OOm care to comment on this monster blunder

 
Status: Hall Of Fame 
Posts: 12998RE: The worst Bok player calls in Board history
September 21, 2014, 22:11:38 Sorry - I saw Janjies and my name - so was wrong in that regard - apologiies for that one.
Went to Perth toi see the 2008 test - which we lost.   Jacobs were poor that day .   I do not like reporters assessment sof players - they are normally selective and off the mark.                                                                                                                                       

Spot the error OOm. I have highlighted some material that might give you a hint.  

 Never has a poster been more exposed....do you have a defence OOm?

 What was wrong with the test in Perth or Jacobs?   You are talking crap again!!!!!!!!  

 What was wrong with the test in Perth or Jacobs?   You are talking crap again!!!!!!!!  

What was wrong old chap is that Jacobs wasn't playing....seems it was you who was talking crap.....again.  

So are you saying Jacobs sort of disappeared that day OOm?  

 Mozart
He was on the plane on the way back - big mouth and all - but in checking I found he in fact did not play - it was between  Jantjies, Pietersen, De Villiers and Francois Steyn that they buggered up the defense that day.   Can remember Mortlock and Tuigri scoring tries.   Missed tackle ratio was  23,3% between those four players.   The slim Francois Steyn was not too bad - the rest was poor.        

 Mozart
The Boks were in the Business class seats.  The team staff back in the third, fourth anf fith row.  I was in the fifth row of the economy class seats as well - and Hoskins was way back in the economy class seats.   
Jacobs was amongst the business class seats - but constantly came out to speak to other team staff.     So what i can say about you?   UYour personal remarks are disgusting - suitable for  pigsty inhabitant - so bugger off, twit.  
Incidentally I had a long chat with peter grant - an absolute gentleman - when waiting for our luggage.   All th players were joking with the other travellers - signed things and had phtos taken with them - except Luke Watson - who was as surly and unfrendly as possible.

Just tell the truth Dumbo

 Mozaret
You would not recgnize the truth if it slaps you nin the face - because you h ave [erverted the word.   

Says the guy who right on this string is exposed as a liar and not for the first time. By contrast, Nobody in over a decade of posting has ever caught me in a lie. Quite a contrast. And not surprisingly you have no shame OOm. Your type of habitual liar thinks you can just divert and deny. It may fool a few people, but everybody who opens this thread will have no doubt...you were lying through your teeth. Disgusting stuff.

 Moi\zart
Your every description of what happened on the field of play - is 90% lies and 10% suppositions - never the truth.  You were caught lieing too many times to even expect that you know the difference between the truth and lies.    

Give one example.

 When one missed tackle becomes missed tackles - when one penalty becomes penalties.   When one player only is blamed for the Ellis Park test loss - while the other players who buggered up worse are not mentioned.   Virtually everu description of what happened on the field of play is so warped - it is unbeleivable.
I can write a book about your stories about players - and the invention of lnicknames for players - without any grounds whatsoever for it.   When you do not like a player he makes "process tackles" - a player making worse quality tackles is never making "process tackles".   
When one player flops in defnese another player gets the blame.  
Anybody realizes that your denouncement of players are normally based on untruths and half-truths.   A nd then it happened without you having watch some of the games you make big announcements about.   

Rubbish....JJ was involved in at least 4 incidents that turned the test.
 His miss of Savea up the left touchline, leading to the Messam try. 
His overrun of a set move near the AB line, the kind of move that resulted in the Hendricks try against the ABs...but that was expertly finished. 
His isolating of himself at the half, failure to keep his feet, failure to place the ball and subsequent missed tackle on Nonu that led to Messams next try.
His miss on Barrett when he was the only player who made full contact, leading to the RC winning try.
After which HM put him on the back burner. All real incidents, all points impacting incidents in which JJ had an undeniable role. Others did as well, but if he did his job properly, you have a potential 28 point score swing.
If that's your best example, you better shuttup.

