FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  PLAYER RATINGS: BLUNDER BOKS; Rugby 365

PLAYER RATINGS: BLUNDER BOKS; Rugby 365

Started by Just_win5 REPLIES463 VIEWS· 11 Jun 2016, 20:32
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
11 Jun 2016, 20:32
#1
11 Jun 2016, 20:32#1

OPINION: THE ALLISTER COETZEE ERA GOT OFF TO A DISASTROUS START - HIS SPRINGBOKS LOSING 20-26 TO A 14-MAN IRISH TEAM.

Not only was it the first time that Ireland won on South African soil, but it was a Bok performance to forget.

Lethargic and disinterested are just two words to describe a South African team that will take a lot of heat for this showing.

Jan de Koning rates the South African players:

15 Willie le Roux:
He looked to inject himself into the game, but it did not always come off and made far too many errors - running across the field.
5/10

14 Jon-Paul Pietersen:
Certainly a more lively performance than what we've seen in Super Rugby this year. He looked hungry, but also had a few blunders.
6/10

13 Lionel Mapoe:
Had a quiet game and his hands let him down at times. A day he would like to forget.
4/10

12 Damian de Allende:
He was guilty of the same unimaginative play that has plagued him all season at the Stormers.
5/10

11 Lwazi Mvovo:
Justified his selection with some great runs and was very effective when chasing the high kicks. One of the best Bok backs.
7/10

10 Pat Lambie:
Lasted just over 20 minutes before being taken out by CJ Stander and having to leave the field. Did nothing wrong in his brief stay, but not enough time to really make an impact.
6/10

9 Francois de Klerk:
Started his debut with an impressive tackle on a prop, driving the big man backwards. His service was crisp and accurate. Made a real impact.
8/10

8 Duane Vermeulen:
Looked rusty and made a few mistakes, but was physical - not his best Test.
5/10

7 Siyamthanda Kolisi:
A real workhorse and looked impressive with ball in hand - making some impressive yards.
6/10

6 Francois Louw:
Had a quiet game by his standard and it was a surprise he wasn't substituted earlier.
5/10

5 Lodewyk de Jager:
Worked hard, was very physical and had his moments. However, he disappeared at times.
5/10

4 Eben Etzebeth:
Was a real bruiser, but made far too many errors - physicality is not everything.
5/10

3 Frans Malherbe:
Looked keen and was strong in the scrums, but far too many silly penalties - a game to forget.
4/10

2 Adriaan Strauss (captain):
Was he even on the field> Not the example a captain should set.
4/10

1 Tendai Mtawarira:
Powerful scrumming and some impressive carries - the BEAST is back!
6/10

Replacements:

16 Mbongeni Mbonambi:
Not used.

17 Trevor Nyakane (on for Mtawarira, 59th min):
The scrum looked weaker when he came on and did not show up in general play either.
4/10

18 Julian Redelinghuys (on for Malherbe, 77th min):
Not enough time to be rated.

19 Pieter-Steph du Toit (on for De Jager, 56th min):
He was one of the few Springboks that showed energy and a desire to take on the Irish.
7/10

20 Warren Whiteley (on for Louw, 56th min):
He showed that he can perform on the Test arena. Maybe he should have started.
6/10

21 Rudy Paige (on for De Klerk, 69th min):
Not enough time to be rated.

22 Elton Jantjies (on for Lambie, 22nd min):
He did not let the team down and was one of the few backs who looked to create something in the mire of mediocrity that enveloped most of the backline.
7/10

23 Jesse Kriel (on for Mapoe, 69th min):
Not enough time to be rated.

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
11 Jun 2016, 20:35
#2
11 Jun 2016, 20:35#2
 Poor ratings with a few exceptions & that sums it up. 
TH
TheTraditionalistPro4,003 posts
11 Jun 2016, 20:41
#3
11 Jun 2016, 20:41#3
 The 8 out of 10 to the n 9 is astounding.

Considered the match events, noticeably, the red card that put the Irish squad down to 14, SA could afford waste in its game.

What SA could not afford, a certain part in the waste. It is not the high number of turn overs that killed that side, only a few of them. There were some critical misses in SA game th at ruined opportunities to drive the nail through the board.

Those are the critical failures. The n9 was involved in a high number of them all.
He shined when it did not matter and crumbled when it mattered.

For a player playing that position, the other way around might be a 8.
PA
PakieCaptain17,321 posts
12 Jun 2016, 00:29
#4
12 Jun 2016, 00:29#4
Lodewyk de Jager "worked hard, was very physical". Only problem (not highlighted by the media as usual) was, of course, that he kept having the ball ripped out of his arms by the Irish. I don't think the Boks can afford him to be "physical" if they value their possession. 
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
12 Jun 2016, 01:08
#5
12 Jun 2016, 01:08#5
 Lomp is useless against decent opposition....the ratings for Faf and Jantjies who totally wasted huge amounts of ball are a joke.
WA
WardadPro6,663 posts
12 Jun 2016, 01:26
#6
12 Jun 2016, 01:26#6
 Some were rubbishing Crotty and wee Feks and saying how Mapoe and De Allende were far superior .Well wadayouknow eh ? And I recall someone saying Etzebeth was waaay better than Retallick [ I'm looking at you Mikey !] Shameful display hope some of those who think they know what our coach should do  regarding selections might want to pull their heads in and get their own house in order first .It downgrades any ABs wins over the Boks  and I for one dont want anyone saying " oh but the Boks arent what they were though " if we beat them .Moz was right its worse than Japan .
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news