Captain30,741 posts
25 Mar 2019, 13:50
#1
25 Mar 2019, 13:50#1
15. Green
14. Nkosi
13. Kriel
12. Esterhuizen
11. Mapimpi
10. Jantjies
9. Schreuder
1. Kitshoff
2. Aker
3. Sadie
4. Herbst
5. PSDT
6. Kolisi
7. Lewies
8. du Preez
My team of the week
Started by Saffolk 13 REPLIES449 VIEWS· 25 Mar 2019, 13:50
Captain18,117 posts
25 Mar 2019, 14:24
#2
25 Mar 2019, 14:24#2
Akker had a good game but Marx scored 2 tries and won countless turnovers so I'd give him the hooker spot this week.
Can't argue with most of the others.
Can't argue with most of the others.
Coach57,555 posts
25 Mar 2019, 14:46
#3
25 Mar 2019, 14:46#3
Dave
Sorry I disagree totally with you. here - for one Du Toit played at 7? Why pick him at 5. Not necessary because Schickerling played at 5 and he had a good game. I also think Marx had a much better game at 2 ahead of Akker,
Estrhuizen and Am was a joke as a center pair, And Jantjies was his normal useless self as per normal.
Captain30,741 posts
25 Mar 2019, 15:00
#4
25 Mar 2019, 15:00#4
Yeah Rooi close call between Aker and Marx, I gave it to Aker as he carried the ball more.
Mike stop speaking your usual crap. PSDT played most of the second half at 5
Esterhuizen was by far the best 12 and Am was the best 13 on the day
Jantjies was far better than Pollard and du Plessis and marginally better than du Preez
I’m not interested in your pathetic prejudicial takes.
I’m not interested in some twits comments who will never acknowledge the merits of a player. So regardless of how well Jantjies or Esterhuizen ever play you will never select them because of your childish prejudices.
My team of the weak has nothing to do with my personal preferences - I am mature enough to look past that
Coach57,555 posts
25 Mar 2019, 15:18
#5
25 Mar 2019, 15:18#5
Unfortunately I did not see the full Sharks game. I saw Esterhuizen handling the ball twice near the tryline, the one ball came back the second one was a turnover,
Because of that I looked at the stats and was not impressed either, Niothing indicated that either Esterhuizen or Am had a good game/ That is why I did not wrote about an SA team of the week. The games were more characterized by poor performances by a number of players in the same position as was the case in the past few weeks.
Captain30,741 posts
25 Mar 2019, 16:29
#6
25 Mar 2019, 16:29#6
So you are stupid enough to base your calls having not even watched the games - that is beyond pathetic
Coach57,555 posts
25 Mar 2019, 16:47
#7
25 Mar 2019, 16:47#7
No Saffex
I watched all previous games, And as stated I watched the first half of the Sharks game and saw that Am looked like a lost sheep and Esterhuizen made a few carries with no impact whatsoever on the game. Fact is he lost ball possession when the Sharks could have scored.
As to the Lions game I watched the full game and I am afraid I saw nothing special about Jantjies. I remember your slection of him last week when he made mistakes galore and a knock on a few meters out - resulting in a Reels try - after he through a pass to nobody earlier in the game leading to another try was all I needed to see to say you were dead wrong last week. Fact is this week he was replaced after fouling up and his benching caused the Lions backline to perform better than they did with him on the field.
I now you cannot see anything wrong with the Jantjies performances - but I do because I am objective.
.
sharkbok
Captain23,251 posts
Captain23,251 posts
25 Mar 2019, 16:57
#8
25 Mar 2019, 16:57#8
The Lions have made the last 3 Super Rugby finals, and if Jantjies was useless that would not have happened. He was one of their key players over the last 3 seasons.
Captain30,741 posts
25 Mar 2019, 17:08
#9
25 Mar 2019, 17:08#9
Mike is so fucking stupid that he thinks because Jantjies threw a flat pass that got intercepted somehow he is useless. He ignores the fact that intercepts are part of the game and he ignores the fact that Jantjies set up two tries in that same game.
So clever Mike are you saying that one of Pollard, du Plessis or du Preez were better than Jantjies this weekend huh?
Captain17,321 posts
25 Mar 2019, 17:14
#10
25 Mar 2019, 17:14#10
Fact is he lost ball possession when the Sharks could have scored.
Strangely he has no turnovers conceded against his name in the stats, and you clearly missed his carry straight over a defender to cross the advantage line in order to set up Du Preez's try.
Coach57,555 posts
25 Mar 2019, 17:48
#11
25 Mar 2019, 17:48#11
There was a turnover made in the case of the game as mentioned - it does not necessarily mean he gave away a turnover - it could also be a penalty - which he did give away.
Coach57,555 posts
25 Mar 2019, 17:48
#12
25 Mar 2019, 17:48#12
There was a turnover made in the case of the game as mentioned - it does not necessarily mean he gave away a turnover - it could also be a penalty - which he did give away.
Captain17,321 posts
25 Mar 2019, 17:55
#13
25 Mar 2019, 17:55#13
Could be that.
Captain30,741 posts
26 Mar 2019, 16:16
#14
26 Mar 2019, 16:16#14
Revised my side Kriel ahead of Am. He was the only Bull to pull his weight
— END OF THREAD —