 So I mwnrioned JJ and there is an escape mechanism.  Morne missed four tackles - two opf which resulted in tries - he buggered up when he went blank and instead of kicking for touch - he pased the ball - Alberts missed one tackle elading to a try - adwhen he was in an excellent position to recove a tackle ball that would have prevented an AB try - he fell over his own feet.   That accounts for four of the five tries scored by the All Blacks.   The above itest is one eexample where two of you favourites are eqwaully to blame for the loss - but only one player - who made in essence only one blunder - he should not have been put in a position where he made th second one - gets blamed and two others - who were even worse - but happene to be players favoured by you - gets exonerated.
Mozart the tragedy ois that you get so carreid away - you do not realize you lre lieing in an effort to disceredit some players.    That is why you get caught out eat.   Traggic really - that a person who I am sure is honest and straightforwqard come onto this Board and descend to lies to discredit rugby players he dislikes.   
You have been told a number of times not to multiply incidents - and you are aware that you have domne so numerous times.   One penalty is ONE Penalty - not multiple Penalties - one Missed tackle is ONE missed tackle - not Multiple missed tackles.   
   

So you say about me:

" you do not realize you are lieing"

But the definition of a lie is:
" a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood"
....sadly that definition precludes your view that I am unknowingly lying.. What easy meat you are OOm. But seriously, we have a right to expect that posters don't get it wrong all the time, or conveniently forget a truth they should have known. Clean up your act.

 Mo\zart
Better clean up yours - you make it sounds like you can say anthing on this site - true or otherwise - and gets away with it.    

Speaking about reviving three year old classics.....here is another classic Tokkie lie......through his rotting yellow teeth.

 Mozart
That is a small blunder since it was a mistake I recognized and accept that I was wrong.  I did not follow your normal approach - misrepresentation and outright lies - easily identified from the video clips you post yourself.  I may be wrong in a few cxases - but I am not a bloody liar like you.  
     

Thinking Jacobs may have played in the game, when he didn't, could have been a mistake......claiming he was poor that day was a bare faced lie. Here's another: ... Old Tokkie asks why Frans should be a priority at centre when he has only played 20 per cent of his tests at centre. " The question is what makes him an absolute necessity at 12 if he had comparatively little playing time at test level as a center if nearly 80% of his tests was not played in that position? " Asks Tokkie....Good logic bad facts. Frans has started in 36 tests...the rest as a sub. In those 36 tests, one was at flyhalf, one was on the wing, 14 were at fullback and 20 were at centre. Just another in the long string of Tokkie lies.

 The 14 at FB were his best tests.

Some might say his tests at centre for the Boks at WC 2007 were his best. Still I'm sure you have studied all the data Draad so who am I to disagree. Nice to have you back and posting. Where were you? Somewhere without the internet like Bellville?

Mozart, Clevermike must be doing better these days if you have to troll through posts back as far as 2014 to find something to bait him with, lol

Not really.....I just remembered my "Eat Crow" series of 10 or so strings where I docu.mented his lies, which makes it easy to find. There are plenty of Tokkie lies of late.

 There are constant Mozart lies all the time.   To be expected from a moron like you 0 the supreme idiot on site cannot help it when it comes to player performances and then he is stupid enough to post video clips, showing he did lie.  What a moron!!!!!        

'Moron, supreme idiot, stupid'.....gosh you must be a smart fellow: .. So show us, solve this Tokkie: . f(x)= 5 x squared-20x+15 . There I have reduced the number of variables and promoted you to standard 7....solve for the two roots of X, give us your best answer Einstein.

 Is that A RUGBY issue - stooge?  I said repeatedly you are a RUGBY ILLITIRTATE,  I AM PREOARED TO DISCUSS RUGBY ISSUES WITH ANYBODY - hot anything else liar,  

I'm a rugby "ILLITIRTATE" ......hilarious.

You are and that was proven time and time again.  You have no clue about what is expected from players and has been sucking up to players who are and have for a liong time being useless.
Beside that you either lie about player performances or you do not understand anything about the game..      

 give us your best answer Einstein.
Cruel