FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Points for and against the Boks...14/15/16

Points for and against the Boks...14/15/16

Started by Mozart15 REPLIES320 VIEWS· 29 Sept 2016, 04:12
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
29 Sept 2016, 04:12
#1
29 Sept 2016, 04:12#1
2014  332 for....237 against = plus 95
2015  332 for....208  against = plus 124
2016  155 for....178. against = minus 23 (after 7 games)


This is a crude measure of how much the team has declined. But of course for those who would immediately argue that we haven't played as many games in 2016, unable to deal with proportionality. Here are the results after 7 games in 2015
2015  193 for....156 against = plus 37
And stunningly in 2014 after 7 games, with victories over Oz and NZ still to come
2014   203 for....137 against = plus 66
The truth is despite all the attempts to draw parallels with 2014 and 2015, the Boks have taken a huge lurch downwards. Now the argument appears to be Coetzee is worse than HM. How ironic is that?
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 Sept 2016, 04:55
#2
29 Sept 2016, 04:55#2

 Crude measure indeed.   The only measure is not to compare years during WC years when anything.    The teams played against in the WC is highly unlikely to play against other years.  So you ae trying to compare apples with pears and come up with bananas.
The only reasonable explanation is to compare apples with apples - in other words how did the Springboks compare with the same teams they played against in the last 15 months of Meyer's coaching and how are they performing against the same teams  they played against this year.   The situation is simple - but there were only three rounds played last year because of the rugby championship while this year there will be six rounds of those.  So lets take the first three matches played by the Springboks this year as a real indication of what happened. 
Ireland 
The Springboks played Ireland four times since November 2014 and the points differences were as follows:-
2014    =     For  -  14  Against  29  - Point Difference  -142016    =     For  -  71  Against  65  - Point Difference -   6
Definite Improvement on 2014 performance
Rugby Championship
2015    =     For  -  60  Against  87  - Point Difference  -  27    2016    =     For  -  66  Against  88  - Point Difference -   22
The difference year was the game against New Zealand.   New Zealand this year beat Australia and Argentina by wider points difference than they did SA - so they are in a class of their own.   SA beat Argentina in the home game - while they lost against Argentina last year in Durban by a wide margin.   So SA is basically omn par with Australia with what happened last year and showed a better result against Argentina.
Meyer was a clueless cad deficient coach - Coetzee is an atrocious coach.  That also impacts on team performances.
The huge lurch downwards is a stupid and prejudiced viewpoint of Mozart.  Fact is the Springboks were poor since November 2014 and remains so this year,   There was no real downward trend bar against New Zealand and all teams playing New Zealand this year suffered the same fate.  
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 Sept 2016, 04:55
#3
29 Sept 2016, 04:55#3

 Crude measure indeed.   The only measure is not to compare years during WC years when anything.    The teams played against in the WC is highly unlikely to play against other years.  So you ae trying to compare apples with pears and come up with bananas.
The only reasonable explanation is to compare apples with apples - in other words how did the Springboks compare with the same teams they played against in the last 15 months of Meyer's coaching and how are they performing against the same teams  they played against this year.   The situation is simple - but there were only three rounds played last year because of the rugby championship while this year there will be six rounds of those.  So lets take the first three matches played by the Springboks this year as a real indication of what happened. 
Ireland 
The Springboks played Ireland four times since November 2014 and the points differences were as follows:-
2014    =     For  -  14  Against  29  - Point Difference  -142016    =     For  -  71  Against  65  - Point Difference -   6
Definite Improvement on 2014 performance
Rugby Championship
2015    =     For  -  60  Against  87  - Point Difference  -  27    2016    =     For  -  66  Against  88  - Point Difference -   22
The difference year was the game against New Zealand.   New Zealand this year beat Australia and Argentina by wider points difference than they did SA - so they are in a class of their own.   SA beat Argentina in the home game - while they lost against Argentina last year in Durban by a wide margin.   So SA is basically omn par with Australia with what happened last year and showed a better result against Argentina.
Meyer was a clueless cad deficient coach - Coetzee is an atrocious coach.  That also impacts on team performances.
The huge lurch downwards is a stupid and prejudiced viewpoint of Mozart.  Fact is the Springboks were poor since November 2014 and remains so this year,   There was no real downward trend bar against New Zealand and all teams playing New Zealand this year suffered the same fate.  
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
29 Sept 2016, 05:23
#4
29 Sept 2016, 05:23#4
Where the blue blazes do you get these numbers for the Rugby Championship Tokkie are you growing weed again?
2015    =     For  -  60  Against  87  - Point Difference  -  27    2016    =     For  -  66  Against  88  - Point Difference -   22

