FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Lood de Jager (RSA vs B&I Lions 2021 T2)

Lood de Jager (RSA vs B&I Lions 2021 T2)

Started by Augenöffner23 REPLIES1,913 VIEWS· 02 Aug 2021, 01:00
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
02 Aug 2021, 01:00
#1
02 Aug 2021, 01:00#1

Lood de Jager (S19)

56:06 - S.L/O: Lifter for S4. Stationary maul. S19 pulled out and uninvolved before S9 kicks

57:01 - L.L/O: L4 allows S19 to get in front of him throughout setup and then darts out of lineout. Deep throw to L5, who has S19 in front of him and on the ball. Boks do not fall for the ploy, S19 steals ball.

58:31 - L.Scrum: Boks penalised

58:50 - Lion high ball, S10 gathers uncontested, goes to ground immediately. S16 immediately present to secure ball. Ref already has arm up in favour of Boks. S10 jumps into L14, who didn't lay a hand on S10 until he was legally challengeable. Very bad call here. 

59:55 - S.L/O: [11.4.19-21-5.18]. S6 designated receiver. S19 jumper. Challenged by L4. Maul. Boks drive deep into Lion's 22. S9 grubbers for S13 to dot down. 

61:31 - S19 secures restart. Straight to ground. 

61:54 - Boks hack up field twice after restart. S19 advances up slowly as Lion kicks. S13 secures high ball, S19 slowly retreats and joins ruck. S17 powers over ball to secure unclean possession. S10 kicks to the corner from just outside Bok 22.

63:03 - L.L/O: Short ball to front backfires for Lions. They lose ground and ruck forms. S19 joins ruck and guards ball that has been turned over. 

63:22 - Ruck: S22 short to S19, who is calling for the ball. Tries to power his way into contact, taken down by L4 as he falls to ground. Boks moving laterally, and not making any ground. S22 eventually sends a high ball. 

64:08 - S19 attempts to pressure kicker deep in Lion's half. 

65:11 - S.L/O: [17.4.19--5.18]. S6 designated receiver between two units. S19 lifter for S4. L4 drives into S19, pushes him towards touchline and out of maul immediately. S22 to S10 to S12, chip into touch just outside Bok 22. L17 penalised for side entry into maul.

66:20 - S.L/O: [17.4.19--5.18]. S6 designated receiver between two units. S19 lifter for S4. Uncontested throw. Maul. S19 goes straight to ground and no longer part of maul. 

66:42 - Boks with 4 man POD (5.19.18.17) in middle of field. Lions mark up, but don't buy the screen, slide to the right. S10 behind POD, S10-(S15)-S12. S12 has space to advance into passive edge defence, but passively passes very short to S6 who gets caught and dragged down along touchline. There was a chance for a 2v1 but S12 blew it. Boks lose ball. Thankfully Boks had advantage here. 

67:36 - S.L/O: [4.19.21--5.18]. S6 designated receiver between units. S19 lifter for S4. Maul.

68:02 - POD (19.05.04) outside S22. Arrowhead formation. S22 to S5. S19 flops onto ruck with side entrance. Should be called by ref here. S22 high ball into Lion's 22.

69:16 - S.Scrum. Collapses on loosehead side. Boks have penalty advantage. S22 to S12, S12 advances up, angling out, attempts short ball to S13. No cohesion at all. S12 flicks ball up and behind S13, behind S13's head. S13 loses ball forward struggling to gather it from behind whilst defenders are upon him. Poor skills and vision from S12. S12 only had to slip a ball about one foot to get S13 between the defenders. Jean and Fourie did this effortlessly!

71:04 - Restart. S19 lifted by S16 and S18. Gathers restart. Crawls for a few inches as he goes to ground. 

71:28 - S22 sends a shallow high ball up deep in Bok half. S19 fails to track ball, which bobbles before L4 gathers and quickly sets free with slick pass. 

