01 Apr 2018, 11:06#5
Whine,whine, whinge, yawn...

sharkbok
Captain23,256 posts

sharkbokCaptain23,256 posts
01 Apr 2018, 12:44#11
Super rugby fans should be given a reason why a TV referee is allowed to make decisions without showing the evidence on the big screen. The third umpire is used to improve objectivity and consistency from the use of technology, although in this instance it is unclear if the technology was used, or it was just ignored.
03 Apr 2018, 11:44#15
The local TV crews will obviously favour the local team. It is the same here as it is in Aus and NZ, but in this case, I must agree with Sharkbok. Why not just show the replay, so everyone can see why a certain decision was made? I am pretty objective when it comes to rugby, and very often criticise both my teams and their coaches, but this incident does seem irregular.

sharkbok
Captain23,256 posts

sharkbokCaptain23,256 posts
04 Apr 2018, 01:19#17
It is certainly contentious- regardless of "where" it occurred. If it was a test match- or even close SuperRugby match-all fans would in uproar about this. It does not establish a good precedent just leaving things open-ended with no explanation of how this misdemeanour happened.