FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Performance Assessment of Springboks

Performance Assessment of Springboks

Started by clevermike32 REPLIES1,785 VIEWS· 18 Sept 2022, 00:45
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
18 Sept 2022, 00:45
#1
18 Sept 2022, 00:45#1

15    Le Roux                   6/10

14   Moodie                      5,5/10

13   kriel                          5,5/10

12   De Allende                 8,5/10

11   Mapimpi                    7/10

10   Wi llemse                  7/10

  9   Hendriks                   7,5/10

  8   Wiese                       7/10

  7    Mostert                    6/10

  6    Kolisis                      7/10

  5    De Jager                  8/10

  4    Etzebeth                  7/10

  3    Malherbe                  6,5/10

  2   Marx                          9/10

  1   Kitshoff                      6,5/10


                                                              

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,226 posts
18 Sept 2022, 03:50
#2
18 Sept 2022, 03:50#2

Hendriks was the best backline player. 2 quick-fire tries, to add to his overall consistent all-round game. 
Faff came on, and before long was lucky not to get a yellow card for tackling in the air. 
He also missed the try where another Bok got pinged for the high tackle roll out of desperation to protect the line. 

Delande had a good game, but still a few blunders. When he had an open try line, I am surprised he didn't just run flat out  - even just to gain territory. 

Concerned about the form of Malherbe, and Nykana. Bok scrum was solid, but we never dominated them as expected. 

Bok defence was good at first, but eventually they gave away 2 yellow cards to protect their line

The rolling maul went well as did the lineouts. Having Marx start was noticeably better than Dweeb

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
18 Sept 2022, 03:57
#3
18 Sept 2022, 03:57#3

Dud Allende rounded with ease, throwing inept passes…..unwilling to try to run in a clear try ….an 8.5. Gosh. He did some some decent things on defence and tractored away as usual. If he were a flank and he had made a few turnovers he might rate a 7.

BO
bobbok...Captain10,129 posts
18 Sept 2022, 04:40
#4
18 Sept 2022, 04:40#4

Player ratings: Butcherly Boks

https://rugby365.com/opini on/second-phase/player-ratings-butcherly-boks/

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
18 Sept 2022, 08:52
#5
18 Sept 2022, 08:52#5
Marx was easily MOM what a player Hendrikse is a great addition to the Boks - has a good rugby brain de Allende and Willemse were very good - who the hell is going to play 10 next game - please not Frans. I’d go with Libok All the forwards were good, except for Malherbe who was solid Nyakane is done he needs to be replaced by Thomas du Toit
KI
kingcornPro3,695 posts
18 Sept 2022, 09:16
#6
18 Sept 2022, 09:16#6

Nyakane will never be replaced by a superior props as he is blacks and it will lower the kpi

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
18 Sept 2022, 09:53
#7
18 Sept 2022, 09:53#7

soooo ... according to comrade mike ... de lindy was the 2nd best bok on the park ... and the weedy lood chalked up 3rd spot.

haaahaha!!

well I suppose we could have expected a little bias as both are favourites of his.

must say Im surprised he didnt give his friend malherbe a score closer to 10.

 

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
18 Sept 2022, 10:09
#8
18 Sept 2022, 10:09#8
Only Marx scoring higher than DDA on Mike’s assessment. He scores a try…basically that gives him an 8.5. Go on Mike, tell us the moments that warrant that rating. Timestamps please.
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
18 Sept 2022, 10:33
#9
18 Sept 2022, 10:33#9
How do we score the ref? Guy was penalising the Bargies off the park in the first half. He started well but after about 10 minutes i was complaining despite most of the penalties going the Bok’s way. One of those were as long as you hold the ball he’s gonna be blowing up the other team for without fail. Where do they find these guys? Last weeks ref said “You can’t attack the leg” and this week the ref had to be told to take his time and calm down.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
18 Sept 2022, 10:41
#10
18 Sept 2022, 10:41#10

The facts Are simple - I give credit to people scoring tries and then add it to the assessment for the rest of the game.     I do not give credit to players who make tackles - without looking at the quality of tackles  - in other words whether players were assisted in making tackles by others or the team or whether the tackles made are of people going forward when tackles are made or go backwards in tackles and that is where weakness of strength is concerned.    I also consider te role players play in ball protection and recovery at breakdown situation.

A player making ineffective or weak assisted tackles should get less credit for the tackles than those of stronger tackles.    That is where a player like Mostert fail.    I also penalize people for missed tackles and giving away of penalties and cards are to be heavily penalized.   The fact is that if De Allende did not score that try  the Springboks could easily have lost the game.   The way he scored was telling - three  Argentine players tried unsuccessfully to stop the try.   

The Springbok backline defense disintegrated with Steyn at flyhalf and the scoring of that last try of the Argentinians proved that.             

