FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Meyer's 42 - How they did this weekend

Meyer's 42 - How they did this weekend

Started by clevermike1 REPLIES245 VIEWS· 27 May 2012, 05:31
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
27 May 2012, 05:31
#1
27 May 2012, 05:31#1

Of his list of 42 - a third of them Bulls - there were some real clangers this weekend.  Kirchner was poor undr the high ball and worse in defence.    Basson was fine - but meisiejind was useless.   Steyn had a fine kicking game - but a very poor flyhalf game.   Hougaard was really poor this game around - but the loose forwards supposed to protect him were worse.    Spies remains a show pony - end of story.    The Bulls tight forwards were disastrous.    The roll;ing mauls became a set of plays where the Bulls got penalized,  lost possession of knock on balls.   of the 14 Bulls I would say only 1 was really good - the rest was average.

Now for the Lions - they were disastrous all year long and this weekend was no different.    There is no players in that crowd that is of any use and even their best player - Taute was injured early.   That takes care of five of Meyer's 42.

The Cheetahs - played well, but Oosthuizen - their best chance for selection did not do well in scrummaging.      However he did well in the rest of this play and he and Strauss generally had a very good game.   Brussouw for the first time this year showed some improvement .   At leat three of the players in meyer's group did well.

The Sharks - Lambie was good - but the man who made the game was Michalak.    Jordaan remains to my mind a contender for higher honours - especially since the remaining contenders are not really that sttrong.    Alberts played a better game than expected - but butter-fingers let him down - too many handling errors.   Coetzee was top class.   The Sharks front row did not really convince  - but they were better than expected against the youngsters.    Five good playerscould make it into the Springbok team.

The Stormers - lets start with the players included.    Habana was average - Aplon was very - very good.   De Villiers was on the whole average - he made mistakes - but also tried to initiate good plays.    Grant was good in all aspects of the game.   Etzebeth was good and Bekker average.   Of the players not invited - Elstadt competed with Alberts in teh butter-fingers competition and Malherbe disappointed.

I think that Meyer has a problem and he is forced into picking players who are under-performing.   That is not a good start as a coach of SA. 

 

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
27 May 2012, 06:14
#2
27 May 2012, 06:14#2

...."but meisiekind was useless."

I've never known him to be any different...

 

"Spies remains a show pony - end of story."

Disagree....more like a Greek Statue but with fewer moves...

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news