FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  NZ Rugby Lacks 'Emphasis On Morals'

NZ Rugby Lacks 'Emphasis On Morals'

Started by Augenöffner13 REPLIES751 VIEWS· 15 Jul 2019, 12:30
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
15 Jul 2019, 12:30
#1
15 Jul 2019, 12:30#1

A recent study has reaffirmed Sir Graham Henry's famous line that "better people make better All Blacks".

A University of Otago study, published in the International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, has called for moral and social values to be considered by New Zealand Rugby in the selection process.

The study found NZ Rugby has a list of socially oriented "character assessment values", including work ethic, competitiveness, resilience, coachability, and motivation in rugby, which they use to assess players' character during the selection process.

However, authors of the study Professor Tania Cassidy and Ryan Rosevear reported that while these values all directly impact performance, leading international character academics recommend a focus also be placed on moral values, specifically compassion, fairness, sportspersonship and integrity.

"NZR lacks clear emphasis on moral values," said Rosevear. "This reflects other researchers' claims that principles such as honesty and sportspersonship are not often emphasised in elite team sports because they do not win matches."

The pair called on NZ Rugby to consider incorporating values with a moral, as well as social focus, and encourage open discussion about why some values are prioritised and not others.

"The findings of this study are significant not only for rugby, in New Zealand and elsewhere, but they are also relevant and topical for any recruitment agent, employer, selector, or sports coach who either implicitly or explicitly appoints, promotes, selects or deselects participants based on character," said Cassidy.

New Zealand Rugby has been approached for comment by NZME.

The study comes at a time when moral judgements on sports stars, especially rugby players, have become a hot topic of discussion, with Israel Folau and Rugby Australia's contract battle becoming a much-debated issue that has transcended sporting lines.

The All Blacks have also recently come under fire for their moral judgment, or lack thereof, after the selection of Crusaders winger Sevu Reece for the upcoming Rugby Championship.

In October, Reece was discharged without conviction in the Hamilton District Court on one count of male assaults female, which he admitted to, and has since gone on to have a strong season for the Super Rugby champion Crusaders.

All Blacks coach Steven Hansen strongly defended Reece's selection saying the 22-year-old deserves a chance to better himself, despite criticism from the public about the selection.

Along with gaining insight into how character is understood within NZ Rugby, the researchers at Otago University also studied how the player development manager of a provincial union negotiates, constructs and operationalises interpretations of character within talent identification and development practices.

They found the provincial union adapted the NZ Rugby's character assessment values to produce its own list of ideals, reflecting its context and the values of its stakeholders.

"In contrast to the NZR, the provincial union does emphasise some moral values, such as compassion, integrity and being a role model. These are not often correlated to performance, but stress an importance on developing the person," said Rosevear.

The study acknowledges that NZ Rugby have done well to explicitly identify and utilise certain values as determinants of expected and desired behaviour, and encourage coaches and selectors to assess and judge a player's character against them.

However, the researchers also hope the organisation recognises its selectors use both overt and implied values to assess players.

NZHerald

This is just the foot in the door to artificially engineer the male population. Removing leaders from society, creating more submissive cowards. Another step in down the road of pre-civilisation, as those with no morals claim to be the sole determiners of morality. Using this power to promote mental illnesses and the most dysfunctional expressions of masculinity and femininity. It couldn't be more transparent. As an aside, this reminds me of a scene in RoboCop where he is reprogrammed to be friendlier. 

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
15 Jul 2019, 13:57
#2
15 Jul 2019, 13:57#2

That's a laugh.

How can you bring morals into a squad that's coached to cheat?

Morals, integrity and any form of sportsmanship have long flown the coop.

 


CR
CrusadersfanPro3,099 posts
16 Jul 2019, 03:19
#3
16 Jul 2019, 03:19#3

CC he is talking about the All Blacks not The Boks, and everyone already knows the Boks don't need to be coached to cheat it just comes naturally also the Boks have never had morals, integrity or sportsmanship.

AU
AugenöffnerPro6,974 posts
16 Jul 2019, 03:52
#4
16 Jul 2019, 03:52#4

Did you know that Crusaderfan backwards is a homonym of naf-shred-a-surk. Naff is quite fitting, and surk being one who annoys one's neighbours with unpleasant noises. Do not fret, I don't intend to harm thee. 

MO
moolaaPro2,380 posts
16 Jul 2019, 05:53
#5
16 Jul 2019, 05:53#5
Aug, you need to check on the definition of “homonym “.....
ND
NdabaningiClub Pro116 posts
16 Jul 2019, 07:15
#6
16 Jul 2019, 07:15#6

Which signifies greater moral poverty? (a) screwing a woman in a public toilet or (b) a woman willing to be screwed in a public toilet. 

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
16 Jul 2019, 07:36
#7
16 Jul 2019, 07:36#7

It's a 50/50 or 6 of one or a half dozen of another.

ND
NdabaningiClub Pro116 posts
16 Jul 2019, 08:14
#8
16 Jul 2019, 08:14#8

I'm not so sure it's a 50/50 Denny. Consider it from an evolutionary point of view. The female of the species which is generally heavily inclined to hygiene must surely find it difficult to copulate in the unsanitary environment of a public toilet. However, we're talking kiwi (an animal from the lower orders) here, so my argument may not apply.

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
16 Jul 2019, 08:23
#9
16 Jul 2019, 08:23#9

Your original post is a straight up and down question, nothing complicated.....my response is in answer to that. I suggest we keep it that way unless you have another agenda in mind? 

ND
NdabaningiClub Pro116 posts
16 Jul 2019, 08:32
#10
16 Jul 2019, 08:32#10

Your original post is a straight up and down question, nothing complicated.....my response is in answer to that. I suggest we keep it that way unless you have another agenda in mind? 

I could not have limned it with greater clarity, celerity, and appreciation of motive, meself. You're clearly far too astute to be wasting your time on this meaningless little forum. Have you considered a teaching position?

DE
DennyCaptain12,893 posts
16 Jul 2019, 08:37
#11
16 Jul 2019, 08:37#11

Oh dear.....

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
16 Jul 2019, 08:42
#12
16 Jul 2019, 08:42#12

Haaaaaaaaahahahahahaaaa!!

Nothing like copulating with the stench of sheeeaat wafting around in the air to bring out ones morals, rights Saderfan?



RO
RooinekCaptain18,117 posts
16 Jul 2019, 10:34
#13
16 Jul 2019, 10:34#13
Interesting that the same people having a go at Sevu Reece for domestic violence are the same people saying what a wonderful person James Small was.
That's either very ignorant or very selective.
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
16 Jul 2019, 12:49
#14
16 Jul 2019, 12:49#14

James Small had his problems, we all know that...but he made an clear effort to learn from his mistakes and make amends...Reece might too.

James Small article mentioning his domestic violence

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news