"Kerevi Never Dominated Damian - It Simply Did Not Happen"

"Nope he did not dominate him at all name one passage of play where he dominated DA - it simply did not happen"

The self-appointed leader of the Kak Pack simply can't help himself. The first Wallaby test:

04:12 - AUS L/O: After a lot of shuffling A5 drops it to A9 who sends a long flat pass intended for A8. Ball goes beyond him, and bobbles. A12 gathers, and S12 is immediately upon him. A12 drags S12 laterally about a metre before going to ground, carrying on his course to towards the opposite touchline. /

06:14 - AUS L/O: Throw to front of lineout, uncontested. A9 long pass out to A10, who brings in S10 opposite him, passes short to A12 in front of S12. A12 is grabbed primarily by S12 and drags him a very long way backwards in spite of S10 assisting S12.

Just a reminder that Kerevi didn't punk Dumbian all by himself. 

37:15 - AUS L/O: Wallabies set maul. A9 flat to A12, A12 runs at S10 and passes in the face of contact short to A13 who runs right into S12, and drags him back very far before going to ground. Quick clean Wallaby ball. 

Just a small sample. 

Unter, you sound tired and old. The bluster has become a passive, repetitive drone. I think it's time you retire from your position, passing on the title to Chabs (Twizzle Dee).

Of course, it didn't pass the 'ol ey test. You are telling me right now that this is a lie? How many times Unter? How many times do we have to go through this before you realise that I don't fabricate anything and I never bluff. 

Oh, I have valid points. In your wildest dreams you take them apart, but in reality, you cannot. Sloppy, lazy and arrogant, what a recipe for success. The Kak Pack cannot be taken seriously. From a years worth of rugby and all they have to say is we are right "because", "everyone knowa it's true" and "X said so, therefore it mustbe true". Weak. Very, very weak.