FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  NZ 7s vs blitzbok cup final,,,

NZ 7s vs blitzbok cup final,,,

Started by Monkey D Luffy56 REPLIES1,020 VIEWS· 05 May 2013, 20:12
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 20:12
#1
05 May 2013, 20:12#1

exciting finals ahead with the NZ sevens and Blitsboks playing each other in scotlands cup final.

will the boys in green win and help leviate the pain and avenge the well deserved losses that two SA spXV heavyweights have suffered by NZs middle dogs???

or will the NZ 7s put the icing on the cake to their 11th world sevens title and top notch wins over the stormers, sharks, rebels and brumbies???

good luck to both teams, will update during the game for all the brus who might be interested, :o)

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 20:16
#2
05 May 2013, 20:16#2

after watching the blitzboks beat england in the smeis and NZ beat wales, i have to say the blitzers looked to be the more energetic of the two, while the kiwis looked very fatigued, o_O

hope this isnt a sign of things to come, i remeber the tokyo 7s where SA literally blitzed NZ in the finals.

france have just won the sheild final after beating spain.

KA
KalaedFreddieClub Pro495 posts
05 May 2013, 21:19
#3
05 May 2013, 21:19#3

 A few good games and some very good individual skills - how's this Zack Test from USA - not bad?

 

SA vs NZ - may the best team win and the ref have a quiet game..

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 21:43
#4
05 May 2013, 21:43#4

uh-oh, i just found out that the referees 2nd cousins postmans next door negihbours uncles dog was once owned by a NZer.
according to some folks on this forum, that means NZ will win, o_O

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 21:45
#5
05 May 2013, 21:45#5

a saffa ref for a saffa vs NZ game, o_O

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 21:47
#6
05 May 2013, 21:47#6

seabelo try after a nice cut back in from the wing, :o(

come on boys lets bounce back, :o)

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 21:48
#7
05 May 2013, 21:48#7

NZ respond immediately with a try to raikabula after baker inside pass to stowers who cuts in some weak defence.

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 21:50
#8
05 May 2013, 21:50#8

intercept for the kiwis but some nice scrambling defence from the boks to recover, thats some mad gas.

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 21:53
#9
05 May 2013, 21:53#9

referee calls forward pass which is a bit dodgy. havent seen the replay yet though.

dipenaar taken of for a sub.

boks muck up the scrum and knock it on.

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 21:54
#10
05 May 2013, 21:54#10

try to NZ from baker after a brilliant kick from cama inside when boks were scrambling with their defence.

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 21:57
#11
05 May 2013, 21:57#11

halftime, 14-7 NZ lead.

 

very close game though, still anyones game, no surprises but timosi cama seems to be the key for the NZers.

SA not helped with two injury forced subs.

good game so far, :o)

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 22:01
#12
05 May 2013, 22:01#12

stowers is yellow carded.

steven hunt scores a try on the wing after boks spread it out wide where NZ were a man short.

14 all.

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 22:02
#13
05 May 2013, 22:02#13

offload from mickelson to baker who kicks ahead. he had the gas but ball went out.
3:30sec left.
 

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 22:04
#14
05 May 2013, 22:04#14

cama is subbed and hes not liking it, LMAO. :oP

get off u clown, team first.

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 22:06
#15
05 May 2013, 22:06#15

try to blitz boks after a stupid kick fro baker inside his own goal. good pressure from the boks.

21-14 SA lead.

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 22:08
#16
05 May 2013, 22:08#16

try to hendricks after good sustained pressure from the boks.

all but official is this SA victory with a 28-14 lead and 2 and half mins left, :o(
 

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 22:09
#17
05 May 2013, 22:09#17

try to NZ with 30secs left,,,,,,could it be the comeback??? o_O

 

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
05 May 2013, 22:11
#18
05 May 2013, 22:11#18

messy scramble at the kick off, SA kick the ball out.

Blitzboks win 28-21.

congrats blitzboks, great finals match, :o)

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
05 May 2013, 22:21
#19
05 May 2013, 22:21#19

 saSUE one has to ask this after three consecutive wins by the Blitzbokke over the kiwis. Are the kiwis becoming the blitzbokke bunnies. Hahahahahahhaha

Wonder what ou abnob thinks. 

