Player ratings vs Oz
Nice ratings Moz. I thought Kriel was a 5.5 and Esterhozen too. Not much between the two.
PS. Mosterdt was a bit meh too.
Ratings look accurate. Jessica Kriel was pretty much the worst player on the field.
Australia seems to be a team low on confidence. Overall their sports teams have fallen apart and get torn apart by their media and fans. 15 years ago they had the best cricket team ever, and a rugby team that was as good as the All Blacks...
. dup
Mozart
What about the lack of ball carries and Esterhuizen losing ball possession twice and gave away two penalties as well. He was by some distance the poorest player on the field of play insofar as the Springboks are concerned.
So lets get real he was not worth anything above 4.5/10. If Kriel was 4,5/10 - Esterhhi zen was 3,5/10
Duplicate
What about the lack of ball carries
What would it have mattered? He made 70m carrying against Argentina and you rubbished it as insignificant.
Damian against Aus made 10 carries for 14m at 1.4m per carry beating 1.
Esterhuizen against Aus made 6 carries for 9m at 1.5m per carry beating 2.
Neither set the world alight.
You are very obviously campaigning against Esterhuizen because he threatens Damian's position in the side.
I mostly agree these summaries. I'd raise Esterhuizen and Faf a little higher though.
Lets get this clear - the three world rugby analysts have to defend their BS and now suddenly everything Esterhuizen did was classy.
His tackling was effective? that was crude defense of a player whose tackling was far too often so ineffective that it allowed for the cotin8taion of attacks through passing of the ball by the players being tackled.
Here we have the fools who always have a weird idea how to discredit players they hate at full blast -while writing total blown up stories without real substance on the useless Esterhuizen, I hope Earsmus see through the charade and find another center to replace that useless fake.
On the occasion that Esterhuizen did let the pass off, you must have neglected to note how far he advanced behind the ruck, catching them for a loss or, as you saw in these instances, forcing the Wallabies to play for negative gains. It was one of the reasons why the Wallabies were so lateral, they couldn't play through Esterhuizen. He'd wallop them everytime. Pollard added to the threat. Finally, a solid 10-12 pair that changes the way teams play.
Oh dear. On the ropes but still struggling on.
AO
Lets face facts - I deal with reality, you with pie in the sky dreams of no real value.
We'll see how you fare once my video comes out.
Even Houwing mentioned what I said in my summary - read the following:-
"Some trademark thumping hits, even if one or two tested the boundaries of lateness. One or two fumbles."
It was not one or two - more like 5 to 6 and he left out the two penalties Esterhuizen conceded.
So lets get your video going - the joke will be very funny - but remember to leave out the suspect play by Esterhuizen and try to avoid situations like the case where Mozart got caught lying he posted a video clip himself.
Duplicate
Duplicate
In tackling dumbo it is a waste of space and meaningless since the attack was not halted.


