Ou maaaaikie and other blowhards like rooitwit please confirm

that Stormers will be bottom of log! Bwhahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Beeno 

I thought the Stormers will beat the Sharks and the sad part is that the SA teams take pride in beating themselves.   If you want to check Superbru my forecasted score was the Storemers to win by 3 points,  

Never saw that one coming. I really thought the Sharks were just too good...luckily not!

I analyzed the teams and found that the Stormers Tight 5 will be too strong for the Sharks and O always believe that Esterhuizen is the poor part of their backline and that Du Toit at 7 would be better than the two flanks of the Sharks combined.

Looking at the total picture I went for the Stormers to win.   

You analyzed? When performing these analyses you shake your magic 8 ball. 

Had you listened to Auge you'd have assessed the game correctly. 

Sill Billy stick to grown-up facts not juvenile fiction and you will maybe become logical.  

Ou maaaikie are you now saying you never said the Stormers could end last on the Super rugby log. Time to be honest now ou maaaaiklie!!! Make a special effort please oak!

The Sharks were really awful ... The Stormers were their usual useless self ... and needed the Sharks to lose the match ...

That's two lucky breaks for the f aggots from Cape Town ...

Hahahahahhahaha poor wee cc all bitter and twisted about the Mighty Stormers gaining a great away win. Especially after all his absurd remarks about the Stormers after the loss to the Bools.

Cheer up wee cc the lions can do better. problem is their very small lose trio. Dyamani must not play as a loose forward.

Beeno the sportsmen ever ready to help the Lions better perform and help poor wee cc stop being so unhappy!

That's right Herr Sitzsack, when I said that the Stormers had the pack to take the Shark's backline out of the game Mikey disagreed. When I called out the Shark's lineout, scrum and breakdown he got lippy. Now he apparently called a perfect game. Inspector Hindsight me thinks. 

Well Card, Oom Mike predicted a Stormers win on Superbru, so no Inspector Hindsight methinks.To my shame,  I predicted a Stormers loss.

He guessed the result. The details of how that game was to be played out was disputed by him. He was wrong. This has happened many times in the past. So, he guessed the result, and is now trying to connect that to some kind of rugby acumen to gain credibility. Don't fall for his conniving shenanigans Herr Draht. 

Poor  Silly Billy

He has no idea about players and performance evaluation so you can work out what to expect of you are objective and not besotted,

So how did I work it out:-

The Stormers

Plusses   -   Malherbe, Schickerling, Etzebeth, Du Toit, Petersen on the wing

Minuses  -   Vermaak, Marais

The Sharks    

Plusses    -    Akker can der Merwe, Du Preez, Schreuder, Robert Du Preez, Nkosi,

Minuses   -   Beast, Esterhuizen

The other players are neutrals cancelling each other out.   The Tight 5 forwards of the Stormers are vastly superior to the Sharks and the fact is that Du Toit as MOM and Etzebeth amd Schickerlind was top class in the game.

The backline of the Sharks are superior to the one of the Stormers, but for one major problem case in their mix - namely  Esterhuizen, who was bound to make at least one major bugger-up and in essence is impacting negatively on the flow in their backline.   I was spot on with that assessment.

Now try that out and you would find it works provided you are objective in your pl ayer evaluations,       . 

No Silly Billy - I do not draw names out of a hat - I for one evaluate player performances objectively and see what really happens in games,   I do not write fairy tales about players and try and convince me that they are better or worse than they in fact are, 

As I said I have been following Esterhuizen's performances for years and he is not a proper  12 -  he has too many negatives to be one.   He has had a record for bugger ups in games from the time he played in the under 20 WC - when he knocked on a ball with an open try line ahead of him in a game against England - which the Juniors lost by one point,   He did the same thing in one of his 2018 tests,   

As to his passing game - he is not a player who draws in more than on defender and off -load balls.  When tackled the team he plays for often lose ball possession.   This probably is the result of his pace-deficiency.     

My definition as to Esterhuizen was confirmed  again on Saturday - he is not an asset in any backline - rather a liability.    I do not extract anything from my thumb and especially di not write fairy tales in site - that I leave entirely to you,                

Every word you have spoken is complete tripe. I have provided many references backed by video evidence that disproves everything you have said. Where are these instances of "buggering up games"? Your claims were debunked over the weekend. Even better then that, you rated the worst performing centre of the weekend the best 12 in the team of the week! You're embarrassing yourself in your dire efforts to scrap the barrel clean in your bid to slander André. 

Keep on - in five years time and reading carefully what I write on site may just be enough to teach you some minimal knowledge of player performance evaluation.  That could be a hopeless situation - you have been a farce  for years and nothing has changed in that time. 

Read what I wrote above naming three examples,   There are no evidence of Esterhuizen ever making a really good contribution to matches he played in. 

I do not need to slander your precious Andre - he manages to do it himself week after week. 

Stooge Mc Duck - I changed that to Dylan Sage at 12,   Esteruizen was he worst on Saturday - both Vo rster and De Allende was better than him.   

Listen Silly Billy - when you write garbage does not man you are debunking anything other in your own dim understanding.        

"There are no evidence of Esterhuizen ever making a really good contribution to matches he played in."

Very foolish. Just from last weekends game I can find strong ruck cleans, passes and tackles. Throughout his 2018 test season - which eclipsed that of Damian - I can find dozens of positive contributions. You're falling back on your famed Dummy-Spit defence now. 

Ag Foeitog - Rooinek we nmust have pity of the stupid Silly Billy aka Omlett.   He thinks that joining a ruck is the same as makin a turnover at breakdown situations.   The difference is that De Allende made actual turnovers - 4 in the last two games - and Esterhuizen none.

Funny enough - there was no unbridled attacks on Du Toit after the Saturday game - Normal with Silly \Billy and Mozart.   For the info of Silly Billy and co Du Toit made TWO turnovers at breakdowns too,   remember how they praise Louw for making 3 turnovers  last year in all tests he played in and .how they demonized Du Toit.  But then what can one expect otherwise.

,