SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
07 Jan 2014, 01:09#3
The problem with those stats is that they dont tell you that Lambie was playing in a struggling Sharks side and Morne in a successful Bulls side.
Therein lies the difference - but more to the point. Morne has NEVER been a factor on attack, while we know Lambie has. No amount of stats will ever paint a pretty picture of plodder Morne with ball in hand.
I look forward to your take on Lambie after this S15 when he has been under Jake - by all accounts once Jake has let Lambie play his normal game, no Bok coach will be able to ignore him at 10. I am no fan of Jake, but he is spot on when it comes to Lambie.
Its chalk and cheese stuff..............Lambie is twice the rugby player Morne is. The only slight advantage Morne has over Lambie is kicking........but that is marginal. Other than that, Lambie is streets ahead in terms of ability and vision. Jake has it spot on Lambie has been messed around for far too long. Its time for him to settle at 10 and nowhere else........much like Frans at 12.
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
07 Jan 2014, 01:35#4
I agree stats aren't everything. And I also agree that Morne is not an instinctive running flyhalf. And it's nice to see you rating Jake , Dave, I always have. I have no doubt Jake will improve his play and he may become a real international flyhalf. But he won't be a runner....a small, slow chap who is not particularly elusive isn't going to be a runner from 10. When Lambie runs its because his good instincts allow him to run onto the ball....that doesn't happen at 10.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
07 Jan 2014, 01:56#5
Nope as I said, I am not a Jake fan, but he will be good for the Sharks and Lambie. Disagree on your take on Lambie, he is more than quick enough for 10, has a great eye for a gap. He has good attacking instincts.....something Morne has never had.
Lambie has made some great breaks from 10, but the poor lad seldom finds himself at 10 for 4 weeks in a row.
Jake has gone on record saying Pat will only play 10 and that will be good for Pat
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
07 Jan 2014, 02:09#6
Dave ....wrong old chap....he found himself at 10 for at least 8 consecutive weeks in 2013. The results were mediocre. And I see your point about Lambie being in a losing Sharks team, however, given how much better they looked with Frans at 10, what's the chicken and what's the egg?

sharkbok
Captain23,297 posts

sharkbokCaptain23,297 posts
07 Jan 2014, 03:56#7
Lambie has never got his backline going. He does make some decent breaks at flyhalf but is a pale comparison to Michalak in getting his backline going.
He is not a play maker flyhalf and for what ever reason he is more effective at running from 15 and even inside centre.
I dont recall ever seen a wing get the ball on a structured backline move with Lambie at 10. When lambie combines with any centre, the ball never gets past the 10/12 axis.
Maybe Jake White will change that, who knows. Michalak may have just been using his own ability and not following structured plays when at the Sharks.
When Lambie came in as 2nd reciever on multiphase play when Michalak was 10 he was more effective.
07 Jan 2014, 08:37#10
Oh give it a rest, Faggot!!
We all know that chopping and changing all season long won't help anyone establish himself as a serious contender.
Lambie is to be given an extended run at 10. We will see what he has to offer come seasons end.

