Not because he is the best tighthead in the world....but because, it appears, he is our only tighthead. Who else could we start against NZ. Not Coenie, Marcel, Malherbe or any other young tighthead in the S15. Hell at this point Pat Cilliers looks like the only other adult in the room. Any thoughts....it's a serious question.
Jannie is the national treasure
The two Lions props Redlinghuys (114kg) and Van der merwe (115 kg) have done well.Nothing much wrong with MArcel van der Merwe either.
Pat Cilliers 27 years old and 113 kg doesnt cut it for me as atest player. Its st ep up too far.
Jannie is a liability on defense. I have never seen any player ever concede tries at critical points in the game from missed tackles as Jannie.
His work rate outside the scrum is poor, and his scrumming is good on some days but average on other days.
Cilliers was tried in the past and failed and that is the end of your argument in his case. Why d you think that when Malherbe is acailabel - he is preferred by the Stormers to Cilliers? The answer is plain and simple - he is a btter player in all Departments of the game than Cilliers.
The issue here is to my mind that Van der Merwe and Coenie showed some dificiencies in scrumming. Van der Merwe can iprove with more experience - but sad to say that neck injury is impacting on Coenie's [erformance. I must agree with you he is not the answer.
If you look at Jannie du Plessis - he has his good days and his bad days. He is very likely to be carded or give away penalties inside and outside of scrumming. He iss still my first choice at tight-head - but I am not so sure about him being the national treasure you give him out to be.
Get him to trim down to 118 kg and play him hooker!
Malherbe was injured - he suffered from Concussion - on 3 may 2014. And when I spoke his father he said he would be back for the CC. It was not really a physical injury - he kept on doing physical training - but because the concussion symptoms took longer than expected to heal - he was kept out of the Springbok squad and not used for the last two matches of the Stormers in Super 15. He will start for the Stormers in the CC when it starts and will be ready to play for the Springboks as from the start of the RC.
The problem was that after Malherbe came off the field with concussion - for some stupid reason reason or another he was sent back onto the field and played on for another 10 minutes. Apparently during that ten minutes the concussion problem got worse. He should not have gone back - if he did not go back to play further - he would have been back weeks ago to play .
Jannie du Plessis is one out of the few that is overrated in the boks. Regardless of how bad he plays during the course of Super15 or RC he will remain the first choice tighthead prop merely based on the amount of Springbok caps he's got which is unfortunate but true. Aside the fact that he is deficient player, it is clear that Jannie is a easy player to provoke in the push and shove situations which often leads to a yellow card with that kind of player. That hard slap by Jannie on Karl Lowe relates to the point that I made.
Starting again with your personal Bullshit after I exposed yoo r lies.
Then do it - why don;t you point it out time and again - like I did in the case of Steyn. You won't because you can't and it will expose your lies even further. Now he was way too ancious out there - mortal sin that one - prove it and do not use your general BS in the process.
When have I existed the string? I m not doing it as you ran foro cover when I started a string on the Reinach issue exposing your duplicity. When I mentioned what Steyn did - and mentioned specifically three incidents - you ran like a coward. Why did you not defend Steyn in those specific cases?
Reinach was way too anxious - Steyn was zero thinking ability. I would rather have the first than the second problem with a player.
You are the one who suddenly takes cover in this case under a flood of verbal diarrhea because you made false comments - got caught out - and must no w find an escape mechanism.
Time to post this one again:
Time to be idiotic again.
Dave totally uncalled for....if you want to read bias read Ryder Haggard or better yet read Bram Stoker for pure bias. Or read John Buchan, there we have covered England, Ireland and Canada.
Or read your usual, the funny papers.
You are big at crying racism without a shred of evidence. It's offensive.
Moz I wouldn't describe Jannie's performance as "massive" like you say, it was a rather average display from him. The sharks scrummaging was good with Tom de Toit and Jannie but I can also conclude that the scrummaging was the same and dominant without Jannie when he was replaced by Lourens Adriaanse. If he was so "massive" why did Jake decide to take him off? I'll leave it up to you.
The performance doesn't change the fact that he is a deficient player and is average at times. I don't think he deserves a springbok starting spot when there are other tighthead props that doesn't give much opportunities to the opposition by penalties/missed tackles like Jannie. Meyer does not use rational thinking with certain selections.
Fact is our young tightheads have had no issues at scrum time. Malherbe has been very good. Marcel v/d Merwe and Frik Kirsten got Bok call ups this year for good reason - they have been damn good in the scrums.
There has been lies written about Marcel's scrumming against the Lions and Rebels, lies that have exposed the author
Coenie's transition to tighthead has been good as evidenced by his performances there at test level off the bench. This S15 he has been solid at 3 with only the ref getting it hopelessly wrong against the Lions pining him for inwards scrumming when it was impossible to lay the blame on Coenie or v/d Merwe. That same ref made a compete arse of himself by carding Coenie only to award the Cheetahs a free kick the following scrum against v/d Merwe for inwards scrumming.
Fact is we have greater depth at tighthead than any other country. Our young tightheads are better scrummagers than Jannie was at the same age and all offer far more in general play.
Jannie has always been good, the same posters who are lauding him now were telling us he was useless years ago. Jannie is no better a scrummager than Coenie, Marcel, Malherbe or Frik Kirsten.........our prop depth is very healthy as are most positions.
We have more than enough material to work with in Coenie, Marcel v/d Merwe, Nkanyane, Kitshoff, Malherbe, Mellett, Frik Kirsten, Maks v/Dyk, Ollie Kebble and Thomas du Toit.
The reality is, you don't see tightheads or looseheads dominating their opposite numbers one on one.....the scrum is about the collective whole.......the Sharks vs Highlanders is a prime example.......nothing changed in terms of Sharks dominance when Jannie and du Toit were subbed.
Any combination of Coenie, Beast, Marcel v/d Merwe, Malherbe, Nkanyane, Kirsten and Kitshoff with Bismark or Strauss between them with Etzebeth, Willemse, PSDT, Lood, Jacques du Plessis, Coetzee, Arno Botha and Vermeulen behind them should more than be able to hold their own in the scrums at test level
Despicable post
Nothing more... nothing less
Saffex
Status:Hall Of Fame
Posts: 8415 RE: Jannie is the national treasure
July 21, 2014, 01:20:42 You are Dutch you would not know anything about facts......it was you lot that somehow interpreted the Bible as evidence that blacks were an inferior race - hence your justification for apartheid, given your age.....my guess is that you probably initiated the movement and will have justified your case base on your interpretation of the facts......you must be so proud khaki man?
There are no other tightheads god enough to take over from Jannie? Who did that rating? If it is you we know you lie about player performances like it is unbelievable.
I said initially I have no objection to Jannie being selected - but he definitely is not irreplaceable and "a national treasure" as you put it.


