No I am not disputing it. All I pointed out that the SA sides have trashed all six of them in the Hurricanes - Sharks game and also in the Bulls - Huricanes game.
Aso may have a remote chance to be considered by the SA franchises - butitis unlikely that that wouldhappen. is remote.
I have referred to the fact that this year all 4 SA teams are in the top 5 insofar as scoring of tries is concerned and they also are tops in line breaks and defenders beaten..
At this stage I am afraid players like Laumape and Crotty will not be considered by any of the four SA sides for selection in the theoretical cicumstances where such contracts will be considered.
There are some deparments where NZ sides have better players overall - but there are others where SA players are better than anything NZ can offer and those are in respect of props, hookers and locks, Then there are where the top players are very even and those include the flyhalfs. where 3 of the five top players are SA players.- with only Barrett and McKenzie being in the top 5. I did not consider Mo-anga because he did not play in enough games to be considered.
Lets face facts there are no fringe NZ players that has a snowballs hope in hell of getting into SA sides; There is a first need for them - strengthen the poor Blues team and get the questionable Chiefs and Highlanders teams to become more competitive so as to win matches without the active help of the especially the NZ referees.
It is a tragedy - but the only worthwhile NZ teams this year are the Crusaders and the Hurricanes and the letter lost against the Bulls and was referee-assisted against the Sharks. What happened in the case where previous years 4 of the top 5 try scoring teams were from NZ and now only one of the teams is in that category?
From what I have seen thus far in Super Rugby - is that the SA teams are improving and the NZ sides staying stagnant or even going down in performance. That should w orry NZ supporters a lot.
.