True should get in Rhule and Seargal Pietersen. Cecil Afrika is also an excellent sevens player. That black youngster Senekal, or whatever his name is, is the fastest guy around. Size not so important here.

 

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
05 May 2013, 22:31
#20
05 May 2013, 22:31#20

 Ex Keo:

South Africa’s Sevens Boks are the champions of Glasgow but New Zealand’s All Blacks are the champions of the world.

The Boks beat New Zealand 28-21 for a third World Series Tournament win of the year but the Kiwis, courtesy of their consistency all season, were crowned World Series Champions for the 11th time in 14 seasons.

New Zealand has won just one tournament this year but invariably they played in the final or semi-final whereas South Africa’s inconsistency in the early part of the Series ensured they were never in contention for the main season prize.

Paul Treu’s side were outstanding in Glasgow, as they were in Tokyo. They have now backed up in successive tournaments. They also hammered New Zealand to win the Las Vegas Sevens.

They also won in Glasgow without two of their best players in Cecil Africa and Branco du Preez.

Looks like nz are not very worthy champs - only one tournament win -Blitzbokke have three!

Blitzbokke on the rise! Writing on the wall stuff?

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
06 May 2013, 01:46
#21
06 May 2013, 01:46#21

@beeno1 aka storminged,

blitzbok on the rise??? absolutely, theyve been on the rise since 2008/2009 when they won their first and only world series.
in that series, Blitsboks faced fiji in two finlas and lost them both, so u are of the opinon that Blitzboks and their one and only title were not deserved victors??? good to know, :o)

blitzboks were without two of thier best players, but so were NZ and they had another two frontline players missing too. not surprised that keo didnt mention that, its why no one tkaes them seriously except for cocaine snorters

its a shame NZ didnt beat the blitzboks in any of the finals matches, but we did beat the Blitzboks in the semis in front of their homecrowd when NZ won the SA series, so that lightens the mood a little, lolz, :oP

SA need to realise though that u may have won the battle, but u lost the war, hence NZs 11 titles from 14 tournaments and SA 1 title from 14 tournaments.


congrats NZ for another deserved world title and if we make the semis in the lodon 7s, NZ becomes the only team in the world to have played in all the semis, :o)

MO
moolaaPro2,380 posts
06 May 2013, 02:01
#22
06 May 2013, 02:01#22

Hasbeeno, we have a problem in NZ. Where do we fit the World 7s Trophy in our cabinet?

It may just fit between the World & Bledisloe Cups which means that inconsequential trophy (can't remember it's name) that we play the Boks for will have to be pushed back a bit!

BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
06 May 2013, 03:21
#23
06 May 2013, 03:21#23

Moolaa, why dont you put the trophy right next to the shrine you have of Bryce Lawrence. Afterall, without him, you would not have the World Cup trophy. The way SA were playing, you were never going to win that world cup. Hell, you should have a shrine of Craig Joubert too because he tried his best to make sure NZL beat the French. Haha such a dominant display by the French but some ridiculously low penalty count with players like McCaw on the field. Haha what a farce that world cup was. Trust NZL to host the most farcical WC ever. Sail through the pool stages (easiest by a long way) and then make sure the most bent son of a slut is in charge of the Aussie Bok game so their "easier" ride continues!!

 

The Nelson Mandela cup means nothing to you, but then again, you mean nothing to rugby. To the AB team and coaching staff that means everything!

MO
moolaaPro2,380 posts
06 May 2013, 07:27
#24
06 May 2013, 07:27#24

Oops, struck a nerve there Logic!

Talking of farces, how about the late (and not great) Louis Luyt presenting Derek Bevan the Welsh referee with a gold watch after the 1995 World Cup Semi for disallowing Benazzi's certain last minute try against the Boks which would've eliminated them and therefore negated the need to poison the ABs for the Final?

That's a farce!

Oh and I forgot to mention the Rugby Championship Trophy before....where oh where are we going to store that?

By the way Logic, the Nelson Mandela Trophy is played between the Boks and Wallabies.......Logic once again proving himself  a mastermind of all things rugby...NOT!

BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
06 May 2013, 08:46
#25
06 May 2013, 08:46#25

Ah sorry Moolaa, Freedom cup. Shows how much I care about that trophy. Means something to the players, not me.

