Let me describe the Sharks performance in four letters

It was complete and total SH!T.    This is some performance that caused them the game.

First of all the fact is that the ball handling of the Sharks was total BS.   The worst was their no 6 and there were virtually every one else.   When tackled they lose possession in tackles.

Three of the Waratahs tries came from BS kicks.   That is why they did not deserve to win.

I was disappointed in Robert du Preez - he was part of the problem and not a very convincing flyhalf.   

The one where there was some signs of life was AM - but that rubbish he produced in the latter part of the game when he made a total rubbish pass was clearly a serious question mark as to his suitability.

Explain why you think the Stormers will end bottom of log. Hahahhahahaha

I thought the Crusaders were stronger in the scrums and they were not.   Please note that three of the four tries of the Stormers were scored by their props and the fourth by a lock,   They gave the Stormers team some respectability.   Other than De Allende their backline was BS,

You cannot have midgets on the wing - especially if they are defensive liabilities and poor under high balls.    .  

3 letters... KAK . Iyou want 4, go for KAAK!

Mozart 

The most idiotic of all - the final results of round 2 are not out yet,   At this stage I am in thee top 5% of all circa 9500 participants and that is pretty good,    May go higher but will inform you onn Tuesday what is going on,

Not really necessary  since you are too cowardly and stupid to participate.