FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Law Changes

Law Changes

Started by Ek3 REPLIES261 VIEWS· 16 May 2012, 02:00
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
EK
EkPro1,464 posts
16 May 2012, 09:29
#1
16 May 2012, 09:29#1

ex: KEO

IRB tweaks laws

16 May 2012

   The IRB has sanctioned a global trial of five aspects of law amendments following an extensive process of evaluation.    

The trial, approved by the IRB Council at its Annual Meeting in Dublin on Tuesday, will commence at the start of the next season in each hemisphere (August 2012 in the north and January 2013 in the south) and will be applicable to both international and domestic competition.

Aspects of law approved for trial include limiting the time that the ball is available at the back of a ruck and the positioning of taking a quick throw-in. In addition to the suite of five laws approved for global trial, three additional trials will operate during 2012.

A trial extension of the jurisdiction of the Television Match Official will be introduced later this year, while the number of nominated replacements in Test rugby will be increased to eight for a trial in the November window.

The global trial has been sanctioned after an unprecedented evaluation process that kicked off with submissions and recommendations for 20 potential amendments from member unions and has culminated with recent trials of amendments to seven aspects of law as a package at dedicated playing environments in Cambridge and Stellenbosch.

This evaluation process is in line with the remit of the Laws Amendment Process approved by the IRB Council in December 2009.

Unlike previous amendment processes, the process of selection, monitoring and evaluation has been steered by an independent Laws Representative Group, comprising technical representatives from each of the 10 Tier-1 unions covering elite and community rugby and representatives of the IRB Rugby Committee.

Extensive evaluation of the Cambridge and Stellenbosch University trials undertaken earlier this year determined that each of the seven amendments could have a positive effect on the game or clarify existing areas of law and therefore a recommendation was made to the IRB Council via the IRB Rugby Committee to approve a global trial of all seven amendments.

The five law amendments to be trialled globally are:

1. Law 16.7 (Ruck): The ball has to be used within five seconds of it being made available at the back of a ruck following a warning from the referee to “use it”. Sanction – Scrum.

2. 19.2 (b) (Quick Throw-In) For a quick throw in, the player may be anywhere outside the field of play between the line of touch and the player’s goal line.

3. 19.4 (who throws in) When the ball goes into touch from a knock-on, the non-offending team will be offered the choice of a lineout at the point the ball crossed the touch line; or a scrum at the place of the knock-on. The non-offending team may exercise this option by taking a quick throw-in.

4. 21.4 Penalty and free kick options and requirements: Lineout alternative. A team awarded a penalty or a free kick at a lineout may choose a further lineout, they throw in. This is in addition to the scrum option.

5. A conversion kick must be completed within one minute 30 seconds from the time that a try has been awarded.

In addition to the global trials, the IRB Council approved three specific additional trials:

1. A trial to extend the jurisdiction of the TMO to incidents within the field of play that have led to the scoring of a try and foul play in the field of play to take place at an appropriate elite competition in order that a protocol can be developed for the November 2012 Tests.

2. A trial has been sanctioned for the November 2012 Test window permitting international teams to nominate up to eight replacements in the match day squad for Test matches. In line with current practice at domestic elite Rugby level, the additional player must be a qualified front row player.

3. An amendment to Law 3.4 (Sevens Variation) to enable Sevens teams to nominate up to five replacements/substitutes. Under the revision, which will operate from June 1 2012, a team may substitute or replace up to five players during a match. Approval has been granted on player welfare grounds to recognise the additional demands on players and squads owing to the expansion of the Sevens World Series where there are three blocks of three events on consecutive weekends.

Council also approved the referral by the Laws Representative Group of one potential Law amendment that was successfully trialled at Cambridge and Stellenbosch for further consideration by the specialist Scrum Steering Group (overseeing scrum force project) to be considered alongside the ongoing review of the scrum.

The amendment that will be considered by the group relates to the engagement sequence and will see the referee call “crouch” then “touch”. The front rows crouch then touch and using outside arm each prop touches the point of the opposing prop’s outside shoulder. The props then withdraw their arms. The referee will then call “set” when the front rows are ready. The front rows may then set the scrum

       

 

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
16 May 2012, 12:21
#2
16 May 2012, 12:21#2

The idea of limiting the time for a scrummie to play the ball in a ruck has been coming for some time, and there are numerous debates about referees, and their "discretion". The scrums are a shambles and one of the issues with it is the timing between the crouch............touch..................... pause................ and engage commands by the referee. While I am in favour of the scrummie waiting ages to get the ball going again, I can foresee a lot of cricizing about this again. I will not be surprised to hear refs being accused of being biased and allowing one team to take longer to use the ball from the rucks than the other teams.

EK
EkPro1,464 posts
16 May 2012, 12:28
#3
16 May 2012, 12:28#3

As long as there are laws there will always be complaints :)

However I actually disagree with the time limit for the scrummie, I don't want it limited, maybe i am old school, however this takes another strategic choice away from a scrumhalf when to play timing etc. Sometmimes play it late when a loosie tends to play up too fast and catching him off side etc.

I might be old school I think but i like rugby and the more the rules change the more it truns into the candyfloss game. I am strting to side with the European guys on this and think it's the influence from NZ and Aus.

This whole touch pause engage thing as well, the whole scrum is a shambles as they want the contest safer, but alas the game has to progress, I would like however for them to take into account what makes the gmae good, and not just a fast paced league type game, keep it unigue, the way Union should be Union.

RO
RocketGirlRookie31 posts
17 May 2012, 21:58
#4
17 May 2012, 21:58#4

I need to make notes. This stuff is a challenge, but i am sure i can pick up the finer details soon enough. I think the game has become a bit too soft, when my dad used to play you could have sworn he was going to lose a limb or two. Nowadays there are moments when you wish the men would be men again.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news