Eina....the common teams between 2015 and 2016 so far are Argentina, NZ and Australia. And let's confine ourselves to the Rugby Cup....at the  WC by the way we beat NZ/Bargie 42 to 33.
2015 RC ....91 for vs. 100 against = minus 92016 RC ....84 for vs 113 against = minus 29
Same 4 contests, NZ, Oz, Bargie twice. 
Even by your lofty standards of incompetence this is a jewel.....get confused by the thumb again.....bwaaaaaaahahaha. What a bumbling plank
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 Sept 2016, 08:41
#5
29 Sept 2016, 08:41#5
 Mozart
You apparently has had a stupidity brain seizure again.    I took the first three games only - and clearly stated that as the Super Rugby last year contained only one game against each country.   The second Argentinian game last year was NOT part of the Championship and was in fact a preparatory game for the WC.
Please check your facts before you write garbage.       
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 Sept 2016, 08:41
#6
29 Sept 2016, 08:41#6
 Mozart
You apparently has had a stupidity brain seizure again.    I took the first three games only - and clearly stated that as the Super Rugby last year contained only one game against each country.   The second Argentinian game last year was NOT part of the Championship and was in fact a preparatory game for the WC.
Please check your facts before you write garbage.       
CE
CeradynePro9,374 posts
29 Sept 2016, 10:41
#7
29 Sept 2016, 10:41#7
 
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
29 Sept 2016, 14:49
#8
29 Sept 2016, 14:49#8
 Oh you conveniently took out the Bargie game we won.....how funny, why don't we just do Apples to Apples and include all matches against RC teams including those in the WC.
2015 all RC team matches......133 for to 133 against ....differential zero
2016 all RC team matches.......84 for to 113 against.....differential minus 29
Schplott!
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 Sept 2016, 15:36
#9
29 Sept 2016, 15:36#9
 Mozart
Don't be absurd.  I did not forget that game - but it was NOT part of the Rugby Championships.  I stick to those games who were part of the RC.  The Argentinians picked their "B" team for that game since it was just a preparatory game for the WC.   That is not the reason why I did not include the game - the real reason was I stuck to three RC games.  
Hell you are an absolutely crazy idiot.  Schpoltt!!!!!!
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 Sept 2016, 15:36
#10
29 Sept 2016, 15:36#10
 Mozart
Don't be absurd.  I did not forget that game - but it was NOT part of the Rugby Championships.  I stick to those games who were part of the RC.  The Argentinians picked their "B" team for that game since it was just a preparatory game for the WC.   That is not the reason why I did not include the game - the real reason was I stuck to three RC games.  
Hell you are an absolutely crazy idiot.  Schpoltt!!!!!!
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
29 Sept 2016, 15:41
#11
29 Sept 2016, 15:41#11
Well who knows what your motivation was....but no matter, it's obvious we were at parity against RC teams in 2015, and way short of parity this year. The point is proven.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 Sept 2016, 18:29
#12
29 Sept 2016, 18:29#12
 There is no point based on your rantings proven and it may be in your deluded min d - but is not factual.  The team last year was bad - this year the team was no better - no worse.   That point is proven. 
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 Sept 2016, 18:29
#13
29 Sept 2016, 18:29#13
 There is no point based on your rantings proven and it may be in your deluded min d - but is not factual.  The team last year was bad - this year the team was no better - no worse.   That point is proven. 
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
29 Sept 2016, 20:27
#14
29 Sept 2016, 20:27#14
 The team was bad....but the numbers say they are way better than this year. Stop whining and eat you crow Pervert.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
29 Sept 2016, 21:46
#15
29 Sept 2016, 21:46#15
 Mozart the time that you start thinking before writing garbage on the site is long overdue.  I agree with some of your points -nut the motivation given is grossly galsofied and not based on facts.  
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
30 Sept 2016, 01:38
#16
30 Sept 2016, 01:38#16
galsofied?
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news