Mozart and age

Moz, you and I got into a spat a little while ago because I accused you of being obsessed with age. After that spat I was going to leave the whole topic alone, but now you have once again started a thread on the topic. The thing is, if you type the words "year old" in the forum search tab and press enter, then my assertion is proven to be 100% correct. I think you owe me an apology this time, because on those two key words alone, you have started 10 threads based on the age of an athlete. It is also entirely possible that you started even more threads on the topic without using those two words, but that is irrelevant, 10 threads paints a pretty clear picture.   

 
Mutton dressed as Lamb.

He has a very large chip on his shoulder. Growing old is something he hasn't managed to deal with yet.

The good looking guy he used to be is no longer that person looking back at him in the mirror. Now he sees the rot.

It's scary stuff.

 Athletes/ Sportsmen are perfor ming better for longer is the point Dr Moz is correctly making. Of course age catches up in the end and has the final say.

An apology? From Moffie?

LMAO!

I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you, bluebok.

What's far more likely is for Moffie to get all incensed that you're asking for an apology and demand an apology from you . . . to be followed by the Servile Gimps all snapping and snarling at you demanding that you apologise immediately to Moffie for having the temerity to ask for an apology!

That's how things work around here.

As for the age thing, I would have thought you'd been around here long enough to know how that all started but I'll refresh your memory anyway.

When Moffie's hero Victor Matfield made his ill-fated decision to return to rugby aged 37, Moffie refused to accept that he was now slow and useless and he went off on this hilarious crusade to prove that older athletes and sportsmen in their late 30s are actually better than younger guys in their 20s.

Of course, in his deceitful and manipulative style, Moffie is very selective in the examples he uses . . . which is why he blurts his ignorance all over the board whenever an old toppie like Roger Federer or Justin Gatlin wins something but he shuts up when it's relative youngsters like Jordan Spieth winning golf majors, Luvo Manyonga winning gold in the long-jump, Beauden Barrett being named rugby player of the year or Wade van Niekerk breaking the 400m world record.

I wouldn't worry too much about the whole age obsession . Just have a laugh at the ignorant old fool who is so pompous and self-important that he genuinely believes he never gets anything wrong . . . even when his fat face is dripping with egg . . . which is most of the time! 

Bloo I have posted almost 21000 times, of which you say you find 8 topics I have started about age. That means statistically more than 2500 posts have to occur before I will post another one....is that very inconvenient for you? .... HasBeen states the point perfectly and of course the topic is relevant...find somebody else to bug will you. For example how many posts has Urinal made depicting Sodomy?

bluebok, perhaps yo u should apologise?

LMAO!

Moz, don't play stupid. You are a smart guy. Your stat would only make sense if you had started 21000 threads. There is a big difference between 21000 posts and starting 21000 threads. Also, I have used a couple of different key words and discovered you have started many other threads about athletes ages. 
Look, I am not going to argue with you about it, you have started in the region of 20 threads on the same topic. The facts are the facts. You can try and twist it around by creating confusion around things like posts vs threads, or you can just admit you have started threads on the same thing repeatedly and we can just forget about it. 
To be honest I don't care. I just find it very odd that you deny it, but continue to it. 

Someone owes someone an apology here. 

Okay so let's say I have started 2000 threads, and let's say 20 of them are about the age factor in sport. That means 100 of my threads have to go by before you see another one. There are 15 of my threads on the Board out of 70, so the Forum will have to turn over more than 6 times before you see the next. Is that too inconvenient for you?

Or put another way....this appears to be Board thread 23582, and you are complaining about 20 threads started on age in sports. Petty very petty!

Moffie trying hard to pretend he hasn't been fixated by age ever since Victor Matfield returned to rugby as an old, useless has-been.

I wonder if anyone is buying his sputtering denials ? Anyone other than the Servile Gimps of course!

A few Google tricks using search operators.
https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/2466433?hl=en

If you type the search operator site: into Google, it gives a list of all pages from the ruckers forum that are indexed in Google.
site:ruckersforum.com

Search for a specific site-

site:" in front of a domain. For example, 
site:youtube.com 
site:ruckersforum.com


Then combine site:ruckersforum.com "mozart" "age"eg. (copy and paste next line into Google)- 
site:ruckersforum.com "mozart" "age"

The " " signs are exact match searches. This means these specific words have to be included in the search term results page (SERP) listings.
This is a way to filter down specifically on Mozart and age- for one website domain. Many or most of the references seem to be from Clevermike......- speaking about Mozart and age.