FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Mozart this is a special extract for you

Mozart this is a special extract for you

Started by clevermike9 REPLIES262 VIEWS· 12 May 2014, 19:03
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 May 2014, 19:03
#1
12 May 2014, 19:03#1

From the Sharksworld Player Ratings for the Brumbies game:-


10. Francois Steyn. As good as the one halfback was, the other was equally poor. Steyn has always worn the flyhalf role like a particularly ill-fitting suit and on Saturday, his accuracy in execution was just not there – to the Sharks’ detriment. I hope we never go into another key game without a back-up plan at flyhalf. 4/10


Steyn's deficiencies impacted on the ratings of all the players outside of him as well - so I will add that for you too:-


12. Paul Jordaan. Was hardly used all game long – a real waste. 5/

13. S’bura Sithole. Just like Jordaan, the combination of a kick-based game plan and an off radar for the flyhalf resulted in very little for him to do on attack. Having a player like this on the field, yet not finding ways to get him the ball, is just criminal. 5/10 


Now that is strong language coming from the Sharks supporters website.   I like the terminology describing Francois Steyn's flyhalf performances - he is ill-fitting in that position and in the opinion of many people should never play there again.  


He completely neutralized the Sharks backline all on his own - but has he not done that when he was playing at center as well?   Just check the stats and you would find he was a constant in that respect this year. 


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
12 May 2014, 21:40
#2
12 May 2014, 21:40#2

Enjoyable fiction. A sort of Game of Thrones in which Fransie is cast as the dwarf. This moron is undoubtedly deeply invested in the idea that Lambie could beat the All Blacks. Trust me he can't....a small, slow player with no particular step and wavering self belief is not going to do the job. I admire what he has accomplished with limited physical assets, but let's not go there.

 

But more than that the "writer" even has his facts wrong. Poor Jordaan (another small chap ill suited to real rugby) and Sithole were starved. But surprise Jordaan got the ball 8 times....same as Leali'ifano. And Sithole got the ball 5 times , 3 times more Kuridrani. Admittedly they probably didn't want to  pass to Kuridrani because he was still dizzy after trying a crash tackle on Fransie and having to be checked for concussion.

 

So what gives? It was a wet night and both teams decided to kick for territory. Fransie put in some good kicks a few poor ones and he was bad on penalties and kickoffs. His general game running, passing and tackling was excellent.

 

I hope this has been an education for you OOM. And I must say even though this fellow is clearly one of the anti Fransie types that linger in Durban at least one could follow the language. My advice to you would be to continue to paste other views but find a few from guys who have more sense.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 May 2014, 22:10
#3
12 May 2014, 22:10#3
Mozart
You are indeed a bloody idiot to support the useless Steyn as potential flyhalf for the Springboks.  That story about his running, passing and defense being excellent - is utter bullshit.   Unlike the previous matches where he missed a number of tackles he did not miss one on Saturday - an improvement taking him from below par to par. Then the fib about his passing game - what positive results did his passing game produced?  Zero - he only passed the ball 8 times and 5 of those were hospital passes - producing nothing positive for the team.  
The size of Jordaan had bugger all to do with the poor backline performance - the saboteur of the backline was Steyn - nobody else.   
And your remark about the author being one of the anti-Fransie types is utter  bullshit.  That guy has defended Steyn from attack many times and he is really not anti any Sharks player.  However, he looks at games objectively and came to the realistic conclusion that Steyn flopped at flyhalf.
Are you happy to be proven a complete idiot?             
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
12 May 2014, 22:37
#4
12 May 2014, 22:37#4

Nonsense OOM. This fool and his acolytes like your good self represent the kind of limited thinking that deprived us of the most physically talented flyhalf in world rugby. If you could specify a modern flyhalf Fransie would emerge out of the jar.

 

Then because he was a bit selfish as a youngster everybody tried to convince him  he's not a flyhalf.

 

He needs time on the job, like every other player.....he needs help from top notch coaches, much time has been  wasted. But there is your RWC flyhalf.

 

 

And incidentally forget about the small chaps like Lambie and Jordaan....there is no joy there.  

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 May 2014, 22:56
#5
12 May 2014, 22:56#5
 Mozart
Steyn is 27 years of age and has been playing provincial and international rugby for 7 years.   If he does not know how to read games at flyhalf or how to pass balls by now - no amount of coaching would help him.  
He did not pass balls properly on Saturday at flyhalf or in any game he played at flyhalf - he did not pass it at center throughout the series  as well.   He is clueless when to kick balls and when to pass and that no coach will get right either.  He is the second worse tackler in both flyhalf and center positions in any SA franchise - he was just past by De Jongh this weekend.   In his games at flyhalf his tackles stats were 25% missed tackle ratio - he did not miss any tackles on Saturday - but that was really an exception.
His pace is slow and not acceptable and his play is killing the whole backline - whomsoever play outside of him cannot produce the goods - since they do not get any balls to carry. 
Let me put it bluntly - no amount off verbal diarrhea by you will obliterate the fat that Steyn is a shit and clueless flyhalf.  World rugby will laugh at us if we select that clueless player as our flyhalf.      


MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
12 May 2014, 23:09
#6
12 May 2014, 23:09#6
But look at the two alternatives you believe will lead us to RWC glory....Lambie and Goosen. Those two chappies will fold like a deck of cards in the heat of battle. The fact that you can't see that stems from the same source as your inability to see Steyn could be a better Butch James.....a very limited imagination and painfully low IQ.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
12 May 2014, 23:18
#7
12 May 2014, 23:18#7
Mozart 
What makes you think that Lambie and Goosen will fold like a deck of cards when Steyn would not know what do with the deck of cards?
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
12 May 2014, 23:55
#8
12 May 2014, 23:55#8
Oom I'd try to explain, but sadly one has to conclude there are concepts that simply elude you. Not to say you can't enjoy your rugby at a kinda basic level.  
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
13 May 2014, 00:26
#9
13 May 2014, 00:26#9
 Mozart
Try to explain a theory that has never worked this season - so what merit is there in that theory?
I can see what is wrong in the Sharks backline - the malfunctioning thereof and their inability to score tries.  So can everyone else but you - the amswer is tied up in one player - Francois Steyn.  It happens whether he plays at 10 or 12.
Size alone without competence is meaningless in rugby and in the case of Steyn speed and competence has gone out of the window.   He is playing on reputation and he is achieving zero - but for kicking at goal - where in the last game he went the Morne Steyn 2012 way.
Sorry Mozart - an explanation would just prove how theoretical your opinion is.  If you can explain away the lack of ball sense and reading of the game ability of Francois by providing factual examples - then a person can look at that, but am afraid you would not be able to provide any examples of that over the past two years.

    
       .  
3K
3ku1Pro2,580 posts
13 May 2014, 17:57
#10
13 May 2014, 17:57#10
 Wheres my popcorn
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news