Mike says you are taller than 178 cms, which he claims he is....but older chaps shrink a bit. So I'd say taller than 176 cms is probably more accurate. You yourself claimed you were 6 feet, which was a total lie....and then you told us you were 180 cms, which is under 5' 11". I would say 5' 10" is probably about right.
But the simple truth is Dave isn't 6 feet, nor 5' 11".
I was 5' 11.5 " inches when I was in the Navy and 175 lbs. Ironically I'm still 175 lbs, maintained with some care through many executive dinners and glasses of Claret, but the long term effects of gravity on the human frame, have pulled me down to a max of 5' 11". I may be less, I'm not denying the facts as they may exist.
I found myself comfortably taller than him.
To me six footish is somewhere between 5 11.5 " and 6" O.5 ". it's not 5' 10".
Your problem Dave is I am 180cms, it says so on several official documents and in my medical records.
So that would make you 179 cms to my 180 cms. I think it was at least an inch, but lets accept your number for argument sake. So that makes you 5' 10.5.
Well I would put him at 5' 10" and 220lbs.
He wore the biggest jacket they could find in my London Club.
Fat is relative to how short you are....but 5' 10" and 220lbs is obese.
Well at 5 11" I looked down on you from a dizzy height.
Come now Dave.....stop lying old chap, it's silly. You are nowhere near 6 feet.
We should believe the chap that's 5' 11" and looked down on you.....that's the only person who can set an upper bound. Certainly not the 5' 3" Pom lass or Mike who thinks he is still 5' 10".
I like to think I can tell when someone is taking the piss and normally I'd assume that anyone who is obsessive or childish enough to make all the comments above would be taking the piss . . . but with Moffie I'm not so sure.
Is it possible that he is actually sad, lifeless and juvenile enough to be serious when he carries on day after day about the 0.5 cm difference in height between him and Saffex? Anyone else think he's not even joking about this?