They discuss the Lood red and show a photo that actually nukes the red.
Keo notes how harsh Bok supporters are when the Boks are not playing well. He should see what nutjobs we have here who complain and whine about the Boks e when the Boks are doing so well.
It was a clear red. A tackle that was meant to hurt. Yes Ramos was dropping but it wasn’t a reflex tackle it was with intent. The whole wrapping thing in rugby is nonsense….how does wrapping an arm help Ramos if de Jager’s full force is projected via the shoulder into the head.
BS again - "that was meant to hurt". How he hell did you know that supershit rugby idiot.
It was intended to be a dominant tackle….like Dud Toit on Barrett….a forward coming in at pace hitting a stationary back. ‘It was meant to hurt’ shouldn’t be taken literally, in this context it was meant to disrupt would probably be better ….although it surely did hurt.
That is what you wrote dimdoos and as per normal it was a distortion you invented in that mind of yours.. Bmy the way you are at a stage where you wrote contnuos shit on site and th en claim it must not be taken as literally - in fact nothing you write on site should be taken as literal - what an admission by you anyway.
" That is what you wrote dimdoos and as per normal it was a distortion you invented in that mind of yours.. Bmy the way you are at a stage where you wrote contnuos shit on site and th en claim it must not be taken as literally - in fact nothing you write on site should be taken as literal - what an admission by you anyway."
Well Done Uncle BS. You’ve just perfectly described yourself !!
Also very interesting how both Keo and Zels praise Esterhuizen’s versatility, yet clearly state that this is a dual role.
He is still primarily a centre. Wake up and take note, Uncle BS ! :)
Another idiot on site Manpower prove to eveyone again.
Another dim cunt on sote manpower prove to eveyon again.
Jirre MP, sê die oom jou darem nou. Retire maar eerder boet, daar's nie 'n comeback vir daai een nie.
You’re right, Pakie. I’m done for. Guess it’s time I bow out of Ruckers Forum with what’s left of my dignity ;(
I don't mean to demean anyone on site - but the repeated unproved BS is getting at me at times,
If you do not get the message purely absed on Easmus own view it cause me to in the end make demeaning remarks, The fact that I view as a very good loosie was statistically proven in ests he plamyed in and constant attacks on some palyers based on distortions got the ebtter of me. So I hereby apologize to Manpower. .
Mike I don't think Mozzie even watched tbe video. If he had he would have seen the arm of Ramos preventing the wrap around.
That photo nukes the whole red card narrative.
Ramos had also dropped to his knee by the time of impact. That is a huge mitigating factor.
But trust the anti Bok nutter Mozzie to take the anti Bok position. One thing about ou Mozzie is he is very consistent.
Mampara power be assured you have zero dignity left to worry about. Bwahahahahaha.
"I’m done for. Guess it’s time I bow out of Ruckers Forum with what’s left of my dignity ;("
Here we go again . . . what will this be, the 100th time?
Have you hit 100 characters yet, giMp? What dignity could you possibly have left?
Serious question.
I will nevr apologze to Mozart because he has led an anti-Springboks and Erasmus for at least 7 years. Most of h is writings on site consisting of lies and distortions.
All‘s fair in love and war, Uncle Mike…So no sweat, all good. On to the next round :)
Forget all the stupid WR rules of wrapping and mitigation. Look at the Lomp tackle and that of Sam Cane in the WC final. The Lomp tackle was far more dangerous and far more intentional. The moment I saw the first replay it said red card. And yet while all the SA press and many fans are howling Lomp was robbed, nobody said a peep about the Cane tackle.
According to the standards that have been applied in other significant tests, this was a red all day long.
So now it’s a hundred faces, RooiTit?
First it was seven, including Mpower, now I’ve apparently multiplied overnight.
That’s some serious talent, wouldn’t you agree ??
I’ve been posting as Mpower since September 2021, when I joined.
I have NEVER felt the need to hide behind any other names.
You can spin it however you want, but at this point it’s pure Bull Shit and Shit stirring:)
But hey knock yourself out and Keep reaching, it’s not me looking like the Desperate Fool.
A-Fucking-men!
Ask Rhonda if she has ever used another name M. Let’s see if the doddering old fool will be honest.
The Lomp tackle was far more dangerous and far more intentional. The moment I saw the first replay it said red card.
I his whole playing career since 2013 De Jager had 1 red card in 2016 before Satorsdday - so Mozart come up with the above ridiculous and hatne mon gerin g BS again. Dev Jager is not a dirty player aimed to injure other players and the player he aimed to injure suffered no real consequences and palyed on afterwards.
Mattfield in that match in 2015. should necver havce b een in the Springbok RWC squad in 2025. He ailed miserably in line-outs in boh tests in 2014 and w the forward leader in the Japan disasteer in 2015 clearly dsobeying he instructions given to him. In h is second RWC test against Samoa = he wa;lked off halfwa through the frst half claiming he was injured, The enext match he played in was rom the bench in the semifinal wheere he was on the bench in the Semifinal where he fucked up royally. In th first line-out he was outjumped by Witlock and the next phase resulted in a kickable penalty for the Springboks until Mattfield intervened by grabbing the neck of a All Black player and the penalty was reversed and the Springboks penalized instead. That was the fnal nail in the coffin of the S pring boks hope to win the WC.and the rotten career of Meyer as Springbok coach ended.
Can was not red carded for a tackle - he was red-carded because he tiied the same stunt that Matffield tried in 2015. .
How about Red Rose, Moz?
Not sure…Koosie rings a bell.
By the way the hearing on the De Jager rd card started at 15:00 SA time and now 3,5 hours later no decision has been released as yet,
Serious infactions normally gets 4 plua weeks bans. Ersmus effectovely got a 3 week nam.
i tjink that hearin gs like t he above should not have members the Springboks against whom Ireland is due to play ahainst SA durin the banning period. Instead of 2 Irish and one Romanians made up the hearing pabel, , The same happned The Irish member dhoulf tsthrt hsr nrrm gtom England ot Scotland 0 bit from Ireland,or Wals - like happemed in the case of Wessels. The ban on Wessels is now sunject to a court case and that type of Committee should comprise of members not involved in imminent tests during the banning period.
That defintely will be tsaised in the upcoming court case.
. . . .
The same happned The Irish member dhoulf tsthrt hsr nrrm gtom England ot Scotland 0 bit from Ireland,or Wals
Wowzer. Slow down oom, you're sounding more and more like a cat walking over a keyboard.
"The same happned The Irish member dhoulf tsthrt hsr nrrm gtom England ot Scotland 0 bit from Ireland,or Wals"
Wasnt sure if the Oom was quoting the review panel in Gaelic, Romanian or Klingon.
Lood 100% deserved the Red card and the sanction that he got
His intent was to hurt someone with that shoulder...... no question about it
I called a Red as soon as I saw it