sharkbok
Captain23,297 posts

sharkbokCaptain23,297 posts
07 Jan 2014, 08:52#11
Clevermike, initially I thought that Frans Steyn was the problem, but then even when he did get injured and the likes of Bosman played at 12 their was still problems.
Even with Lambie playing at flyhalf for the boks the backline never seems to get going. It just seems like a disjointed unit that was introduced to each other 5 minutes before match.
Boesman had his best season before leaving the Sharks last year.
I believe in other seasons he was allways carrying injuries so he did not provide the same form as what he did for the Cheetas except for in the last season when he was sufficient. In other seasons he was pathetic.
Will see this year to be sure, but I would like to see Swiel get some runs of the bench and by mid tournament if he out performs Lambie then they can switch positions.
07 Jan 2014, 15:14#16
Lambie is overrated and has never lived up to the hype. The sun does not shine out of Steyn's bum, but Lambie is certainly not the answer to SA's no.10 hopes. Bring on Goosen!
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
07 Jan 2014, 15:30#17
Okay CC.....tell us how many times Lambie played consecutively at 10 last season. Then explain what you mean by "chopping and changing ". Or depart to join your new buddies if you wish.....there wont be one poster asking you to stay. Kinda says it all, doesn't it?
07 Jan 2014, 16:06#18
Faggot ... no one can be expected to cement a spot in the national side if he's been earmarked as a jack of all trades and then benched as cover for both. Chopping and changing from position to position helps no one.
You honestly wanted me to explain that to you? Thought it was pretty much obvious.
I don't need your approval, poof!!. I'll post wherever I choose.
Now explain to me what it is I supposedly said against this site.
07 Jan 2014, 16:17#19
Well common, Faggot!!
I'm waiting!!!
STSun-Tzu
Club Pro713 posts
07 Jan 2014, 17:23#22
Lambie cannot play at 10 because he cannot make decisions or handle pressure, end of story. He is very nervy and hesitant, of this I have seen in every game. His running onto the ball is not nearly as effective in other positions either, rather, he looks more natural at fullback. But is he a test quality fullback? Not particularly. It is cruel on Morné's behalf to neglect Lambie's mistimed run which blew our 2011 World Cup campaign. We hear that Lambie must have an extended run? He has played the vast majority of his games at all levels in the flyhalf position over the past three years. Three years! Morné by contrast won the second Lions test coming off the bench, in starting his second he scored all 31 points against the All Blacks (A try, conversion, penalties and drop goal). Then we hear Michael's bleatings; Morné is the worst flyhalf ever in the whole wide world. The reality? He has the second highest points average of all Springboks past and present, second only to Jannie De Beer, who only played 13 tests. To maintain such a figure with 54 tests is nothing short of astonishing. If the pretenders are so much better, often touted as ten times to a hundred times better, where does their contribution yield ten to a hundred times the improvement? All emotional huff and puff and too little rational thinking. The challenge was presented to Lambie and the rest and they were nothing but a tame blowout, even Goosen who was easily handled by New Zealand. Quite why this is still a debate is beyond me, certainly the debate was settled in no uncertain terms on the field of play, and that is beyond dispute.
MDMonkey D Luffy
Pro6,277 posts
MDMonkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
07 Jan 2014, 17:27#23
i didnt think it was possible, but goldberg is even scarier than usual, o_O
fact - mornes boot is all hes good for.
fact - lambies boot is not as effective as mornes, buts its still class. but lambie has the added bonus of having all the other tools needed to be an effective flyhalf in todays game.
STSun-Tzu
Club Pro713 posts
07 Jan 2014, 17:30#24
Sasuke, your acumen of South African rugby players is embarrassingly shot. Your post fatally discredits you.
07 Jan 2014, 20:13#27
Ag ou Mike, you are becoming so flippin boring. How many games has Morne Steyn played last year? How many games was he "below par" (in your opinion)? You keep on pissing about two games, i.e. the one against the Brumbies and the Ellis Park test, as if he was the sole player responsible for those losses. It is not even worth responding to the bullshit that you spit out. You keep on fabricating your own bullshit to suit your own silly little agenda. You are like a little boy with a whole box full of toys to play with but you prefer to keep on sucking on one dirty old fucked up dummy. Make that two dirty old fucked up dummies. I forgot about Alberts for a moment.
08 Jan 2014, 08:28#31
There was a time when Morne oozed confidence out of ever orifice.
He made his little flip passes and Carter type chip kicks over the top and placed a lot of pressure on the opposition. He was unpredicatable.
This was however short lived.
He is not the same man today.
What we have today is an average flyhalf who doesn't contribute much more than with his goal kicking.
He stands too deep, doesn't have the best of defenses and sadly can implode at a moments notice.
We unfortunately do not have anyone better and until someone steps up it's best we keep Morne in the 10 jersey.
Lambie with his extended run at 10 may blossom this year. Time will tell.