He was also hammered back in another case and there was another turnover later in the game,
Did you notice the they did when intending to get a driving maul going. Du Toit moved to the front of the line-out and Etzebeth moved to the middle of the line-out, with Mostert somewhere at the back of the lineout, Clear that he cannot be involved in driving mauls -to weak for that,
Maaik, BS, Mosterdt is solid enough.
Mostert had the most carries, one of his best tests.
Mostert had the most carries, one of his best tests.
Where Du Toit is ten times the player Mostert will ever be, LMAO
Where Du Toit is ten times the player Mostert will ever be, LMAO
Steph is quality and so is Mostert.
No Mozart
Du Toit is physically stronger in all respects - better quality tackles - better carrying balls in traffic and also better in open play - more effective in following up kicks and generally more effective in ball protection and recovery and passing of the ball - the complete silence on his try assist is typical of you.
Du Toit moved to the front of the line-out and Etzebeth moved to the
middle of the line-out, with Mostert somewhere at the back of the
lineout, Clear that he cannot be involved in driving mauls -to weak
for that,
He was middle of the lineout and driving right at the front next to catcher Etzebeth for our first maul try.
Where should he be Pakie? he is supposed to be in the front part of a maul. Now give me a real reason why in line-outs from where driving mauls is expected -
* they moved Du Toit to the front of the line-out;
* they moved Etzebeth to the middle of the line-out; and
* they moved Mostert to the back of the line-out to the position normally occupied by the 7
Driving mauls are basically only effective when the Jumper take the ball and organized and control the maul movements. Mostert is totally incapable of doing that and is effectively cut out from the major component. of the maul.
Du Toit is moved to the front of the line-out to cater for another option breaking out in the front part of the lineout -which cannot be handled by Mostert either.
.
Duplication
.
Now give me a real reason why in line-outs from where driving mauls is expected
In that lineout we were clearly planning to maul it over. Mostert is middle of the lineout, Steph at the back. Successful maul, no problem. Why would we score a maul try with Mostert front and center in the maul supporting the catcher , and then decide to move him to the back because he "can't maul". Stop talking shit.
No Pakie - it happened in virtually all the line-outs as I described. So answer why it happened. that Etzebeth moved to the middle of the line-out and Du Toi to the front? Why was no ball thrown to Mostert to initiate a driving maul?
Wait a bit further also - what happened when De Allende break through and ended up being tackled by three players ending up a meter out, The ball came back to Mostert and he was tackled back. The Springboks were lucky - the ball came back to them again and and Pollard scored,
A similar situation can be found in the De Jager try in the Aussie test. De Jager carried the ball forward and scored the try - Mostert was tackled back in the same circumstances and he attack nearly fizzled out. Can you now understand why Mostert is to weak to be a top class lock?
.