72:44 - S.L/O: [17.4.19-21-5.18] S20 designated receiver outside S21. S19 lifter for S4. Maul. S19 falls to ground as maul advances, gets up and rejoins a few seconds later. L20 takes a shot at S19 on the side, but he takes it. Maul advances sidways a little before stalling. S18 takes ball and darts on short side. S19 slowly moves behind pod setup outside S22, acts a screen for the deep lying S10 on the subsequent phase. S10 kicks high into Lions 22. Boks awarded penalty for knock-on in air, but last touch from S10 sent ball back towards Boks. Wrong call. 

74:03 - S.Scrum: First truly dominant Bok scrum of the series. Very stable and powered the Lions backwards. Boks win penalty, great work in particular by S17 at loosehead. 

75:52 - First phase off restart. Four man POD (17.18.21.19) outside S22. S19 trails the front three in a loose offset box formation. S18 carrier. S19 guards cleaned ruck as S21 disengages and retreats to the short side. S22 with a high ball.

76:10 - S5 absolutely hammered L22. L22 gets up, and is taken low by S19 who is in pursuit. 

77:12 - S.L/O: [17-5-19.21-5.18] S20 designated receiver. S19 lifter for S4. Maul. S22 to S19 who clumsily loses short ball. 

78:00 - S12 gathers loose ball and gets taken to ground. Next phase, S22 to tight POD (20.19.18), S20 carrier, S19 cleaner. S22 high ball. 

78:30 - L18 advances into S19, who takes him front-on. L18 absorbs the impact and spins in tackle, thus breaking S19's tackle attempt. S21 grabs L18 and S20 puts him down. Boks win turnover. S22 short to S12 who grubbers very poorly into touch, missing the free running S15 along the touchline. 

NOTES:

63:18 - S12 gets flat ball. Defender overruns him, allowing S12 to advance a little. Taken low and falls right over. Uncontested ruck

66:31 - Boks have a set play going here. S22 to S12, who hops onto the ball. Literally hops. Lands in the face of two defenders. S21 comes up outside of him, as a screen. Nobody buys it. S12 short to S10 without fixing a defender, S10 now has two defenders cleanly in front and onto him before he even receives the b all. S10 holds the ball and attempts to draw L22 successfully, passes short to S11. No space for him, and the Lions swarm all over S11. Boks are very slow to reorganise and secure ball. 

67:54 - S.Maul. S22 to S12. S12 attempts a hit up, but is thumped backwards a good distance. Three cleaners struggle to assist S12 and secure possession. 

71:58 - Lions finally get some phases going, with the Bok defence languidly moving around the field. S16 makes a decisive steal which kills the attack dead in its tracks. During the subsequent phases, S19 was shifting around trying to guard the fringes, was generally in position, but without an active influence on play. 

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
02 Aug 2021, 02:56
#2
02 Aug 2021, 02:56#2

But, but….Lood was an 8, he changed the whole game when he came on, or so they say.

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
02 Aug 2021, 06:28
#3
02 Aug 2021, 06:28#3

And Damian was integral to the Bok cause. Both unskilled and overpowered. Reviewing this made me even more disappointed by how poor the Boks have been. 

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Aug 2021, 08:32
#4
02 Aug 2021, 08:32#4

I started reading the above and was amazed by the BS as expected.   What happened at the first scrum is totally false as per normal.    I  did not bother to waste my time and read the rest of the hogwash. .   

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
02 Aug 2021, 16:08
#5
02 Aug 2021, 16:08#5

Do shut up Pervert your aping of Dave’s points is embarrassing.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Aug 2021, 16:35
#6
02 Aug 2021, 16:35#6

No Mozart

According to you BS is your first language of note and I find it rather difficult to understand BS  as used by prejudiced and twisted minds.     

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
02 Aug 2021, 17:01
#7
02 Aug 2021, 17:01#7

How predictable. Lügnerin disagrees with everything. Well then, tell me what "did" happen. As it is, Lood was almost a non-factor and Damian was a carthorse who "buggered up badly".

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
02 Aug 2021, 18:05
#8
02 Aug 2021, 18:05#8

Oi pointed pout about where you blamed De Jager for the  scrum penalty  after i pointed out it was BS.   Anyway - why include the story of the scrum if the whole essay was about De Jager's performance?      

