FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Performance Assesment - SA "A" team:

Performance Assesment - SA "A" team:

Started by clevermike5 REPLIES1,094 VIEWS· 17 Jun 2017, 01:04
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
17 Jun 2017, 01:04
#1
17 Jun 2017, 01:04#1
There are some aspects that deserve mention and those are :
*   On the whole the scrumming was questionable and in some respects poor - especially when the subs came on.
*   There were also question marks about the replacement lock and essentially line out situation.   The line-outs became a mess when Jenkins came on from the bench and the earlier line-out dominance were eliminated, 
*   There was vey little cohesion in the loosie combination and the situation was made worse by ball handling problems.
*   Despite an occasional poor kicking - which put the team under pressure -  the halfbacks were good,   Lionel Cronje missed a number of kicks at goal -- but those were all difficult to convert because of the places where tries were scored. 
*   Vorster had a top class game and I still have doubts about why Jantjies so often make skip passes to Mapoe - when Vorster was playing for the Lions.   Matter of fact to my mind Vorster was the best player on display and one wonders how he can be kept out of the Springbok squad by the likes of Steyn and  Serfontein.  Problem was with De Jongh whose contribution to the backline was minimal - both in attack and defense.
*   The outside backs had good games in general.
Bearing in mind the above - the player ratings are as follows:-
15   Lwazi Mvovo                        =    9/10
14   Ruan Combrinck                   =    8/1013   Juan de Jongh                      =    4/1012  Harold Vorster                       =    9/10
11  Makazole Mapimpi                  =    7/10
10  Lionel Cronje                         =   7,5/10
  9  Jano Vermaak                        =    7/10
  8  Sikhumbuzo Notshe                =    6/10
  7  Ruan Ackermann                    =    6/10
  6  Uzair Cassiem                        =    5,5/10
  5  Ruan Botha                            =    7,5/10
  4  Andries Ferreira                      =    7/10
  3  Wilco Louw                             =    4,5/10  2  Franco Marais                         =    8/10
  1  Thomas du Toit                       =    4/10
Replacements :
16  Ramone Samuels                     =    5/10
17  Ox Nche                                  =    3,5/10
18  Trevor Nyakane                        =    2/10
19  Jason Jenkins                           =    3/10
20  Andisa Ntsila                            =    5/10
21  Dewaldt Duvenage                    =    5/10
22. Fred Zeilinga                            =    6/10
23  Francois Venter                         =   5,5/10                      





    

 . 



   
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,259 posts
17 Jun 2017, 01:30
#2
17 Jun 2017, 01:30#2
Having these B team games are good. It is effective for bringing players through into the 1st team with less risk. The Lions touring mid week games. 
The only problem is that they are rarely on Skye Sports
TH
TheTraditionalistPro4,003 posts
17 Jun 2017, 09:55
#3
17 Jun 2017, 09:55#3
 Not much into that grade thing.

Yet, some measure maybe.

A scale over 40 is better adjusted for anyone wanting to separate between shockling poor and shockling poor performances.

Most players must not be awarded more than 8 out of 40 (leaving room for discriminating between players)
DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
17 Jun 2017, 09:58
#4
17 Jun 2017, 09:58#4
 Wtf?
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
17 Jun 2017, 11:43
#5
17 Jun 2017, 11:43#5
 Can't really assess a team that gets together once in a while for a run out Mike. 

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
17 Jun 2017, 11:47
#6
17 Jun 2017, 11:47#6
 I see Traditionalist is yet again back on the board with his gibberish that nobody understands or gives a duck about.
Go on a I'Premia Lieg forum you bottom feeding inbred mouth breather.
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news