Kiwi's, feel free to tell us what is wrong there! Take your time!

@boklogic,

heres whats wrong with that picture, look at bizzys shorts,,,,


SA natonal team the Springboks are sponsored by canterbury of NZ, a NZ company.

then again its not the Boks fault they cant attract international brands like AIG or adidas, but maybe one day when they can start beating top teams regularly, :oP
 

but im more interested in what siones uncle has to say on the matter, LMFAO, :oD

Sazuki, tell us about it ................... that feckin' Cbury logo ? How I hate it . At RWC time its worse, the Bokkie minitiarised & sleeved, cos the front must show the RWC logo & the effing protea , declared the new national sporting symbol of the Rainbow by the latest regime . This shrub that will unite the nation while three fuckin kiwis are on the jersey. Horrible, sheer madness .

Thankfully we have a new sponsor next year . Can't wait .

 From what I recall I dont think it is actually a sponser.

We just get them to make the shorts and actually pay them to do this.

Seems pretty silly at surely making a pair of shorts is not rocket science

Well I've no idea what SA rugby get from Cnterbury but I read that NZ get about US$20 mil a year from Adidas & its rumoured a very similar amount from their additional jersey sponsor AIG who then placed an order to Adidas for 40000 AB jersey for their staff .

Be surprised & disappointed we we get sweet f.a. from ours .

@boklogic,
woah, talk up striking a nerve, LMFAO, :oP

i already told u before, u have a bad rugby credit rating so iys just not possible to take anything u sya rugby wise seriously.

but i love the response, another notch on my belt for a saffa succesfully trolled, :oP

u were the one who brought up siones uncle as if it was gospel and to take saying and give it a twist, u made siones uncles bed, now sleep in it, BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, :oD

and now u want me to ring some guy masquerading  as siones uncle even though u said and i quote,,,
"Yes there is chance he has lied to me but I doubt it. He had more than enough evidence so go on big guy, go fill your boots."
dude, just let it go. its not my fault nobody believes u and siones uncle, LMFAO, :oD

and i cant help but laugh at the rest of ur petty attacks, tsk tsk, i really got under ur skin didnt i, :o)

@blobbok,
i can only imagine how much u must hate it, it would pee me off something wicked too if a SA company with three springboks as a logo was branded on the All Blacks uniform, lolz.
but congratulations on the Boks recent trise to No2, maybe having 3 kiwis branded on the Bok uniform isnt such a bad thing after all, -_o

@sharkbok
need to look up and see how sponsorships work, cos if SARU are paying canterbury of NZ to make them their shorts, u must have the dumbest failed lab experimented monkeys running the show.
and these guys want a bigger say in SANZAR??? o_O

BTW cantyerbury NZ make the whole SA kit, even their training gears, just take a look at the big 3 kiwis slapped top center of the proud Bok uniform.

fills me with such pride to see the NZ rugby empire in all shapes and sizes spreading its beloved arms over the top two rugby nations in the world.

God bless u NZ, :o)

@blobbok,

the report i read from the All Blacks sponosrship deal with adidas had it at a lot more then 20 million US, from memory it was round about $90 million NZ dollars which is just under 75 million US, and the deal from AIG was even more.

will keep u posted though as i do some homework into a worthy subject, and not something silly (whisper) like asking make believe people questions, :oP

 Can't see anything wrong in that video Logic. Bismarck got a yellow card.....mission accomplished!!

Sazuki, I might well be wrong but methinks say that they sign say a 100 mill deal over 5 years payable at 20 p.a

Be a huge laugh for you fellas if we'd been wearing 3 kiwis on the chest for all these years for sweet f.a.

@blobbok,

u did rise to No2 on the IRB rankings which is no small feat.

but i wouldnt worry too much about the Springboks which is what represnets the south african national rugby team having three kiwis dead center on its jersey, i mean who really cares, Boks get paid for that brand end of story as far as im concerend.

an no its not a huge laugh for us kiwis, thanks to our greedy rugby teams, were find most of the time we do have is spent celebrating our many many many many many many many many rugby achievements, :oP

Boklogic u are afew seconds late, the offside and the shoulder charge - you need to watch more rugby league!

Maybe you can feel free to tell us what is wrong down below! Take your time!

 Dan Carter's tweet-

Nothing wrong with the tackle. Fell awkwardly and popped my AC joint.

Bismark is my hero and I should have been given a red card for falling so akwardly. I am remorseful of ruining the game as a spectacle. #gutted #smashedembro

•  Reply 
•  Retweet 
•  Favorite 
•  More

Yep!

• July 13, 2008 12:00AM

THE Springboks will have to turn to their third-choice hooker to face the Wallabies on Saturday after Bismarck du Plessis was suspended today.

Du Plessis was banned for three weeks - but will miss only the one match - after being found guilty of making contact with the eye area of All Blacks flanker Adam Thompson during yesterday's upset 30-28 Tri Nations win in Dunedin.

 The same Adam Thompson who put that player in hospital with a knock out punch from behind?

No Sharkbok, Mike Tyson no longer plays for the ABs! He prefers to play for the Boks who share his passion for ears!

@sharkbok,

" The same Adam Thompson who put that player in hospital with a knock out punch from behind?"
if u wanna play, u gotta come better prepared.

hore was the one who did the hit from behind, not thomo, ok??? :o)

Sasuke, lets sum you up for once.

You troll this board, disagreeing with everyone who does not share your view. Not just disagreeing but "trying" to put them on "the right path" (your path) in a tone that suggests you are a tower of knowledge and your word is gospel.

You are the biggest prick on here and the Boks or Aussies can do no right and the AB's can do no wrong in your eyes and the worst thing is you think your stupid reasonings are believable. Vermuelen would be the hardest player around if not for McCaw. Etzebeth would be the best lock if not for Whitelock. You would be a millionaire if you weren't so stupid!

I really dont care whether you believe I met, and wait for it...Not the queen, not the king but fat, useless Sione Lauaki's uncle...Shit, with your reaction I should have said I met  Conrad Smith's dad but that would be difficult as he doesnt even know who that is. You harp on like a little girl because you think people care what you have to say but I have given you all the proof one can ask for at this stage. The story has clearly affected your life so much so put some effort into verifying it because you are looking like the tosser now. I believe you have more than enough info. Do you need me to draw you a picture too?

I also had a beer with Sir John Kirwan this weekend before boarding a train to the game. You want some proof there too?

Why dont you change your name to "All the answers" or something like that because anyone who differs from you is wrong. Your statements are gold! With that knowledge, you should be employed as a great rugby analyst instead of sitting in your basement on a South African related message board. Your'e a tosser!

@Cloudy, you should speak for yourself. I know there is nothing wrong with that tackle but there is a few kiwi's on here trying to justify it. I know it was not NZL that made the call but it is your countryment trying to justify it.

Its just a pity that once again, an AB vs Bok test match in NZL is marred by cards and shady reffing and not living up to the hype. I guess we were all hoping to talk about the players after the game. Pretty hard to do when the ref stole the show. Bismarck got an 8 out of 10 rating from Mark Keohane after playing only 30 mins. Great way for the ref to get 2 of our most powerful forwards off the field hey!

Smallcock, Sasuke has more rugby knowledge in his little toe than you'll ever have and - unlike you - he can give credit where it's due.

Most regulars here regard Sasuke as someone who knows and loves his rugby and comments on it in an intelligent and often witty manner . . . while you are widely regarded as a humourless and childish rugby noob with the intelligence of a pot plant.

I see you never replied to my question a few days ago as to why you are blurting your client's personal details and job status all over a rugby message board. Is that normal behaviour for you?

Rooipoes, to be honest, I didnt see that post. I dont take much notice of you and your posts anymore. They never rugby related.

I would not be able to comment on your ability to speak rugby. I have never seen you talk it before.

Excuse me if I dont seem to phased by your backing of Sasuke. You are after all, a "Bok supporter" that never has a good word to say about the Boks. You probably are just a kiwi troll. I mean, you have been shunned from some rugby boards and have had to repeatedly hide behind new alias'. Is this normal behaviour from a 50+ year old man?? Get a life Rooicunt.

So, you think the number of a company that can be found by a simple google search is personal? Wrong again my friend. Only thing personal is when I blurt out what your mrs looks like naked!

Please oh wise one, show me this tool you are using to measure rugby knowledge for I have never seen it. I can reply back saying Sasuke and you dont have the knowledge of a toddler but does it really mean anything?

Sasuke is limited in his knowledge. Same old dribble said 100 different ways..Blah blah blah SA kicks, their game plan is not good enough, AB's are the best. SA would have some of the best in the world if not for AB players. Same shit all day long.

Your knowledge Rooi...I love the BOks...Heyneke is a cunt, we will never win under him, Australia will slaughter us, we have a useless team, I love the Boks, all we do is kick, Heynecke is useless, I love the Boks, We beat Australia, Heynecke is a god.... Like your mrs, I just dont know if even you know what you want anymore!

1st yellow: Nothing wrong with the tackle itself. If Bizzy came from an offside position, does make it very cynical. Either way, ref did not handle the situation well. In my opinion an offside penalty with a warning would've been the correct course of action if he was offside.    

2nd yellow: Ref did the right thing here and went upstairs. Striking with the elbow to Messams neck was deemed dangerous. Yellow was completely justified. The red card was also the correct call (but unjustified) 

3rd yellow: Read. This one puzzles me the most. I have watched and analysed the game several times. Can anyone tell me what actually happened here? 

4th yellow: Nonu. Late hit. Correct call

Habana taking out Dagg should have been reviewed.

Piutau tackling Lambie in the air should've been reviewed. 

 Nothing wrong, just a well timed solid hit