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
18 Sept 2022, 10:44
#11
18 Sept 2022, 10:44#11
Hey ignorant Dries are you telling us Lood was not good?
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
18 Sept 2022, 11:33
#12
18 Sept 2022, 11:33#12

um ... comrade ...  Im confused ... you seem to have double standards here.

if trys are what you need to score high with you ... then why did hendrikse only score a 7.5? surely he deserved at least a 9 going according to your silly score chart?

he was easily the best backline player in the game ... 2 trys and far more consistent than the blundering idiot de lindy.

why have you overlooked de lindys many blunders.

huh?

could it be favouritism perhaps?

are you saying that de lindy was on his way to a perfect 10 had he not made so many  stupid mistakes?

luckily this board has an edit facility ... I would use it if i were you. 

de lindy was worth a 6 ... nothing more.

as for lood .. your other favourite ... give him the 5 he deserves ... 

oh an for your info ... there is no such thing as a perfect score in any sport. 

the best score should have gone to marx and hendrikse ... a 7





PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
18 Sept 2022, 11:33
#13
18 Sept 2022, 11:33#13
As usual…the DDA fans are full of praise but fail to provide evidence. How is one to take you seriously, Mike? Let’s start here… How many tackles did DDA miss in yesterday’s game?
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
18 Sept 2022, 11:33
#14
18 Sept 2022, 11:33#14
As usual…the DDA fans are full of praise but fail to provide evidence. How is one to take you seriously, Mike? Let’s start here… How many tackles did DDA miss in yesterday’s game?
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
18 Sept 2022, 12:04
#15
18 Sept 2022, 12:04#15

Plum

The only prejudiced people  on site are those i gnoring real evidence.  De Allende missed 1 tackle and Kriel missed 2.    

So here are the attacking stats of De Allende yesterday:

0310641400

Just talking about prejudice - are you sure you are not prejudiced?   

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
18 Sept 2022, 15:51
#16
18 Sept 2022, 15:51#16
DA was very good yesterday They all make mistakes they all miss tackles He was excellent in breaking the advantage line virtually every time he carried - something he always does He is the best in the business when it comes to the trenches which is where modern test rugby is played Plum you are too rugby ignorant to work that out
MP
MpowerPro5,061 posts
18 Sept 2022, 16:43
#17
18 Sept 2022, 16:43#17

DDA is only good at 1 thing, crash and forming rucks.....and Boks was not up to standard..scrum was demolished after malherbe left....there is to many players in the Squad that is either there because of Political and sentimental reasons.....its BS and on top of that still the boring 1 Gameplan with a Pisio as head coach....stampkar party is all they have at the Moment....

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
18 Sept 2022, 17:22
#18
18 Sept 2022, 17:22#18

Subtract the intercept and Dud made 30 metres in 9  carries….the usual 3 metres and a cloud of dust. Mike mentions Allende missed 1 tackle….he doesn’t mention he made only 4. And what an embarrassing miss, rounded with ease.

KI
kingcornPro3,695 posts
18 Sept 2022, 17:42
#19
18 Sept 2022, 17:42#19

I will have watch this game again. The Boks came out half a sleep in the 2nd half and nearly through it away with dumb penalties. 

I wonder whether it is even worth these days committing a fowl and getting a yellow card when it end up being a penalty try and you end up going down to 14 or even 13. 

I thought that the ref was consistent on both sides. 

Why not try to defend and if they score, at least we still have 15 players. 

A good kick chase in the right part of the field can easily negate the try with the correct attack 

KI
kingcornPro3,695 posts
18 Sept 2022, 17:45
#20
18 Sept 2022, 17:45#20

Marx is playing on a next level. Another full game. 

Kolisi went quiet again. I'm with Mike that tackles alone are not good enough. 

However, dominant tackles that turned into a turnover or knock on should be highly appreciated. Or try saving tackles are equally important. 

Kwagga tackle was controversial. Way back when it would have stood but not sure if that guy would have score if he reached. 

But one thing that is for certain, the new tackle rules and strictness is actually enabling higher scoring games or am I wrong 

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
18 Sept 2022, 17:46
#21
18 Sept 2022, 17:46#21

Mozart

I answered a simple question when i refer to the 1 missed tackle.   Did De Allende attempted a tackle  "when he was rounded with ease"?    Yu know you are usually talking shit - hence the question.    By the way missed tackles always indicated an attempt to tackle and failed - so please deal with the answer objectively.    I did not mention the 4 tackles made - I answered a question             

What intercept are you talking about?  He actually made 2 when the Argentinians were attacking and save a nearly perfect scoring opportunity by them.   You missed that one - but one must accept that your prejudice is total and expect total BS as well.

I quoted the other stats and you ridiculously reduced the number of meters made by your own "estimate".    We know by now what that means - a total distortion as to what actually happened is clearly in evidence from your past descriptions of incidents in matches.

           

   

.  

