There has been two newspapr articles on White's resignation from the Sharks set-up and those are reflected here:-
Jake White's Loyalty
"The announcement that Jake White willleave current Currie Cup champions the Sharks has led many to question the former World Cup-winning Springbok coach's loyalty.
According to eNCA's website, pundits are baffled at his decision especially after White revealed that he would be interested in coaching internationally again in the lead up to the 2015 Rugby World Cup.
White quit the Sharks after just one season in charge, reaching the Super Rugby semi-final, losing to the Crusaders.
While in Durban, he was also tasked to up skill the young coaches and tidy up all rugby structures from the Sharks Academy right up to the senior team.
"I believe we put together some excellent structures under new chief executive John Smit, who was always supportive.
"I'm closing this chapter in my life as I believe it is the right time to do so. I want to thank and acknowledge the Sharks for my time spent with the team," said White in a statement.
Meanwhile, on Twitter, some were saying that White may even be reunited with Gert Smal, who is the director of rugby at Western Province, while others echoed murmurs of discontent within the Sharks ranks, which further fuelled speculation that White may have been pushed to resign before he was sacked.
Former Springbok assistant coach Dick Muir said that despite a relatively successful stint with the Sharks during the Super Rugby season, his playing style, although winning, did not attract and that White "wasn't much of a crowd pleaser".
With most of the top-tier teams already set in their preparations for the RWC in England next year, it is unclear where White may move to next, should he indeed return to the international arena."
comments
Interesting comments on twitter. Lets cast our minds back to 2012 - when the Stormers played the same style of rugby as advocated by White and lost badly against the Crusaders in the Super 15 semi-final at home. That type of rugby based on defense and ten-man rugby did not find favour with the Sharks fans and I woukld not be surprised if the discontent in the Sharks raks was getting to a crisis point. It is possible that the rebellion was in the main about Francois Steyn's destructive roile in backline perforrmances - especially since those were generally inadequate both from an attacking and defending perspective. The mere fact that Steyn was excused from training with the team due to a whacky knee would show undue favouritism and would not be appreciated by his team mates and could cause major disgruntlement amongst the players.
Jake-free Sharks to cut loose
"The effect at Kings Park, good or bad, of Jake White’s abrupt departure from the Sharks fold may become evident sooner rather than later ... perhaps even as swiftly as Friday night.
It is then that the defending Currie Cup champions play a vital match against the Golden Lions, one which could go some way to determining which of the two earns a home semi-final.
As things stand, the Sharks lie third on the table with two rounds of pre-knockout play left, five points behind the second-placed Lions.
A clear-cut victory for the home side would potentially draw them level with the Johannesburg-based outfit, even if the dice would stay loaded against the Sharks ending ordinary season better placed: the Lions’ last match is at home to the Cheetahs, whereas the Durban crew must travel to the Cape to play rampant leaders Western Province.
Whatever happens -- and even considering the fact that the Currie Cup is an increasingly poorer cousin to Super Rugby -- I just suspect we may see some tangible evidence over the next few weeks of the mood in the Kings Park camp following the rather sudden exit of director of rugby White.
Yes, he took on an “advisory” role for the Currie Cup campaign, but was still the big guy to all intents and purposes in the coaching staff’s pecking order: I can’t claim to know precisely to what extent he still pulled the strings even as Brad Macleod-Henderson wore the head coach tracksuit, but he is unlikely to have been a shrinking violet.
What is close to beyond dispute, I submit, is that for much of this year, whether in Super Rugby or the Currie Cup, too much of the Sharks’ play has been rigidly template-based and just a little joyless – it won’t have helped the quest to return better crowd figures to their home ground, and it is possible his philosophy wasn’t universally treasured by the Sharks players.
So did Jake jump after a lone full (well, fullish) calendar year in charge or was he pushed?
The answer was blowing in the wind as this was written, with a scramble for any clues through the fairly customary, diplomatic severance-of-duties statement from the Sharks on their official website on Monday.
Already one or two scribes have speculated on the instant medium of Twitter that some element of “good riddance” may have entered the equation; he has a reputation as a strong, single-minded and perhaps stubborn character.
But whatever you may say about the kindness of the Bok route to the glory that year, his World Cup 2007-winning achievement is an indelible component of his CV and may even be the cause of residual envy by some contemporaries and critics.
White also attracts criticism for his perceived “mercenary” tendencies, the pretty standard joke being that if there’s a first-class rugby coaching job going anywhere in the world, he will be interested – even if he’s just started out somewhere else.
Then again, is there any law against someone being a fairly routine nomad and restless “quick fix” sort of guru? Aren’t there also cases of head honchos who actually overstay their welcome, and go fatally stale?
He wasn’t at the Brumbies for especially long, for example, but his efforts notably awakened a once-mighty Super Rugby franchise from a significant spell in the doldrums.
Given the strength of squad at his disposal, White also achieved roughly par, you might argue, in his only full season this year in charge of the Sharks’ own assault on the SANZAR tournament, taking them to the semi-finals as only South African side to get that far in a seriously disappointing year for our conference.
His teams don’t always win prettily, but historically they do tend to win more frequently than they lose, which is why his credentials will always attract interest.
Put it this way: the man won’t ever go hungry.
Has he moved properly with the times, though? Maybe that is a relevant topic to debate in the wake of his Durban departure.
A few weeks ago White was slightly crudely branded a “tactical Neanderthal” by a writer for New Zealand’s main national newspaper, whilst more locally SuperSport pundit and a predecessor as Bok coach Nick Mallett has sometimes lamented his “pressure rugby; kicking rugby ... too much playing without the ball”.
Interestingly, on the very weekend that news of White’s cessation of service at Kings Park may well have spread through the dressing room – or at least was on the very, very nearby grapevine -- the Sharks broke their shackles, if you like, to register a rare seven-try blitz against the EP Kings.
There just seemed an overdue whiff of freedom to their play, albeit that it has to be acknowledged the Kings have become painfully porous against just about everyone.
Is it just possible that a fresh fragrance of liberation, of gleeful abandonment of inflexible structure, has permeated the ranks?
My gut feel, whether correct or not, is that right now some rival strategists in the Currie Cup may fear a concerted late Sharks rally in defence of their title a wee bit more than they did a day or two ago.
So Durban bids farewell to Jake White. His short tenure was far from a disaster, but guarded “appreciation” may be a more lingering and accurate local tribute to him than affection. There will be those who offer up no tribute at all.
He is just, and may always be, that kind of guy."
COMMENTS
I wrote lsewhere about the selection problems encountered by the Sharks in recent weeks - namely the useage of Andre Esterhuizen and Paul Jordaan - or lack of it in recent matches lost or drawn by the Sharks. Did Jake Wh8ite caused those misadventures as a result of inteference in team selection?
Probably it was instrumental in creating a bad team atmosphere. and a generally poor performance by the Sharks in the three matches invovled. The sudden recovery against the Sharks indicated that there wwas a clear change in team selection and hugely postive results.
