FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Jake White: Overseas-based South African XV would beat Springboks; Rugby Stuff

Jake White: Overseas-based South African XV would beat Springboks; Rugby Stuff

Started by Just_win26 REPLIES671 VIEWS· 26 Apr 2017, 01:37
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
26 Apr 2017, 01:37
#1
26 Apr 2017, 01:37#1

Link to article

Is old Jake putting himself in the running for coach of the Boks again?
TH
TheTraditionalistPro4,003 posts
27 Apr 2017, 12:48
#2
27 Apr 2017, 12:48#2
 More likely trying to paint the situation otherwise.
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,260 posts
27 Apr 2017, 14:13
#3
27 Apr 2017, 14:13#3
SARU should throw down the gauntlet. 
Coetzee's losers XV vs Jake White SA overseas Barbarian has been XV. If Coetzee loses- then schedule another Indaba.

TH
TheTraditionalistPro4,003 posts
27 Apr 2017, 20:00
#4
27 Apr 2017, 20:00#4
 A SA international squad can not be justified because they beat another SA international squad.

In the current situation, the justification for a SA squad is winning.
Out of 3 WCs, SA must win 2. Out of 6 4Ns, SA must win 5.

It is no longer about the priviledge to lose. It is about the duty of winning.
Useless to line up two teams that play loser rugby to determine who is going to be the fortunate loser.
Compulsory to field one team that wins.
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
27 Apr 2017, 22:34
#5
27 Apr 2017, 22:34#5
 WTF? Rugby in SA is justified by the players actually playing the game and by the fans supporting it. Even in bad patches like now, the fans are still interested. P!ssed off at how poor we are, but still watching.
CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
27 Apr 2017, 22:41
#6
27 Apr 2017, 22:41#6
 I would suggest they set this up ASAP as that way a South African team  is guaranteed to win at least 1 test this year
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
28 Apr 2017, 11:36
#7
28 Apr 2017, 11:36#7
 Draad this is far more serious than a bad patch oak. SA Rugby is disintegrating. Unfortunately there is not the will to address the many issues.
While the kiwis rejoice and turncoats like rooitwiterrbug and wee cc are filled with glee at the failures, real savvy rugby supporters here fear for the future of the game. If an OZ or NZ coach had fared as badly as Coetzee he would have been fired. But here rugby is not the focus quotas are. Then there are a myriad of problems. As a consequence even our young players ship out. Our best coaches don't coach here apart from Ackermans coaching team. We refuse to even get in outside help as the focus again is not on solutions. 
Its being going downhill for some years now and many ask where is the reason to hope?Hence the importance of becoming a fan of another sport. For me its tennis. A sport where merit is the currency and bent refs are not a problem
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
28 Apr 2017, 13:10
#8
28 Apr 2017, 13:10#8
Typical Stompies, their team is rubbish so by definition all of SA rugby is rubbish!

And they wonder why they're called the "Blowhards"!

LMAO!

Come on Sharks and Lions!
TH
TheTraditionalistPro4,003 posts
28 Apr 2017, 13:16
#9
28 Apr 2017, 13:16#9
 

 WTF? Rugby in SA is justified by the players actually playing the game and by the fans supporting it. Even in bad patches like now, the fans are still interested. P!ssed off at how poor we are, but still watching.


Fans will have the opportunity to watch and support SA non professional teams or watch and support non SA professional teams.

It is about the professional practice of 15 rugby in SA, a country in which kids die from starvation, is one drought away from a major water crisis and more.

It is about getting priorities right.
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
28 Apr 2017, 13:27
#10
28 Apr 2017, 13:27#10
 
The Goats would be cleaned up by North West Eastern Free State at the moment.

It's no longer a big deal to lose to the entry level teams of world rugby.

We're growing accustomed to it.

And yes ....... GOOOOOOOOOO LIIOOOONSSSS & SHAAAAAAAAAARKSSSSSSSS!!!
 




DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
28 Apr 2017, 15:13
#11
28 Apr 2017, 15:13#11
 The goats might be torn a new AH, but Trad would still be a bitterbal.
TH
TheTraditionalistPro4,003 posts
01 May 2017, 09:58
#12
01 May 2017, 09:58#12
 As stated, this looks like ponzi.

SA rugby can not be justified, there is no reason to practise rugby in SA.

Noticeably, the composition of the teams can be adjusted in any way.

This NH side played against a selection of SA white players only. And the winner is...

This kind of scheme only fool people who want to be fooled. You must be compliant to fall that kind of stuff.

At the moment, the only questions a SA side must answer are the ones asked previously.
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
01 May 2017, 10:13
#13
01 May 2017, 10:13#13
 Same old, same old.....we've heard it all before. Listen fella, do us all a great big favour by taking your twaddle to a place where someone cares.
You're a bore, a big hippo yawn bore....Go soonest.
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
01 May 2017, 12:29
#14
01 May 2017, 12:29#14
 
He's even worse than you, Denny ... and that's saying something.




DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
01 May 2017, 12:52
#15
01 May 2017, 12:52#15
 As a matter of fact he reminds me of you when you bang on about the goats this, the goats that..nyaaah nyaaah nyaaah nyaaaa aah

TH
TheTraditionalistPro4,003 posts
01 May 2017, 12:56
#16
01 May 2017, 12:56#16
 Same old, same old....

This board is made of same old, same old. Same bits repeated over and over again.

Posters who are older in the same old, same old line could show the example by packing up first.
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
01 May 2017, 13:04
#17
01 May 2017, 13:04#17
 majority rules.....or should I say the board is unanimous in declaring you a....bore.
TH
TheTraditionalistPro4,003 posts
01 May 2017, 13:41
#18
01 May 2017, 13:41#18
 Majority rules...

One of these comments with all the salt in it.
It takes foot to declare stuff like that in the context of SA.

SA is that country that fails to get one single decent rugby player out of the large majority.Yet majority rules.


sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,260 posts
01 May 2017, 16:51
#19
01 May 2017, 16:51#19
@Traditionalist. Africa has the highest amount of orphaned/starving children in the world. 
You are trying to use rugby as a scapegoat- instead of acknowledging that sometimes it is "the parents" whom are to blame for abandoning their children. (Other than AIDS victims etc who have not choice).  
Incidentally in America, kids with the highest rate of orphanage are of African descent. 

Do you do anything to help orphaned or/and starving children? I doubt it....... You are too busy posting on sports websites. It sounds like you are excellent men consuming content. 



 Trad
Just a question - what is the annual budget on rugby?   Definitely less than R500 million and the money does not come from the State - it comes from private individuals.  
The Social Grant Budget is R17 billion per month - and some of the piffling amounts made available to poor families is pilfered by the crooks in Government and their fellow-travellers.
So what difference will that R500 million makes to starving people even if the Government fleece the people of the R500 million and Zuma steals it all.   There is no logic to your argument at all - bearing in mind that the state-supported soccer has a much bigger budget of which a major proportion came from Government institutions.   So is soccer also to be banned to stop starvation ?        
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news