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
02 Aug 2021, 18:20
#9
02 Aug 2021, 18:20#9

I didn't blame Lood you dolt, but I did describe the outcome of a facet he was involved in. Was he too weak scrumming? Did he tire after that first line out? I'll let you decide.

We can learn a fair bit from the wider details. Such as just how dour and ineffective this Skop 'N Pop gameplan is. 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
02 Aug 2021, 23:01
#10
02 Aug 2021, 23:01#10
Imagine reading through that much shit Must be a bit deflating going to that much effort to compile that amount of shit only to have Moz read it and nod his predictable approval You could not pay me enough to read your shit
AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
02 Aug 2021, 23:58
#11
02 Aug 2021, 23:58#11

I do it for me, and that's why I wipe the floor with you each and every day I post.

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
03 Aug 2021, 00:06
#12
03 Aug 2021, 00:06#12
You keep believing that flower
AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
03 Aug 2021, 00:53
#13
03 Aug 2021, 00:53#13

Of course, you just know everything. The kak praat who likes to be surrounded by ja brus. You've been absolutely smashed in every debate. Lately you're too cowardly to engage any more than the usual Lügnerin cop-out. You're a neo-lib snowflake, and I own you. Ende. 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
03 Aug 2021, 01:32
#14
03 Aug 2021, 01:32#14
I don’t bother debating with predictable ignorant pricks You are so fucking stupid you claim victories of debates that have never taken place Do you honestly think I would waste my time debating rugby with someone so profoundly off the mark that any effort invested in engaging with you would be a complete waste of time I literally never take anything you say about rugby seriously in fact I hardly ever read your stuff beyond the first few sentences We agree on one solitary thing and that’s the du Preez twins and that’s where it ends Now listen here fuckwit do us all a favour and stop embarrassing yourself claiming victories and ownership That kind of talk merits nothing less than a fist in the face. Unfortunately you are nowhere near me, so a hiding is never on the cards Now be a sport and fuck off you boring prick
AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
03 Aug 2021, 08:20
#15
03 Aug 2021, 08:20#15

Ah, there we see the true Dave. Fortunately for you your are nowhere near me to do something so stupid. I'm not a fat, out of shape old man. That line was very funny, filled with futile emotional bluster.

As for claiming victories for things that never happened? Where and when? Unteromlett yet again lying. Is that surprising given the company he keeps?

No Unteromlett, you are the classic plastic: you have an opinion based on nothing but feelings. It's sometimes called "the eye test" etc. You're involved enough to insult people, to "lay down the law", but not enough to have a real debate or enough to exchange ideas. In a classic bar setting, you'd be the loud mouth who can't handle his drink, get confrontational and end up bloody nosed and tossed out the back into a cluster of bins. Stumbling home. You'd from then on talk of how tough you were that night, leaving your ja bru in-group in awe of your might and scant wit. In reality, you're just know-nothing Saffy. You want to press a point against people who do some research and talk at a level that is simply too much for you. So you become frustrated and angered. You can't accept that your tiny little bubble of ideas are in danger. You are too helpless to defend it. Quite sad, and weak.

Right here, we have the bare bone facts. Not opinions. Each reference is there to be challenged, if possible. No insults, no emotion, just the plain as day truth. It causes the plastics to scurry away like cockroaches, into every shadow corner and crevasse. In your mind, insulting me is a win, that disengaging with the material is a win. If you insult the material, you somehow discredit it. In fact, you expose your weakness, cowardice and limitations. Therefore I own you emotionally and intellectually. Have a nice day, "Big Guy".


CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
03 Aug 2021, 09:20
#16
03 Aug 2021, 09:20#16

Unfortunately I saw the lying Kindergarten Imbecile and when I pointed out his tommyrot - he quickly changed it.   I should have commented on all his BS and he would have change that too.  This imbecile tries to make out his  BS stories about what happened in matches is really true - while the exact opposite is the case.   A waste of time and space to read whatever h comes up with.        

