FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Meyer back to mad scientist

Meyer back to mad scientist

Started by Beeno13 REPLIES55 VIEWS· 06 Nov 2014, 12:10
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
06 Nov 2014, 12:10
#1
06 Nov 2014, 12:10#1

Ex Sport 24


Tank Lanning

The last time the Boks played, they beat the All Blacks! The week before that, they left it late, but powered to a convincing win against the Wallabies. Prior that that, they ran both sides properly close in their own back yards. (RAWS awarded to oz and wee abs)

They are embracing a more ball in hand approach that sees players playing 

what’s in front of them rather than what is in the playbook, yet maintaining 

that 

industrial physical presence the men in green and gold are famous for, they have 

world class human being as a captain, and they are playing with smiles on their faces

again.

There is so much to like about Springbok rugby right now. Yet all I want to do tear 

up my tickets for the game on Saturday evening at the Aviva Stadium and 

instead head tothe Temple Bar to try and temper my anger with a few swiftly 

taken Guinness!

From a balanced bench that saw specialist props Trevor Nyakane and Marcel 

van der 

Merwe covering the stalwart all Shark front row, we are now back to playing 

Grade 5 mad scientist experiments with Coenie Oosthuizen as the backup 

tighthead prop! 

Truly unbelievable!! (Please note snapster!!)

Post team announcement, Heyneke Meyer was quick to remind us that the Boks have

lost two quality tightheads in the space of a few months, those being Frans 

Malherbe and Marcel van der Merwe. Spot on coach. (Please note Dr Mozzz)

Where he was less spot on, though, was in his belief that there aren’t many 

tightheads performing for their respective provinces at present, and that South Africa 

has a dearth of Test-quality No 3s. (Jannie, Malherbe, Marcell and Redlinghuys are hardly a dearth!)

Apart from Julian Redelinghuys, who is on tour and should have been an 

automatic selection this week (As noted by Beeno!!), what the hell has Ruan 

Dreyer been doing in the Currie Cup? 

Destroying the likes of Thomas du Toit, Dale Chadwick and Oosthuizen according to 

my TV. Lourens Adriaanse might not be the world’s most dynamic player, but there he was shoring up a BaaBaas pack against the Wallabies on Saturday. Perhaps the coach gets a different signal via his sponsored Explora decoder?

Meyer’s reason for not picking Lions scrum guru Redelinghuys is that he hasn’t spent 

much time with the squad and doesn’t know the calls or the systems just yet. How 

many calls or systems do you need to know to scrum the crap out of the Irish in the 

last 20 minutes of a game? (It was a lame excuse)

Yes, you tend to get fewer scrums in the last 20 minutes (another reason for front row experimentation given by the coach), but what happens if it’s the single scrum the Boks turnover on their own line that leads to the game winning try?

But what really gets my goat is that Meyer is happy to admit that Oosthuizen’s best 

position is loosehead, yet he has faith in him given his ability to make an impact 

outside of the set piece.

There is no disputing Oosthuizen’s amazing ball carrying, tackling and turnover skills.

I would also have him on my bench, or even in my starting XV. But as a loosehead 

prop! (Agree re hios performance outside the scrum and that he ios better at loosehead!!PLEASE NOTE CC. QUOTAS COULD BE CAUSING CONFUSION HERE? WHO IS BETTER AT LOOSEHARD cOENIE OR TREVOR))

Meyer believes that at 25, he has time to develop into a good tighthead, and if he is 

going to be considered for the World Cup, he needs game time there now. But 

development does not happen in the national side (EXACTLY SO TANK. 

PLEASE NOT BLUEBOK - NEITHER COACHES OR PLAYERS ARE DEVELOPED AT NATIONAL LEVEL. THEY COME IN READY TO DO A JOB!!!). It happens in the 

Vodacom and 

Currie Cup, where you prove to the coach that you can do the job asked of you. 

Oosthuizen still looks like a fish out of water on the right hand side of the 

scrum at 

that level.

It’s a classic coach trap. Gifted a few world class players in one position, instead of 

having the balls to let them fight it out, you try and fit one of them into another 

position. Not only do you prejudice the player being asked to play in an unfamiliar 

position, but you also stifle development of specialists in that position.

No specialist tightheads in South Africa? How would you feel if the national coach was picking a retreaded loosehead who can’t scrum ahead of you?


Well articulated Tank, if only Meyer woould take note of what we are saying. Tank and

Beeno on the same page. 

I hope this is quite clear to all the oaks. 

Tank is a former Western Province tighthead prop who now heads up 

Tankman Media, and sprouts forth on all things rugby on the Front Row Grunt.

BI
biltongbekClub Pro749 posts
06 Nov 2014, 12:18
#2
06 Nov 2014, 12:18#2
 Yeah, I agree on Co enie, I just don't believe he is international quality, and he is a bit of a penalty magnet as well.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
06 Nov 2014, 12:24
#3
06 Nov 2014, 12:24#3
Meyer should have gone with Redlinghuys as the tighthead reserve. In fact I would have liked to see him start!Locks should have been Etzebeth and Willemse and 7 should be Schalk. Now we have a much better pack.
BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
06 Nov 2014, 22:30
#4
06 Nov 2014, 22:30#4
 Dr Moz you need some help with the props story so hope you read th e above.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news