Mole Hunt

So i been sccused of being buggered (what the hell name is that), tzu and so other thing. heres my ip, if you get a match with another then fine call me what you want.

208.123.223.217

hope that clears this thing up.

 Sure, if you say so.

 well thats the way it is, if you dont like then then tough shazzam. no proof then shut the gab hole. i bet you are probably buggered, you sound like a guy who would pick that kindda name. or maybe your beenbag in disguise. yeah it works both ways buddy.

 You couldn't be anymore stupid. Stop trying to lie to everyone here, we all know that your previous aliases were Sun-Tzu, Aristocrat and Allucard.

 proof proof proof. provide it sunny boy jim lad .

 
Well ... you have the same stupid way about you.

That's proof enough for me thanks, Buggerer!

 I think CleanGene and Saggex are the same posters, they definitely are just as aggressive and arrogant. very similar.

 Yep Gonzo the liar is most likely Sun-Tzu/Aristocrat or Spoony. Same flawed opinions.

 Now Spoony? where do you klowns come up with this total tom kakkery? but a good laugh anyways.

 You have the exact same views on players and you've referred to past threads that were created before you joined as Bozo but were there when you posted as Sun-Tzu. Plus there's a similarity between 'Sun-Tzu' and 'Bonzo the Great'.

 Have I now? list these same players. And what threads? I dont remember referring to any old threads except the link ceradyne posted to mike. man cheezer, you are lost in the woods.

 Lambie, Goosen, Etzebeth, Bismarck and Serfontein. You've referred to the threads that you created under Sun-Tzu attempting to slate Goosen. You don't have any dignity do you Bozo? Man up. 

 I dont have to justifdy myself cheezer. i dont know who posted that thread, but if it was tzu then what does that prove? ceradyne posted the link, I read it and referred to your post in it. Does that mean ceradyne could be tzu? he found it afterall, i never knew it existed. you are over reaching badly my friend. and prove that i list exactly the same players. Heres the players I dont rate:

Alberts, Lambie, Goosen, Pienaar, Jean, JJ, Pietersen, Eben, Serfontein, Gurthro, Kirchner, Jordaan, Spies, Kolisi, Coenie, Coetzee... I dont like Louw or Schalk but gave them credit for what they do bring.

Most players on that list are not liked, so what point you making? not much in my opinion.common thought all the way through except vfor a couple.

There Cheezer, I layed it all out for you, now go find the prove and check them off one by one. If you cant then you are a sniveling little liar.

You and Sun-Tzu have the exact same opinion on players, you're not convincing anyone idiot only assuring that your Sun-Tzu etc. I don't lie, I leave that to you. 
Also you've tried to aim threads at certain posters and have the same confrontational feel as both Sun-Tzu and Bozo.  

 prove it buddy. i dont think you are right so i challenge you. you sound as extreme as mikey., even as desperate.

 

 Man, I look flippin beautiful. the sophistication, the mystique of a powerful and deep manly figure. thanks for the photo sebastian. if you want, I can sign it for you

Hmmm . . . Gonzo the Gimp lists Zane Kirchner as a player he doesn't rate while Dim Sum was a big fan of Zane Kirchner and even went as far as saying he'd pick Zane Kirchner ahead of Israel Folau.

(Note that Dim Sum thought Israel Folau was a slow, weak and useless plodder . . . which gives you some kind of idea just what a rugby noob he really was.)

Having said that, Gonzo the Gimp has said some unbelievably stupid things as well and we have to consider the possibility that he may have changed identity from Dim Sum to Gonzo the Gimp after Israel Folau scored try after try in this year's S15 and the dullard realized just how much egg he was going to get all over his stupid face.

They do have a lot of similar likes and dislikes when it comes to players and note that they both hate Patrick Lambie with a passion bordering on the sociopathic . . . probably after his/their wif . . . I mean, his/their "life partner" . . . said words to the effect that they are physically attracted to Pat Lambie and the poor dear/s nearly had a jealous meltdown and hasn't been able to get it up ever since.

I'm certainly not discounting the possibility that Gonzo the Gimp is the same feeble-minded and attention-seeking dolt who used to post as Dim Sum and Alucard. As I've said before, he sure sounds dumb enough!

 Dumb? I make perfect sense Rooigaat. And no hatred of lambie whatsoever, that you imagined. So the witch hunt loses it credibility and spirals down the drain, too bad.

 Chezza, agree with you. Same pet hates, same likes, except that he has now thrown in Kirschner as a "don't" rate to confuse the issue. There are just too many similarities for it to be coincidental. Sun Tzu also denied being Alucard and Aristocrat and the later accepted it as being correct. Card, you've got a very good rugby brain, but you do have a couple of blind spots that makes you easy to spot. Put that together with your'e use of the English Language and there can be no doubt. Give us your take on De Jongh and Aplon please.This is no attack on you and if you choose rather to be known as Gonzo, that's fine by me.

 you are wrong to a t Db, i seen nothing like evidence to me just hiffing and puffing its just all too weak. sorry, but the witch hunt ends in failure. so much for knowing for fact i was all these other bozos

 I see you don't deny it either. You supplied an IP addresses and said it won't match the other names, you asked for proof, but you know we can't supply any hard evidence.  This is the internet, only site admin can check up on IP addies. This is not a which hunt like you say, just a couple of other posters calling your bluff. 
PS, on this whole thread, you did not onc e deny being Alucard/Aristocrat/Sun Tzu,  you just asked us to prove it. So I ask you now, do you deny posting under those aliasses as well?