 

Louis Luyt presented the watch to Derek Bevan AFTER the game, not before. Its not like he said, hey, make sure we win. Here is a gold watch for you to make sure that happens. He presented it at a dinner after the game had been played. Needless to say, Bevan did not accept and walked out of the room. If it had been something they had spoken about, surely Bevan would have said do not present it to me in public. Shows how innocent Louis Luyt was in his gesture that he did it on stage in front of many onlookers. Back then, he would not have thought anything of it. Only in the modern professional era would a coach think about that. Now why oh why I ask with tears in my eyes, would he do something like that in such an open environment if there was a motive behind it and would it not have been done pre game? Would he not have done it under covers and would Bevan do it for a watch?? Get real.

 

What was done undercovers though was Bryce Lawrence but I still believe the truth will come out one day. Bryce was quick to lose his job as a backlash from Kiwi's to get him out of the spot light before the weak son of a bitch cracks and confesses and brings NZL rugby into further disrepute! Thats what happened there. Get him of the world stage, let him fade into the background before he cracks under pressure, just like the AB's of 1995 and 1999, and 2003 and 2007 ;-) Bryce was your guinea pig to make sure you guys didnt crack again at the hands of the Boks but it almost backfired as the French smashed you up and old Joubert had a tough time trying to keep his whistle in his pocket when ou McCaw was frantically digging around the rucks to save his team.

Joubert must have been like, " Fuck sakes Richie. I am doing everything possible here but this is getting obvious now. Start fucken playing rugby because there is only 1 team on this field at the moment!! Is this how you repay Bryce? You ruin his career then choke in the final to a team you walked over in pool play?"

Richie, "There is nothing we can do Craig! Our wee forwards are blowing hard. We cant stop this French flair and passion! They are all over us! Just keep your whistle in your pocket. If we lose yet another WC, I will kill myself! I cant handle the questions that come after it. Not again. Please Craig. PLEASE!!"

KA
KalaedFreddieClub Pro495 posts
06 May 2013, 10:29
#26
06 May 2013, 10:29#26

 Great game!  If the AB-&s need someone to blame, look no further than Stowers - that was plain stupid to do what he did right infront of the posts.  Two trangressions - did not heed the 10 meter rule and he played the ball while lying on his side/back.  The subbing of the playmaker Cama may also have been a bit premature.  But, hey, I am not complaining the Bokke won this one but the games between these two teams is mostly like flipping a coin...any one can win.

BE
Beeno1Captain40,032 posts
06 May 2013, 11:00
#27
06 May 2013, 11:00#27

Hhahahahahahaha excellent post Bok Logc. The kiwis and  mooooo   la have been scholled but I warn you their capacity t olearn is very limited!!

I fully agree craig was bad in that final and haneded to cup to the abs. A great blot on our refs I have to say. French were by some way the superior side and the French were as we also know pretty average. Quite rightl ydid the french players complain tha tthe ref didnt want them to in the game itwas sooooo obvious.

If you have any doubts watch this:

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuIuXrwPCcc&feature=youtu.be

saSUE you have lost the last three matches played against the Blitzbokke and all were finals. At what point in time does this become a problem? It would seem to me the Blitzbokke have the wood on you guys?

Wouldnt it be nice if this ref issue would go away and kiwis suddenly would become honest fair go mate types? Wishful thinking alas!

 

MD
Monkey D LuffyPro6,277 posts
06 May 2013, 13:28
#28
06 May 2013, 13:28#28

@beeno1 aka storminged,

"saSUE you have lost the last three matches played against the Blitzbokke and all were finals. At what point in time does this become a problem? It would seem to me the Blitzbokke have the wood on you guys?"

did u even watch the series???

regardless, the world sevens is a different kettle of fish, while its alway nice to win the tournaments, the No1 goal is to win the series, something that NZ did quite easily with consistent top 3 standings in every single tournament this sereis, a feat that is currently unheard of.
but ur right, the Blitzboks do have the wood on the NZ 7s team at the moment and while im happy to be the world champions again, we need to make a statement in the london 7s and win it, especially if we face the blitzboks. i dont want them to start getting a psychological edge on us, they are a good enough team already.
we also need to consider the olympics which dosent care how well u preform throughout the year, only how well u preform in rio, so a top 3 finish would be an failure as gold is the one and only result, so time for the kiwis to start winning some tournaments, hopefully starting with the final one of the year the london 7s.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
06 May 2013, 13:43
#29
06 May 2013, 13:43#29

Sasue

I commented elsewhere about theissue of the Sevens series.   I am of the opinion that the point sttructure of the series favours consistency of the team throughout the series - not necessarily tournament wins.   Provided a team is constantly in the top four in each tournament - they can be tops in the series as a whole.   The opposing team can win half of the tournaments and if they do badly in 2 -they will not be the series champion.

