FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Lethal Louw a lone ranger

Lethal Louw a lone ranger

Started by Beeno114 REPLIES492 VIEWS· 06 Sept 2013, 14:15
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
06 Sept 2013, 14:15
#1
06 Sept 2013, 14:15#1

Ex Keo

 Francois Louw will fight a lone battle to limit the Australians, but it won’t be enough for a Bok victory.

 

Louw is the most improved of the Springboks in the last 12 months. He is as good, if not better, than Michael Hooper as an out and out fetcher, but he also contributes more generally than Hooper.

Neither yet has the all-round influence of All Blacks captain Richie McCaw, but when it comes to fetcher on fetcher two of the game’s best will be on display in Brisbane.(Well one plays within the laws and the other doesnt - also once you have a groupie fan base you needn't be on the field to have a good game- we saw this continually with matfield)

There is healthy respect between the two camps, but as I’ve written all week I think the balance of respective loose-trios favours Australia.

I also think the Australians will get enough phase ball from the lineout to be effective. Their scrum is poor and took a beating against the All Blacks. I believe they will struggle as much in the scrums against the Springboks.

It is the only area of the game I see a significant Bok advantage and the lineout strength of both teams is on a par.

South Africa isn’t as dominant in the lineout without the likes of Victor Matfield and Andries Bekker, especially when contesting.

The Boks will always bring physicality to the contest but I’d have like to have seen a selection, less physical but more mobile for this specific match-up.

Quade Cooper and Will Genia, as a combination, will be effective in Brisbane and expect Israel Folau to have an influence.

I have Louw to play a big game, but I also have the Wallabies winning by 7, possibly as much as 10 points.

7 points is a close call so Mike be warned your 20 plus is looking over the top?

RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
06 Sept 2013, 15:55
#2
06 Sept 2013, 15:55#2

"Lethal Louw the Lone Ranger"

 

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahaha!

 

More like "Feeble Flou the Faint-hearted Fairy"

 

Francois Louw is just another in the long line of ridiculously overrated WP loose forwards - like Skinstad, Koster, Krige, Brink, Burger etc - who get hyped up by the WP spin-doctors to the point where SA fans believe they're rugby superstars when they're actually bog ordinary plodders.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
06 Sept 2013, 16:04
#3
06 Sept 2013, 16:04#3
Louw is not a bad loosie, certainly not worthy of a test starting spot as a fetcher. There are a number of true fetchers who should be starting ahead of him. He has had the odd good test but he is not our answer at 6
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
06 Sept 2013, 16:32
#4
06 Sept 2013, 16:32#4
The article is right in one respect - Louw is the only loosie of some value in the Springbok squad - the rest are restricted to about 5% of total requirements - while he is at about 30%. He is too slow to be an effective fetcher and they are wrong - Hooper is 100% better than him. I always rated Louw as a player - but I personally think he is not a 6 - perhaps he should be played at 8.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
06 Sept 2013, 17:08
#5
06 Sept 2013, 17:08#5
There's the laughable RIProoi, no doubt energized by some atheist bash, tearing into WP again. Schalk is no good, Skinstad is no good.....Louw is no good. Fair enough everybody has a right to his opinion. - So who were RIP's big picks......would you believe Luke Watson? And his other defining pick was Deysel ahead of Juan Smith......hahahahahahahaha. I guess I'll' take his views on WP flankers with a pinch of salt.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
06 Sept 2013, 17:31
#6
06 Sept 2013, 17:31#6
Rooinek Don't worry about Mozart - he will pick out players you have supported five or more years ago and try and discredit your present comments. The difference is Mozart supports all out the rubbish selections of Meyer - after the fact - he will never come forth with anything different. He - being the coward he is - never looks at the future. He consequently believes that there is nothing he can get wrong - so he would shout and scream about others - while they cannot return the favour. The discoverer of flowery terms - like powerful ball-carrier, bone crushing tackler and mighty rugger - can be faulted because the players he ascribed those qualities to never do what Mozart says they do. Watch out for the game tomorrow and see what happens. We can have lots of fun with him afterwards.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
06 Sept 2013, 17:37
#7
06 Sept 2013, 17:37#7
Oh shame the poor OOM is cuddling up to the atheist....looking for help wherever he can find it!
RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
06 Sept 2013, 17:38
#8
06 Sept 2013, 17:38#8

Ou Maaik, trust me, I don't worry about what a deceitful, self-important and incredibly childish loser thinks about me, rugby or anything else.

 

Moffie is best treated with the contempt he so richly deserves. Frankly I'm surprised anyone even bothers reading his pathetic posts or his whiny comments. I certainly don't.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
06 Sept 2013, 17:44
#9
06 Sept 2013, 17:44#9
Mozart You have missed the point - this happens to be a rugby discussions forum - not one dealing with a person's personal beliefs- religious or otherwise. However, one can clearly see what you are about - you use all types of things to discredit members and since you are afraid to substantiate you notoriously poor comments by fact and is often found lying about issues - one knows what to expect from you.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
06 Sept 2013, 17:46
#10
06 Sept 2013, 17:46#10
Any port in a storm RIP....now the Board idiot is your friend. Just funny that he bashes me for bringing up past players when you started this with a rant about Skinstad and Krige. Stupid hey?
JE
JeromeVClub Pro492 posts
06 Sept 2013, 17:58
#11
06 Sept 2013, 17:58#11

Typical from Rooinek the anti WP/Stormers poster, Louw is overrated? The ones that are doubting Louws ability are definitely speaking too soon, he is a key all round flanker that knows his role well. In comparison with Hooper he is a quick backrow player that is hard to bring down but lacks the physicality that Louw and Alberts have. There is question marks whether or not Hooper will front up. Im expecting the boks forwards to dominate the Aus forwards and I think Louw could play a big part in that.

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
06 Sept 2013, 23:28
#12
06 Sept 2013, 23:28#12

slow louw the soft starnger, LMAO, :oP

after mozter mentioned how he thought this was the storngest Bok pack ever, IMO they should have then started kolisi, his speed at being able to get round the park and do the link work will come in more handy,

but louw is a better fetcher thoughm only problem is how effective is he going to pilfering, the wallys have the ability to get to the vast majortiy of all breakdowns beofre their counter parts do, epsecially in the latter part of the game, and hooper who IMO is the fastest loosie around is going to thrive in todays enviroment.

kinetic kolisi the killer danger, hmmmmmmm kkk danger, o_O
might come up with something better, LMAO, :oP

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
06 Sept 2013, 23:34
#13
06 Sept 2013, 23:34#13

 Louw is not the better fetcher, he does no fetching

DD
dan danRookie46 posts
07 Sept 2013, 01:30
#14
07 Sept 2013, 01:30#14

 Our three best fetchers are 1.Brussow 2.Fourie 3.Louw

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
07 Sept 2013, 01:42
#15
07 Sept 2013, 01:42#15

Wrong dan dan, our best 3 fetchers/opensides are Brussouw, Kolisi and Fourie. Kriel impresses me the more I see him.........so we have four who are worthy

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news