Mozart ad his assessent of sprtsmen

A year ago Mozart's one main objective was to besmirch Quinton de Kock and said how good Smith was and how poor De Kock was,  he other famous quote from the dolt was that De Kock will always fail against the Aussie bowlers and that he will not make a century against the Aussies - even though when he made that remark De Kock already scored a century against the Aussies.    
Like per normal De Kock proved him wrong.   He made 178 and past Gibbs 175 against Australia.  He took less balls than Gibbs took in his innings.
 So what does that mean?   It shows that like in other sports - especially rugby - Mozart knows nothing about team sports.          

Never said that Tokkie.....produce where I said de Kock would never make a century against Australia. Do that and I'll send you a banana. But this Is what your good friend Rooibandy said about him:
 
Status: Senior player 
Posts: 3121RE: Quinton fails again...SA/Ire match
March 12, 2015, 10:33:56

Enough is enough. Either give AB the gloves and drop QdK or else at least bat this failure at 8 or 9! Dale Steyn looks more likely to score runs than Q

 I do not check back on threads - but clearly remember your rants about De Kock in the past.   You found one by Rooinek - but conveniently enough never found those attaks by you. 
Incidentally yesterday was De Kock's 11th ODI century.   In his whole ODI career your hero Graeme Smith made 13.  Smith's highest score in ODI's was 140 runs and De Kock's one yesterday past that one with ease.  
Well - one still has to wonder about your deficient prejudiced base comments on sportsmen.      

 You clearly remember....hahaha. I didn't think De Kock was an opening batsmen, but I never said he would never score a century against Oz.....that would be another flight of Tokkie fantasy.
Stop lying you creepy old Coot.

 No look up your denigrating threads on De Kock and you will find your statement there.  

 No look up your denigrating threads on De Kock and you will find your statement there.  

 Let me explain something to you plank. You are making the assertion. Find the proof or perhaps your toy boy Rooibandy will help you. Either way I want a cut and paste or just zip it.

Hmmm . . . let's see when I posted that . . . oh, it was March 2015 . . . so during the CWC!
Well Dumbo, QdK was rubbish during that tournament and during the first half of 2015. His scores between January and July 2015 were as follows: 4, 7, 7, 12, 1, 0, 26, 78*, 14, 35, 2 and 7. 
If you disagree with the statement of mine that you quoted then you know about as much about cricket as Dense. What a moron!
All credit to Quinton de Kock for getting over that rough patch and finally fulfilling his talent which was glaringly obvious to everyone in the world except you!
LMAO! 

 Rooinek
How many times did Mozart denigrated De Kock and said he should never have replaced Graeme Smith.  My allegation that he said he cannot bat against decent bowling and made his centuries against weak bowling attacks is correct.  That is when he said that he would never be successful against Australia.  
The fool is a liar of repute - he knows what he wrote about De Kock in the past and that is where the dud made a fool of himself.
I also was disappointed with De Kock in the WC.  He was injured in December 2014 and was called back to play with no match involvement for more than two months.   I think that contributed to his poor form in the WC.   Perhaps he was rushed back - something that should not have happened.  

Ou Maaik, I think a lot of us were very frustrated with QdK because we knew how much talent he had and he wasn't producing . . . a bit like Jacques Kallis in his first few test matches . . . but I think Mofie is the only one who didn't recognise QdK's obvious talent at all.
A bit like his failure to spot Pieter-Steph du Toit's obvious class.

Well done Quinton...vindicated yourself and put your upstart critics in their place...just as well that and that you weren't named Isak...lolz

 hahahahaha ou rooitwit caught out again. "  Either give AB the gloves and drop QdK or else at least bat this failure at 8 or 9"! 
Fancy assessing De Kock as a failure just because of a lean patch. ou rooitwit has always struggled trying to understand cricket. 

 Good knock by Quinny.

 Rooinek
They were too young to be acceptable to Mozart - if they were 30 or so they would be regarded as top class. 

 This is  soooooo funny I can hardly get up off the floor to push submit.....Rooibanby says my outing of him was in 2015, that he saw de Kock's talent  but was frustrated by his non performance. Here is a totally devastating post from 2016 that blows up all those lies.
LMAOFY&Y ......bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahaha!


 
Status: Senior player 
Posts: 3121RE: So Clean Cut.....
January 13, 2016, 15:31:13

Can't agree Plum. I'm not seeing any of this talent you're talking about and the very idea of plodders or non-performers like Faf du Plessis, Stiaan van Zyl, Quinton de Kock, JP Duminy and Kyle Abbott competing for places ...

 This is  soooooo funny I can hardly get up off the floor to push submit.....Rooiband y says my outing of him was in 2015, that he saw de Kock's talent  but was frustrated by his non performance. Here is a totally devastating post from 2016 that blows up all those lies.
LMAOFY&Y......bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahaha!


 
Status: Senior player 
Posts: 3121RE: So Clean Cut.....
January 13, 2016, 15:31:13

Can't agree Plum. I'm not seeing any of this talent you're talking about and the very idea of plodders or non-performers like Faf du Plessis, Stiaan van Zyl, Quinton de Kock, JP Duminy and Kyle Abbott competing for places ...