FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Ludeke siad Matfield will improiov

Ludeke siad Matfield will improiov

Started by clevermike15 REPLIES210 VIEWS· 16 Feb 2014, 22:10
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
16 Feb 2014, 22:10
#1
16 Feb 2014, 22:10#1

Gere is the comments of Ludeke:-


"Bulls coach Frans Ludeke believes Victor Matfield will improve as the season progresses as he continueshis comeback.

The Springbok legend, who came out of retirement last month, appeared off the bench in the second half of Saturday's loss to the Sharks in a tough start to the Bulls'  Super Rugby campaign.

Ludeke, whose side scored a late consolation through Jono Ross, was  satisfied with Matfield.

"I thought that the longer he played, the better he became," said Ludeke.

"But he's a classy player and had immediate impacts in the line-out. He will just get better as the competition goes on, that I have no doubt about."

"This must be the easiest way the Sharks have ever beaten us," added the coach.

"We conceded so many soft turnovers and gave away two easy tries. That gave them the momentum for the game. So we lost against ourselves I feel, particularly in that first half."


Now lets get to Matfield - his line out work was nothing to note.   The first line out he was penalised for trying to take Du Toit out  in the air and for the rest of the games he took two line out balls,  


Matfield was not really an improvement on the Bulls performances up front and if that is what he is capable of  and he does not improve as the season goes on - he should never gave attempted a cone back.  From what I have seen - he was bog ordinary abd bit really better than Willemse - who obviously has more muscle  power than Matfield has.


AJ
Arthur JohnPro1,748 posts
17 Feb 2014, 01:54
#2
17 Feb 2014, 01:54#2
 It was painful to watch Victor on the field.
HE HAS TO FACE UP TO IT THAT HE IS OVER THE HILL AND ON THE DOWNSLOPE.
Our group of Saffers watching the game all agreed that he is past tense and if he continues he will ruin his reputation as one of the best line out players of modern time.
Sorry to see it happen but hope he makes the right decision..... and soon.


SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
17 Feb 2014, 02:02
#3
17 Feb 2014, 02:02#3
 He was pathetic, was physically owned
DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
17 Feb 2014, 02:56
#4
17 Feb 2014, 02:56#4
 Let's wait and see, there's a long way to go. On the other side of the coin, why get him back?....why can't they develop the next Matfield or Mark Andrews?
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
17 Feb 2014, 10:03
#5
17 Feb 2014, 10:03#5
 "The first line out he was penalised for trying to take Du Toit out  in the air and for the rest of the games he took two line out balls,............." 

Difference was that he was penalised for that while Du Toit did the same without being penalised.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
17 Feb 2014, 10:07
#6
17 Feb 2014, 10:07#6

Dof Doos


The world of Dof Doos is so unfair - we have to accept that.   Remember the 11th commandment - Thou shalt not be caught out.


Are you nuts or something????????????   

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
17 Feb 2014, 11:10
#7
17 Feb 2014, 11:10#7
  Fuck off. You cannot get yourself to admit something can you, you sorry piece of shit. The issue is not that one of them was caught out, but rather that they both applied the same illegal tactics, poepol.
ST
Sun-TzuClub Pro713 posts
17 Feb 2014, 12:21
#8
17 Feb 2014, 12:21#8
 Matfield was very comfortable in that game. To suggest otherwise is very dishonest, but that's what we've come to expect from certain members. Will he reach the level of old? I couldn't say, but he didn't look at all out of place. In fact, his conditioning was remarkable, you wouldn't say he had last played a competitive match in 2011. 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
17 Feb 2014, 12:48
#9
17 Feb 2014, 12:48#9

 Sun Tzu


He should have stayed out of the game.   He looked comfortable?   Sure he did - but it was not displayed in his performance.   One thing I was happy about - he was not moonlighting in the backline this time around - but that is likely to change as well.  

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
17 Feb 2014, 12:52
#10
17 Feb 2014, 12:52#10

 Dof Doos


When did it happen in the case of Du Toit - or was it another thing you dreamed up?   It was bloody clear in he Matfield case and he was penalized - while both the line-judge and the ref missed it in a case which you think happened.   Dof Doos at his always wrong stance.

CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
17 Feb 2014, 13:23
#11
17 Feb 2014, 13:23#11
It wouldn't help indicating where and when it happen Sopdoos, you wouldn't believe your own eyes even if it was happened r ight in front you. You are known for not believing your own eyes.
ST
Sun-TzuClub Pro713 posts
17 Feb 2014, 13:38
#12
17 Feb 2014, 13:38#12
It's all in the numbers Ceradyne. For that is where you cannot be faulted.



BE
becsPro4,378 posts
17 Feb 2014, 13:47
#13
17 Feb 2014, 13:47#13
 I think it's a double edged sword really...he'll be judged as either brave or stupid and remembered for the wrong reasons by many if it really does turn out to be a disaster. Which is a real shame.
I think it would have been wise to stay away from the field of play and leave it to the younger man, really. His experience and knowledge is best served as a Coach, if he really wants to be involved in the game.
And he didn't look comfortable out there. Understandably. 


ST
Sun-TzuClub Pro713 posts
17 Feb 2014, 14:12
#14
17 Feb 2014, 14:12#14
The reason he would even consider a return highlights just how much we are struggling at lock. The youngsters just aren't delivering! So we ended last year with Flip and Eben, then there was Bakkies. Who else has delivered? There is a void and opportunity for Victor.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
17 Feb 2014, 14:43
#15
17 Feb 2014, 14:43#15

We are not struggling at lock at all and to suggest we are tells me you are way out of tune with the current lock situation.

 

 

It does not get better than Etzebeth and Steph du Toit........but there is depth in Flip, Lood (another great game this weekend) and the impressive Jacques du Plessis playing 7 for the Bulls.

 

 

There are many more behind these obvious 5.  

ST
Sun-TzuClub Pro713 posts
17 Feb 2014, 14:48
#16
17 Feb 2014, 14:48#16
I'm talking test level. Lood, JdP, SDT are unproven. On the scrap heap are Bekker, Kruger and every other young lock that has been tried to displace Bakkies or Matfield over the last ten years!
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news