's seldom an easy game over there.
WA
WardadPro6,663 posts
05 Nov 2014, 05:27
#8
05 Nov 2014, 05:27#8
 Well then sharkbok going on performances based on winning the ABS must be the best side ever if this bok side is the best in 20 years And didnt the boks  get saved by their backs this year after their forwards got slapped about by the likes of Argentina ,WAles etc?
Then again might be some smoke being blown up a few butts !
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
05 Nov 2014, 08:23
#9
05 Nov 2014, 08:23#9
 
The Irish play well against sides that kick everything away. In fact most teams are brought into the match by sides that kick everything away.

That is perhaps why they're 3-2 up on us. Not cause they're better than us but rather cause we've been playing a stupid brand of rugby.

We've seen a different Bok side in the last two test played. I'm hoping this fool of coach has taken note of what we're capable of with ball in hand.

I'm confident that if we retain possession we'll thrash the Irish in their own backyard.

It's not arrogance. It's a hope that Meyer selects properly and a confidence in the right selection playing the right brand of rugby.




 
BL
BlikkiesPro1,526 posts
05 Nov 2014, 09:01
#10
05 Nov 2014, 09:01#10
The Boks tend to be vulnerable when they carry the 'best team' label. The RWC 2007 serves as a good example when the Boks overwhelmed England in the Pool rounds, but it was only a grass blade that saved them, as favourites, from defeat in the final. 
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
05 Nov 2014, 10:04
#11
05 Nov 2014, 10:04#11
 I think barring injuries we have a very rich pool of talent. However the squad has to many wrong selections and quota players. The pack against the abs was by Bok standards a weak pack. The NH sides don't have much to fear re that Bok pack -unless of course theyare as pap as the wee abs! Hahahahahahahahahaha
Has Meyer really learnt his lessons and is he really departing from the bulle blueprint . We shall see. Pienaaar out helps.
The kbbs will note how the Mighty Boks are know for their rugged play. Unlike the "woosies" wee abs who play "dodgy" rugby!

MO
moolaaPro2,380 posts
05 Nov 2014, 10:45
#12
05 Nov 2014, 10:45#12
 To be fair it wouldn't be that difficult to be the best Bok side in 20 years....
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
05 Nov 2014, 11:00
#13
05 Nov 2014, 11:00#13
 Welcome back mooo la even if your post is seriously lacking in rugby acumen.
The wee abs have been struggling on the NH tours and getting away with fantastically lucky wins ADDING to a ruby bubble forming of HUGE PROPORTIONS.


I TRUST OU HACKED WAAAGH AND JW WILL NOW GET THE POINT COURTESY OF THIS PICTORAL ASSISTANCE




— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news