Is Pistorius Innocent or Guilty?

Like many folks, I have been following the Pistorius trial intently, eager to glean some new piece of definitive information that will help convince me of his guilt or innocence.  Im still undecided but if I was forced to make a decision I would say he was at least guilty of recklessly firing his pistol at an unidentified target (manslaughter) if not deliberate and cold blooded murder. 

 From what I can gather the prosecution case is largely circumstantial, relying heavily on eye witness accounts. The neighbours testimony where she claimed she heard TWO distinct voices engaged in a heated argument BEFORE she heard gunfire is especially damning. I found the defences explanation unconvincing i.e. both voices were Oscars, the high pitched womanly squeals was Oscars reaction to the realisation that he had shot his girlfriend, and the loud banging that followed the screams was not gunfire but Oscar trying to break down the door with a cricket bat. This is a weak defence for countless reasons, least of all is why the door would have been locked in the first place. 

Its also been revealed that Oscar has a history for recklessly discharging his firearms. One example was the restaurant incident where he fired his gun under the table then begged a friend to take responsibility for the mishap because he didn't want to deal with the ensuing furore. The most pertinent example is the claim by an ex girlfriend that Oscar fired a pistol through his open sunroof because he was angry that the policeman had touched his gun after he had been pulled over for speeding. If Oscar is not guilty of murder he is definitely guilty of being an über-pratt. 

Then we have testimony from several eye witness' suggesting that Oscar is a hothead, easily bought to the boil and has on occasion been known to express his anger in an intimidating and frightening manner. We have the police reports that document at least 2 separate visits to the couples home because of "domestic disturbances". We also have text messages where Reeva has said she was afraid of Oscar.

Anyways, I'm just curious to hear what others think. Im not trying to make any commentary on the South African legal system nor do I intend this thread to turn into a "NZ is better than SA" debate. I just want to know if others are as fascinated as I am and whether anyone has an opinion about Oscars innocence or guilt. 

www.supersupporter.net/gossip-section/9479-oscar-pistorius.html

Nukefkiwi, here's a good mix of SA opinions, plus more .

 Guilty

I ask myself why would she have taken her mobile with her into the toilet in the early hours of the morning. My main reason is that it appears that the first shot hit her in the arm, she would have screamed, he would have recognized her voice....end of.

It was moving watching Oscar at the Olympics in the 400 relay.....then a week or so later he accused the young Brazilian who beat him in the Para 200 of cheating. T he lack of sportsmanship was shocking, I think to everybody who saw Oscar as a symbol of courage. The Para games to a large extent, were his games up to that point.

And now this, has anybody fallen so far from grace.