 I denied it already, but believe all you want no fur off my blue back. No surprises its the same mouthy stupids who bleat nonsense that are coming up with this shit, never shy to be  wrong on everything.

 I have admitted to being wrong a few times. I'm quite sure that I'm not wrong about this. You will give yourself away eventually and Gonzo will be gone and replaced by someone new. I'll leave it at that for the time being.

 Man lets hope we never lose gonz ou the grunt. That avatar just cracks me up! HahahahahahahahaNice to see some good mole hunting going on. I see JW is sleeping on the job. His days as an apprentice mole hunter looking perilous ! 

 OK, from the posters on here that knows Card from way back:
1. Moz2. Beeno3. Saffex4. Denny5. Vlag6. Bob
How many of you think that Bonzo is not Card and who think it most probably is him?

 Gonz ou has just posted this -  like jean going to munster that was a big failure!Its a favourite comment by Card. Card strangely never rated Jean. Case closed time to come clean Gonz ou!!!
Again Ia sk where was JW who has been blowing his mole trumpet for the last two weeks. It's the old hands who again solve the case. 

 Thanks Beenz, but that was only one of the many tells. Our Card would not make a good poker player, but lets not get too much ahead, lets hear out the others first.

So, why the curiosity about the bloke's identity? Nobody has tried arguing the points that he is making. Why not try that first, or is that where the real problem lies?

 That's not on topic Vlag. Like I said a bit higher up in the thread, he's got a good rugby brain with a few blind spots. Why are you confusing the issue of this thread?  From my side, I would like Card posting here under any name he chooses, but why lie about it? Only he will know why.Your answer please Vlag.

 What does it matter? Not too long ago, someone else pissed off from here. Now whether or not the guy was who he said he was, is irrelevant. He also had loads of valid arguments. He was not your typical troll. Just as this Gonzo guy, or who ever. The only ones who are seriously concerned about his identity are the ones who don'y like what he says and (mostly) do not have real counter arguments.

If he is indeed Alucard, so what? He had very good and substantial arguments on SS as well. He was not very popular because of his views of Lambie and a few people kakked themselves about him daring to say anything negative about Lambie dearest. In hindsight, one has to wonder whether he was that far off the mark?

So, what is the use of this argument, in any case? Is he the only one with more than one alias? Who knows?

Beeno: I leave you in charge for a day & look what happens GoG has run amok !!
Glad to see DB and others stepped up big time. How to repair the damage done to the reputation of mole hunting on this site? That is the question (rhetorical)

 Jw at last arrives on the case which has been solved in his absence. BwahahahahhaWindpomp but we are just telling Card we are onto him.
Card has definte likes and dislikes re players. Some of them are odd like Jean. It was a relatively easy case but it is noteworthy that ou JW was all at sea!

Thans vlag...for agreeing without actually saying so. My question though, why lie about it?  What does that say about one's integrity? I like the points that he raises and the way he presents his argument. It sparks debate and conversation, but why all the bullshit along with it?

Beeno: if it makes you more able to handle to fact that your mates had to cover for you that's fine with me the loss of the shine on your mole hunter reputation is enough punishment IMO.
GoG has not done any harm as far as I can see so he qualifies as a Multi but it is not clear yet that he is a malicious mole. 
As a relatively harmless multi he falls down the list of priorities, i.e. we are not "pursuit & punish" mode. DB & others have things well in hand so no need to incur the fees of my company. 

 Well there are lots of other lies around here. Want me to name a few? There are also a few others with more than one alias, that hasn't been picked up. Fact still remains...... so what? There are people around here who spread malicious lies about players but that seem to be OK, yet there is this moerse noise about ou Gonzo. One of the biggest hypocrites kept an alias like that going for ages and now he is so high and mighty...... on this very same thread nogal.

 Agreed JW, definitely no malicious mole our Bonzo and Beenz will agree that Card/Bonzo is a quality poster! He also need a bit of guidance,  but he is closer to being educated than your average Kiwi, so let's not waste any more time on this ;-)

 Cera, who are the other multies? Please tell. At least Card uses one ID at a time. I never said it was a crime against humanity, but it wasn't me that started this thread now, was it?

 Agree JW Gonzo is a multi and windpomp is a dunce - the poor oak is getting very serious about this! Hahahhahaha

Nope, Draad . Not saying a word. LOL. I agree that all this mole hunting is a waste of time and a bit of a joke. I would much rather see a few of these bozo's trying to debate his arguments. And I am not talking about something like: "Anybody who rates this, that and the other, is a fucking stupid prick, etc". That is not debate.