Mozart has been shouting and screaming about Louw's two turnovers in the test against France - but kept totally quiet about the turnover leading to the try scored by Pollard, which in the end made the difference between wining or loosing the Scottish test - why should that be?
STFU!
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.
An empty barrel makes the most noise.
Make of that what you will.
X, don't step in it!
PS, he actually conceded that Louw made 2 turnovers against France...not?
Small victories X, small victories.
No honest assessment and discussion are what this Board is about.
No honest assessment and discussion are what this Board is about.
Obviously Mozart and AO is ignoring this th read - wonder why?
AO - Why don't you comment on this thr ead - too cowardly?
Like many of the topics under discussion recently, I find it boring. I have no need to ever feel threatened by you on any discussion.
I should firstly point out that Louw accumulated three turnovers in that test, not two.
Secondly, it was you who screamed when it was mentioned that Louw made a positive contribution against France. You protested every detail, even after Pakie gave you a good old one-two to the nose with more damning evidence against you. My advice is to give your vocal chords a rest. You're fast becoming the Ruby Rhod of Ruckers.
Ist das deutlich genug für dich? Super-grün, ja?
Poor buggers - they do not want to comment - because as per normal they have hit themselves in the foot with t heir misrepresentations.
Silence is better when fools do that.
In your case silence is a way of trying to prevent showing you up as a total fool and deceptive liar as well.
