Ou Tokkie

Gone into hiding again.....what a prize pair of tits you are.

 No way Bster - but your selective recovery of posts is boring and since they do not reflect what you constantly wrote about the Lions and is selectively made is really boring and I do not like to discuss rugby issues with a rugby illiterate and a fool to boot.  

 Tokkie go into hiding? Never. Check this thread for proof. Oh wait.......

Yep he sure is running from that one.....in this case he claimed I made negative remarks about the Lions after they lost the 2016 Super rugby final. I have brought up every string in which I opined on that game and rather than admit his error, he creates a new, vague 'constantly wrote' standard. One of life's losers.

 "The Lions myth is over. Virtually every Lion has been discredited on the Intenational Stage.....they will finish mid pack. The Sharks will finish higher, but not make the playoffs."
Enough said

Not really Ou Tokkie. If you didn't have to crib that from Urinal you would realize that was written this year and not after the Super final in 16....schplottttttt!

 No - that was part of your gloating and hatred campaign over an extended period.   and has be3ebn the final contribution before you bolted and change sides be\cause you were being sillier and sillier every month.   
Nothing like changing your own mind about players and performance - but keeping up quoting othe3rs from posts as far back as 2012 - but hiding your old quotes.   While others based their comments on PERFORMANCE at the time -0 you based your BS on anything but performance.    

 Mike, Moz and I had a discussion about making more Lions into Boks for cohesive and form purposes where he clearly took both sides of the argument and discussed them. Making solid arguments both ways. He then said that overall it would probably be better to go for cohesion over individual skill and provided reasonss why he thought so. IE He backed the present Bok team...that's what I remember anyway.
We even spoke about exit strategies and though he is a "kick out of your 22" guy he still discussed it objectively. Which is why we are here, right?

...and that was early this year, long before the French series and even longer before the Lions SR final.  
One can hardly call it a hate campaign somebody entertains both sides of an argument in an unbiased way? Smart people think one way until there is sufficient evidence to think another way. To my mind many on this board have done exactly that as far as the Lions are concerned. Just look at the proposed Bok teams from last year and this year. You'll notice that more and more people have gone Lions heavy this year...on the basis of evidence. What's wrong with that?
Shall we discuss Jantjies some more? You know, since we are talking about doubt, bias and the rest? How about those who backed Strauss over Whitely last year? Who still backs Strauss over Whitely? Why...eish because evidence brah. Because EVIDENCE
Next year there will be new evidence and new ideas. Is that how the world works?
Anyway, we're probably all biased in some way.