FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Player ratings: Sharks jou lekker ding

Player ratings: Sharks jou lekker ding

Started by Just_win10 REPLIES1,708 VIEWS· 27 Oct 2013, 01:03
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
27 Oct 2013, 01:03
#1
27 Oct 2013, 01:03#1
Rugby 365

The Sharks exacted the ultimate revenge on Western Province as they romped to a 33-19 victory in Saturday’s Currie Cup Final at Newlands.

The visitors rattled the previously unbeaten hosts when they got off to a perfect start and proceeded to outsmart and outmuscle the defending champions.

The Sharks were streets ahead with their tactical kicking and decision-making, which put Western Province under immense pressure, dominated the line-outs and won the collisions.

In doing so, they exorcised the demons of last year’s home Final defeat and condemned Western Province to the same heartache they experienced in 2012.

There were a number of stars for the Durban-side, but none shone brighter than Charl McLeod at scrumhalf and 21-year-old Pieter-Steph du Toit at No.5.      

Quintin van Jaarsveld rates the Sharks players.

15 SP Marais
Outstanding positional play, got good distance with his kicking out of hand and lethal on attack. He has a bright future ahead of him.
8/10

14 Odwa Ndungane

A calming presence at the back whose experience came to the fore in the Newlands pressure-cooker. Exemplary with his kick-chase and competing in the air.   
7/10

13 Louis Ludik

An absolute defensive wall. The fact that he’s a natural fullback made his resolute and aggressive defence at outside centre - against the Springbok captain - all the more impressive.
7.5/10

12 Frans Steyn

Did most of his damage on defence where he made some massive hits and secured a textbook penalty at the breakdown. Pure class.
8/10

11 Lwazi Mvovo

Used his pace to get around defenders and scrambled well on defence to get the Sharks out of some tricky situations.
7/10

10 Pat Lambie

Disappointing off the tee with three missed penalties and a missed conversion but other than that he was sublime. He took the responsibility upon himself and while he made one or two errors, he dictated terms. His kicking out of hand and restarts (bar one) were pinpoint accurate and he slotted two drop-goals  
8/10

9 Charl McLeod

A bona fide match winner! An influential figure in the thick of things from the get go. Great vision to snatch an intercept try and to score his second, quick to the ruck and varied his play expertly, with his attacking chips over the top causing problems for Province.
9/10

8 Keegan Daniel (captain)

Led his team well, was full of zest, played a good roaming role and was a good link between the forwards and backs with some good touches.
7.5/10

7 Willem Alberts

A human wrecking ball whose uncanny ability to smash over the gainline time and time again was invaluable. Also made some huge hits including one on Schalk Burger.
8/10

6 Marcell Coetzee

A tireless workrate, especially on defence where he tackled everything that moved, and showed impressive leg strength with ball in hand.
7.5/10

5 Pieter-Steph du Toit

Proved that he’s the next big thing in South Africa with his vigorous play on the biggest stage of his young career. Pivotal in the line-outs, exceptional at the restarts and strong with ball in hand.  
9/10

4 Peet Marais

Solid all-round and stole a line-out against the throw.
7/10

3 Jannie du Plessis

Although he conceded a scrum penalty, he formed part of a dominant Sharks scrum in the first half. Poor defence as highlighted by his missed tackle on Damian de Allende. Perhaps not 100 percent.
6/10

2 Bismarck du Plessis

Showed why he’s South Africa’s premier hooker with a telling all-round performance. Solid in both the scums and line-outs, abrasive on attack and defence and a nuisance on the deck.
8/10

1 Tendai Mtawarira

Maintained a solid workrate throughout the 80 minutes and held up his end of the scrum.
7.5/10

Replacements:

16 Kyle Cooper 
(on for B du Plessis, 80th minute)
Not enough time to be rated.

17 Wiehahn Herbst (on for J du Plessis, 44th minute)
Conceded a scrum penalty where the Sharks lost ascendency when Du Plessis went off.
6/10

18 Stephan Lewies 
(on for P Marais, 59th minute)
A satisfactory cameo in which he made no glaring mistakes.
6.5/10

19 Jacques Botes
 (on for Alberts, 75th minute)
Not enough time to be rated.

20 Cobus Reinach (on for McLeod, 65th minute)
Not enough time to be rated.

21 Fred Zeilinga
Not used.

22 Heimar Williams (on for Steyn, 72nd minute)
Not enough time to be rated.

 

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
27 Oct 2013, 01:04
#2
27 Oct 2013, 01:04#2
 Seems like no one had a bad game according to these ratings.  Are the credible ?
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
27 Oct 2013, 01:17
#3
27 Oct 2013, 01:17#3
 I'd notch them down by a point, but the Sharks played well. Relatively I'd say they are accurate. Note the big marks for Steyn and Alberts. Much talked about WP players like de Allende, Fourie and Kolisi were simply over powered.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
27 Oct 2013, 01:22
#4
27 Oct 2013, 01:22#4

Just-win

 

Van Jaarsveld is known for distorting ratings on player performances.  He has favourites who always receive abnormally high ratings and others who are downgraded.   The players that pulled it off for the Sharks were Lambie and Du Toit - they should for overall performances get 9.

 

The over-rated players are Francois Steyn - nothing more than 6 and same with Alberts.   The huge carries by Alberts comprised five carries - two of about 5 meters each and the other three not even a meter.  Four of those let to nothing other than a penalty resulting from one and one was a good carry where he retained the ball - a maul was formed and the attack carried on from there.   He made only a few tackles in both halves and none was really all that awesome.  Steyn similarly made one strong tackle on De Allende - but not so strong that WP lost possession of the ball - and he also missed a tackle on the same player.  Van Jaarsveld missed the pot with the penalty completely.  It resulted in a penalty for WP.

 

 

  

JW
Just_winCaptain18,570 posts
27 Oct 2013, 01:26
#5
27 Oct 2013, 01:26#5
 Clevermike, they did seem too good to be true.
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
27 Oct 2013, 03:23
#6
27 Oct 2013, 03:23#6
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
27 Oct 2013, 03:25
#7
27 Oct 2013, 03:25#7
Note JW...I don't agree with all these other ratings...but Steyn got an 8 as did Alberts. O nce again the OOM is alone in his denigration of these players.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
27 Oct 2013, 06:09
#8
27 Oct 2013, 06:09#8

Mozart

 

Pat Lambie rated lower than Alberts and Steyn - that really is a joke - that is why ratings by journalists are the worst norm for real evaluation of players.   If they favour players - the ratings are always high - whether they have done something or not.

 

The first time a player never mentioned once in the first half by the commentators receives an 8 for performance and one good tackle and a load of rubbish (like 2 penalties given away) get the same allocation.  That really is a joke in bad taste the epitome of jun k journalism.

MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
27 Oct 2013, 06:25
#9
27 Oct 2013, 06:25#9
Trouble is OOM you are a lone voice....everybody else thinks these guys were big today.  
SA
Saffolk Captain30,741 posts
27 Oct 2013, 14:43
#10
27 Oct 2013, 14:43#10
Frans Steyn was huge

de Allende a 5 is a laugh, he and Frans were the best centres on the park  
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
27 Oct 2013, 15:58
#11
27 Oct 2013, 15:58#11

Mozart

 

I do not care whether I am a lone voice.  I am not a journalist trying to sell his paper.  I am honest in what I see in the game - not dreaming up half truths and rubbish like you to discredit players you do not like.  

 

 

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news