That is what happened in this case.   Despite just one wictory in seven tournaments this year - the All Blacks is way out on top of the log.   This is largely the rsult of yo-yo performances by the other teams in the competition.  Although winning three out of seven tournaments - the Blitzbokke fell off the bus in the Dubhai and  Hong Kong tournaments and that put pay to their chances of really been competitive on the final log.

With a view to the WC in June and in the longer run - the Olympics in 2016 - I believe the All Blacks should do what they did in the past on a regular basis - that is to be regular tournament winners as well.   At this stage they are bridesmaids - never the bride.   They can have one consolation - it only happened once before - namely that the same team that won the Glasgow (preiously the Edinbourgh)  tournament win the London tournament a week later.  That leaves the door open for the All Blacks to win this one - but it is a very small opening at that.

Hope they do well.     

AL
allblacknblueClub Pro233 posts
06 May 2013, 18:36
#30
06 May 2013, 18:36#30

Yes I agree everything should be done to suit those whinging saffa's. You lads are worse than the poms and aussies, hang your heads, cause I would if i was you lot.

BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
06 May 2013, 23:56
#31
06 May 2013, 23:56#31

Allblacknblue, forgive me on this but its hard to take u blokes seriously in your whinging comments about Saffas when you still pin 95' WC on the mysterious Suzie and a gold watch, 2007 on a ref when your boys just couldnt get the job done and everything else inbetween. You guys are also the proud owners of Bryce Lawrence and Glen Jackson so please forgive us when we take you lot with a pinch of salt.

 

If there should be any head hanging, it should be coming out of NZL.

PA
PapamoaClub Pro683 posts
07 May 2013, 00:18
#32
07 May 2013, 00:18#32

 Book logic you make me laugh if nothing else. Keep it up, have to love your commitment and passion. 

MO
moolaaPro2,380 posts
07 May 2013, 02:30
#33
07 May 2013, 02:30#33

Logic, I think the word "naive" was invented for plonkers like you.

Louis Luyt innocent? He deliberately went out of his way to publicly present the watch to Bevan to stick it up the ABs and the world rugby hierarchy in general! Why would he give him the watch PRIOR to the match when the service had yet to be rendered??

 To make matters worse he then attempted to belittle the 1987 & 1991 World Cups by stating the Boks would've won those tournaments if they'd been allowed to compete. I notice he didn't come forward in 1999, 2003 and 2011 to explain why the Boks didn't win those as well but guess he was probably dribbling custard by that stage anyway.

Thanks for the insight into the conversation between Richie and Craig by the way. You do have some great sources.

Oh and tell Hasbeeno I haven't been "scholled" at all and it's about time he went back to "scholl" (which I believe was Broederbond Elementary) to study English.

BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
07 May 2013, 04:00
#34
07 May 2013, 04:00#34

Ha ha so what you saying Moolaa is that the AB's knew they would not beat the Boks. Remember, if what you say is true (and its not), that happened in the semi-final. We played the French, not AB's! Its not like he blew the AB's out of the match. You are admitting that the AB's never stood a chance against SA?? Probably about right.

 

If you believe that Luyt did that in the way you say then you are more naive than I thought. No guy in their right mind would do that. Why would Luyt subject himself to that? Use your head.

This is just a deflection from you for the confirmed cheat Bryce Lawrence. Use your investigative skills and get to the bottom of that one!!

MO
moolaaPro2,380 posts
07 May 2013, 04:14
#35
07 May 2013, 04:14#35

Luyt did it cos he was a rich arrogant ponce and he knew he would get away with it! There was no way the IRB was going to create a stink after SA's "fairytale" win and upstage Nelson Mandela's time in the limelight and undermine the newly united SA, racial harmony etc etc.

Bevan ruled out the try to keep the Boks IN the Cup, not to penalise the ABs you idiot!

And I think we've proved on multiple occasions that we can indeed beat the Boks......witness again our trophy cabinet.

