n
dribs and drabs the Springboks file out for training. Jesse Kriel is
first, Faf de Klerk one of the last and Willie le Roux, in a tracksuit
and visor combo only someone playing with his current swagger could pull
off, somewhere in between.
Soon the
serious stuff begins and support staff can be heard asking where he is.
Roughly a minute before the cameras have to be packed away he strides
out, whips off his jacket, takes a tackle shield from Siya Kolisi and
gets straight into the action. Welcome to the Rassie Erasmus Show.
England leave out Willis and have doubt over Mako Vunipola for South Africa
Read more
Say
what you will about Erasmus but you can not question his sense of
theatre. There is little doubt this appearance was choreographed. He was
banned from matchday activities for
the win against Italy last week and will be for the game at Twickenham
on Saturday but during the week it is business as usual for the
Springboks’ director of rugby.
A
couple of hours earlier, the head coach, Jacques Nienaber, named a
squad featuring eight changes before taking questions, ostensibly about
his selection but aware enough to know he would be asked about Erasmus.
He takes a few questions until he is asked if he supports Erasmus
putting videos on social media. The intervention is swift, Nienaber is
instructed not to answer and the rest of us told this is not a Rassie
press conference.
This is how Springboks deal with the social media outbursts that have led to Erasmus’s two?match ban, coming soon after a 12-month ban for similar behaviour.
The trouble is, without properly addressing the issue there is no
contrition, not even a hint of acknowledgment of any wrongdoing. Into
the vacuum comes the implication that the rest of the Springboks setup
agrees with Erasmus. That his actions are endorsed. Equally, the
suspicion there is no one within the union with nearly the sufficient
power to control him.
Rassie Erasmus suspended by World Rugby again over social media rants
Read more
Indeed,
with even the briefest of glimpses of Erasmus at training it is clear
his players and staff are in thrall to him. The more his behaviour is
criticised, the higher his pedestal. You may think condemnation from a
World Cup?winning captain in John Smit may elicit some form of remorse.
Or wonder how they will react to comments from England’s forwards coach
Matt Proudfoot, who worked under Erasmus during the victorious 2019
World Cup campaign, that “the Springboks is a brand designed to bring
hope to the country”.
But all we get is a
snapshot of the siege mentality Erasmus has fostered with his outbursts.
That, you suspect, was the point of them all along.
“We
know what happens within us,” Nienaber said. “We can’t control
narratives of other people’s opinions about us. Whatever people think
about us, they will think about us. We know what happens inside and how
we are and how tight we are as a group.
“In
terms of Rassie’s ban, we focus on rugby and I guess there will be a lot
of questions about the ban. As a coach, I don’t want to go into those
things. I will focus on the rugby more. Sometimes, it’s disappointing
when there are only certain facts that go out and then people from the
outside obviously only have those facts that are available and they form
an opinion on something that has happened. And obviously they don’t
know all the facts. It’s quite sad if you think about it. If all the
facts are out there, people would form a different opinion.”
Nienaber
is an intelligent man and “unfortunately things went that way” is the
closest he comes to directly addressing Erasmus’s ban. But whenever he
tries to take the subject back to his team’s preparations – hampered
because he cannot select players based in England or France with this
match outside the official Test window – he gives only the impression of
fiddling while Rome burns. He somewhat tied himself in knots too, when
pressed on what the “facts” he refers to are. “It probably will come
out,” he said. “You know that there is a lot of confidentiality that
we’re not allowed to talk about, especially with media. I’m not the only
coach that would say that. Eddie [Jones] has said that before. It’s
stuff we can’t discuss. But we know the facts.”
Sign up to The Breakdown
Free weekly newsletter
The latest rugby union news and analysis, plus all the week's action reviewed
Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.Faf de Klerk played a key role in South Africa’s 63-21 win against Italy last Saturday. Photograph: Timothy Rogers/Getty ImagesThis
sounds like more conspiracy theorising until he is asked specifically
if he means facts not widely available about refereeing decisions. “No,
just in terms of development and where our game is going, certain
skill?sets we are trying to develop – stuff like that. Not refereeing
stuff, rugby stuff. Technical, fundamental stuff. Gameplan.”
Confused?
You wouldn’t be alone, but he goes on, questioning the narrative that
the Springboks are “boring” and wondering if they will ever get the
“respect” they deserve.
“That’s what I mean
when I say the facts aren’t all out there,” he said. “People form an
opinion on style of play. We can’t control the narrative that gets put
out there that we’re boring, we don’t attack, we just kick, we just
tackle. All the energy you put into that, you’re not going to change
that narrative. If we’ll get respect, ever, I don’t know. As long as
we’re comfortable with what we’re putting out there and what we’re
trying to achieve, and are open and honest with each other and as a
group – players, management, staff members – we’re happy.”
Never more so, it seems, than when the world is against them.
Topics
Reus