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
03 Aug 2021, 09:30
#17
03 Aug 2021, 09:30#17

Changed what? Everything is as posted. You can't read Lügnerin. You have made a fool of yourself many a time due to your illiteracy. It doesn't help that you have severely underdeveloped comprehension skills. You assumed that I blamed Lood for the penalty, then tried to back your way out of it by lying. You are big fat liar who lies out of his lying hole daily.

Anyway, as it stands, Lood is exposed. So too Damian. Job done. 

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
03 Aug 2021, 13:10
#18
03 Aug 2021, 13:10#18
Omelette have we met that you have me as fat? Or are you just lying like you always do? You are the most ignorant poster I have ever come across and for that very reason no one engages you But you are far too stupid to realise that You post and no one reads or responds other than tell inform you that you are a complete idiot Man oh man I’d love to give you a snot klap
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
03 Aug 2021, 13:33
#19
03 Aug 2021, 13:33#19

i am sick of reading crap the Kindergarten Imbecile posted.   The whole story above - supposed to eb dealing with De Jager and De Allende is crap.   Take for instance 56:06.   Standard procedure of loosies to protect the scrummie in the case of mauls.   Nothing weird there 

57:01   The simple truth is that De Jager outjumped his opposing jumpers and gathered the ball firmly in both hands. and the effort is to blame the Lions for the loss and discredit  De Jager for the fact that he stole the ball.       

58:31  Originally The KI had a longer saga blaming de Jager for the penalty.   When I p[ointed out it was BS - he removed the De Jager  issue  and left the sentence in - still did not contain a word about De  Jager  - while the objective was to deal with his assessment of De Jager and De Allende. 

Every other description is a  distorted version as to what really happened. and some is vagie and consequently a cover for lying.

That kind of analysis is worthless and total garbage in fact.   Did not look any further. than that at the  BS at all/

               

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
03 Aug 2021, 13:52
#20
03 Aug 2021, 13:52#20
You are so eager to be contrary that you don't even know what you are reading, much less what you are saying. My descriptions for those times are exactly right. 

"The simple truth is that Lood out-jumped his opposing jumpers"


How did he get the ball? I didn't merely say "Lood jumped and got the ball", I explained what the Lions were doing you dolt! Where did I discredit Lood in that lineout? You are a total sham Lugies. 

58:31 - I changed nothing. You, yet again, jumped the gun and claimed something that never was. You are a very dishonest person Lugies. I said the Boks were penalised, I never at any point said anything other than that. 

Here's the truth: The match footage doesn't match your impression of his performance. How many times has this been the case? You and Unteromlett are always blown up when the video comes out. shall I upload the video with the timestamps for easy access? I may just do that. Run littel piggies, run, but you cannot hide! 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
03 Aug 2021, 14:54
#21
03 Aug 2021, 14:54#21

No - it does  match your crazy idea to demerit De Jager's performance.  

SE
SebPro2,680 posts
03 Aug 2021, 15:02
#22
03 Aug 2021, 15:02#22

Organ wrote after disappearing for a long time...He reappeared as Lurker, but quickly changed to Augenoffner (Eye Opener)

"So, yeah, I may not post again (you'll all be relieved to hear that haha). I don't really like to post just read, but I had to get that off my chest."  

LOL, for a guy that does not like to post but prefers to read you sure have a lot to say...


RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
03 Aug 2021, 15:20
#23
03 Aug 2021, 15:20#23
Some of the many names that Omlett has posted under on this board:
AlucardMachiavelliJeromeVAugenoffnerSun TzuLestatLurkerGonzo the GreatDesert FoxDezert FoxRequiescatUsernameCarpetmuncherMamboIhiApollo 13EkAristocat
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
03 Aug 2021, 16:39
#24
03 Aug 2021, 16:39#24

Rooinek 

Thanks for the list - I thought from memory he ahd 8 user names before his present one  - but t is double that.

Tje problem with the idiot is he painted himself into an embarrassing corner  with supreme idiocy as a base and when totally embarrassed he ran away - coming back a few months later witha  difference user name.

Thjrough his stupidity he betrayed himself within a month after he registered the new name.     

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news