I believe your cabinet is in the care of one Ms Hubbard at present and she reckons she's got the job for life!

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
07 May 2013, 07:49
#36
07 May 2013, 07:49#36

moolaa

I am sorry you went on to make that kind of remark about Dr Luyt - who recently passed away.   I know him well and was on friendly terms with him - and can assure you that he was anything but a ponch.   In any event as far as I am aware  that watch was a gift after the game was played - not before the game - so I think you are talking crap in this case.

I admire the All Blacks for their achievements on the rugby field and give them credit where credit is due.   I do not admire the rubbsih often enough spouted in this form by either SA or New Zealand members of this site.  The 1995, 2007 and 2011 World Cups are history and nothing we write about it can change the fact - what should be the norm is present rugby performances and what is happening in 2013 and from there onwards.  That is really my view on issues. 

 

BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
07 May 2013, 08:34
#37
07 May 2013, 08:34#37

Moolaa, you are the only dunce kop here. You talk shit you know nothing about. The watch was presented after the game. The "try" that the french scored was not a clear cut try and we did not have the benefit of tv match officials. Bevan had to make a call with 10 bodies lying over the ball. You name one ref today that would award that try without consulting a tv ref? You would have to be a very brave man or very certain! Its the same way umpires cant rule on run outs that are really close. It happens too fast!

Some calls go your way some dont and if that was a French try, its just one of those things but Bevan was unsure therfore can not award a try. He did the right thing and you know it. You will never admit it because you are a fool but that is the truth.

 

Yes, NZL had the more polished team in 95'. Yes, if that game was played 10 times, NZL might have won 9 of them but they didnt win the one that counted and that hurts you more than anything doesn't it. You had 1 shot at it and you blew it. The Boks were simply the better team on the day. Your secret weapon in Lomu went a whole career without scoring a try against the mighty BOKKE. ha ha we are just too good. Dont keep referring to your trophy cabinet like we are in awe of you. We saw the run you had to the WC final. We associate that cup with Bryce Lawrences face. It was a farce and yet again, you guys blew it. It took a kiwi ref to get rid of the Boks and a Bok ref to ensure you tossers won..How ironic! Biggest joke in WC history the 2011 edition!!

MO
moolaaPro2,380 posts
07 May 2013, 08:44
#38
07 May 2013, 08:44#38

Mike, read my posts again! The watch was of course given AFTER the game....just like I said. Why can't you blokes understand plain English? I was pointing out to Thicklogic that it would be pointless giving the watch prior to the game when Bevan hadn't even reffed your semi yet!!!!!!

And I know you guys are  not in awe of us, but it sure winds jerks like Logic & Pedsman up, oh and Hasbeeno too!

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
07 May 2013, 09:42
#39
07 May 2013, 09:42#39

moolaa

You can deal with the other posters anyway you deem fit - but the insult of the late Dr Luyt was really uncalled for.  As any amount of hankering to the past will help here - and it is best to ignore rubbish when it appears in this forum and concentrate on facts and the future.

I am really a supporter of any teams playing well - but critical if they do have deficiencies that is clear in the games in question - irrespective of the counntry of origin of the teams.  However, unlike some members I do not spare the local sides - and that includes the Springboks - from criticism when they deserve it.  I am probably harsher in my criticism of SA teams than I am of any opposing teams and that I believe is a sound way to deal with issues. .

BO
BoklogicPro1,978 posts
07 May 2013, 14:01
#40
07 May 2013, 14:01#40

 Hey brain thats never gona make any moolaa, you calling Derek Bevan out on 1 call that has never gone down as a "wonder" of rugby. The man could not award a try. He did not have the luxury of a TMO..It was inconclusive if the try was scored therefore it could not be awarded. Same rules applied to every team!

 

The way you speak, you would swear blind Bevan blew the French out the game ala Bryce Lawrence... I suppose in your books, Dr Luyt told Bevan, in the last play of the game, Benazzi is going to cross the line for a try. Make sure you do not award it!! ha ha it was one incident and I ask you to please have a look at the clip and tell me where you see the ball cross the line:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AmSK-IkzK0

 

If you cant see it in real time, how can Bevan. ha ha you are delusional. If you wana see cheating, search bryce clips on youtube..

↓ LOAD MORE (page 2 of 2)

More from Rugby

More news