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
18 Sept 2022, 18:56
#22
18 Sept 2022, 18:56#22
Lol the intercept from DDA was yet another classic. Firstly he has zero pace, so knows he won’t get far. Secondly, he has a few options. A) Hold the ball and carry it up the field. B) Put in a little grubber towards the Bargie try line, to likely win us a lineout in the Bargie 22…or perhaps a try if one of our chaps collect. …DDA chooses the option that requires a semblance of fundamental skill to execute. He totally messes it up. Like horribly. Ja, he scored a try. Similar to what he did against Wales many moons ago. Naturally this excuses him for messing up another 50 clear try scoring opportunities.m in future. Saffex, how about you back up your words with some actual evidence. The game is on youtube…give us the timestamps. Or just keep claiming that everyone that disagrees with you has no idea what they’re talking about. The guy that unironically calls DDA the best 12 in world rugby, telling everyone else they don’t know what they’re talking about.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
18 Sept 2022, 22:56
#23
18 Sept 2022, 22:56#23
Plum do you think I’m going to sit through the whole game just for you? I’m not going to waste my time trying to convince an ignorant fool about the merits of a player My evidence in a nutshell is virtually every time DA gets the ball But I’ll put this to your stupidity - the Boks are one of the best sides in the game and have been for some time. Inside centre is one of the most important positions on the field - do you really think the coaches would select a shit player at 12 and for such an extended period of time? The answer is fucking obvious. But you lot are so fucking stupid and hell bent on ignoring all the good he does and focus on all the negative Am I going to change your mind, no, are you going to change mine, no. I’ll stick with the coaches who invest in him as he is one of the best 12’s in the game, executing as per the Bok plan
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 Sept 2022, 00:06
#24
19 Sept 2022, 00:06#24
“ My evidence in a nutshell is virtually every time DA gets the ball” Well that’s just demonstrably untrue.
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
19 Sept 2022, 01:05
#25
19 Sept 2022, 01:05#25
Well I expect nothing less from your prejudicial ignorance
PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 Sept 2022, 01:22
#26
19 Sept 2022, 01:22#26
Well, in just this last game, off he top of my head…i can think of three terrible passes that he made. Two were terribly placed and one was down right embarrassing.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
19 Sept 2022, 04:58
#27
19 Sept 2022, 04:58#27

It was actually quite hilarious to see Dud’s confusion in open space. No doubt he was desperately looking for somebody to barge into….hahaha. Imagine playing outside Dud, knowing he is never going to pass you the ball…leaving you, the number 13, to a role of protecting the ball after Dud makes his 2 metre bursts.

PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 Sept 2022, 08:36
#28
19 Sept 2022, 08:36#28
…confusion, lack of pace, hilarious attempt at basketball style pass. Saffex’s ultimate evidence; He is being selected, therefore he must be good enough. He favours DDA so happily goes along with his selection as evidence to his quality. In fact, however thin, it’s the only evidence he provides. He doesn’t rate Mostert so claims that SA, a land brimming over with loosie talent, doesn’t have enough loosies to replace Mostert…hence his selection despite not being good enough. Go figure.
CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
19 Sept 2022, 09:05
#29
19 Sept 2022, 09:05#29

haaahaha!!

its good to see you trying to help Stupid Dave understand the game a little better, Plum.

You do know that its like farting against thunder though, right?

anyway ... i guess its the thought that counts.



PL
PlumCaptain21,007 posts
19 Sept 2022, 09:50
#30
19 Sept 2022, 09:50#30

12.  Damian de Allende – 7

Great on defence and with the ball in hand. Butchered a certain try early in the second half, but scored a crucial try with a power play late in the second half.

7.  Franco Mostert – 8

A bit over-eager at the breakdown, but his work at ruck and maul time can’t be ignored. He also made a match-high 17 tackles.


Sounds to me like DDA is messing up the back line while Mostert is keeping three people busy so that Marx can shine. 

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
19 Sept 2022, 10:54
#31
19 Sept 2022, 10:54#31

Duplicate

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
19 Sept 2022, 10:54
#32
19 Sept 2022, 10:54#32

Bullshit from Mozart as expected.   I saw the miss tackle and it has nothing to do with what the dim prejudiced BSter wrote on site.

As to the contribution of Plum - to he ruck contribution was imaginary - he did not  his normal in not going into rucks  - he did in this game - but it led to nothing - the Springboks gain zero from his so-called ruck contribution.    No turnovers made and only ball retention - more due to other players in the mauls.   He man is not physically strong  enough to make real contributions to rucks and his line-out work is also weak at the best of times.  Despite the 17 tackles Moster - in most of which he was assisted by other players - Mostert deserves  nothing more than 6,5/10

I am still waiting to see the butchered  try by De Alleede anyway.    We had so much loadshedding that I had not seen that segment of the game yet - but I hope Dave will write  something on the incident.       

When De Allende scored tries or assisted in scoring tries there is dead quiet on your part ord misrepresentations on the part of Mozart - so let leave the isue there.            

SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
19 Sept 2022, 12:33
#33
19 Sept 2022, 12:33#33
No Plum you dumb fuck I said virtually every time he gets the ball not every time - try wake up Like I said ignorant fools like yourself focus on the negatives I rate DA highly, there is no better 12 playing test rugby. His main role it to set up phases and he does that with distinction - by far the most productive centre in the game when carrying in traffic. When the opportunity presents itself he is very adept at attacking space. I don’t rate him because and nor is my evidence based on the fact that he is always selected - I brought that up to point out how stupid you look by virtue of the fact that one of the best sides in the game are not going to be selecting a poor 12 to achieve that status
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby