SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
18 Aug 2019, 23:56#1
It’s not even close. It’s simple - Lood imposes himself physically on attack and defence - Mostert can’t.
RG had a quiet game - Lood was very good - on the strength of that Lood deserves to partner Etzebeth with RG on the bench
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
19 Aug 2019, 00:03#2
Same old claptrap....where's that physicality contrast between Stephanie and Mostert you keep promising Dave?
Lomp was done after 20 minutes.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
19 Aug 2019, 00:08#4
I promised nothing I said I’d do it I’m just reluctant to troll through a whole test again
Mostert was useless in contact, Lood on the other hand carried defenders with ball in hand and drove players backwards in defence - something little Mostert could only dream about
The contrast shown in the two games on a physical front was huge. Mostert is weak with zero grunt....Lood and Elstadt showed plenty of grunt
MOMozart
Captain49,914 posts
MOMozartCaptain49,914 posts
19 Aug 2019, 00:23#6
Okay just hot air again Dave. I watched Lomp carefully....yesterday, there was no physicality. He was energetic for the first 20 minutes after which he totally disappeared except for lineouts....which he called for himself constantly.
Five runs for 12 metres with 2 balls lost.
SASaffolk
Captain30,741 posts
SASaffolk Captain30,741 posts
19 Aug 2019, 01:07#7
Bullshit Lood was good all game - 12m for a lock in 5 runs is bloody good as they were all or mostly in traffic something Mostert can’t do.
Mostert gained metres in open play with one run that had him running many metres
