FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  Pros and cons of drift and blitz defence in rugby

Pros and cons of drift and blitz defence in rugby

Started by sharkbok3 REPLIES1,109 VIEWS· 14 Nov 2017, 16:10
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,257 posts
14 Nov 2017, 16:10
#1
14 Nov 2017, 16:10#1

by Dan Cottrell in Defence

The blitz/r ush defence

This defence creates the biggest impacts and puts most pressure on the attacking team. It is fairly simple in that your team moves forward as fast as it can, cutting down space and time for the attack. Tackles are normally head-on, with many being double or team tackles.

Blitz defence pros

  • The attack has less time to make decisions.
  • The type of tackle can be very physical and knock the attack back.
  • The attack is caught behind the gain line and has to retreat to recycle the ball.
  • Psychologically, it can be an advantage to your team.

Blitz defence cons

  • If an attacker on an angled run beats the defence, they are immediately in space.
  • Defenders on a blitz defence have great difficulty adjusting their position and changing their angle of run.
  • It is very much a risk and reward style of defence.
  • It can be beaten with chip and grubber kicks.

The drift defence

This defensive strategy involves staying inside the attackers while pushing them out across the pitch and towards the touchline. Most tackles tend to be low around the legs and are side on.

Drift defence pros

  • The attacking team is always in sight.
  • Fewer defenders can defend against a greater number of attackers.
  • The touch line can be used as an extra defender.
  • As tackles tend to be low, the attacker is brought to ground quickly.

Drift defence cons

  • The attack has a longer time to make decisions.
  • As tackles tend to be low, the attacker can get their hands free and offload the ball.
  • Quick attackers can outpace defenders on the outside.
  • An inside pass to an attacker on an angle can be very effective in beating a drift defence.
sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,257 posts
14 Nov 2017, 16:11
#2
14 Nov 2017, 16:11#2
I am not sure what defence the Boks are playing, and neither does Delande.
Serfontein is limited on the attack, but his defence is good. 
Neinabaar applied the drift defence at the Stormers, but is apparently now using the rush/blitz defence
MO
MozartCaptain49,914 posts
15 Nov 2017, 03:43
#3
15 Nov 2017, 03:43#3
Allende has moved on from the drift defence ....to the whiffed defence. But Stepfontein was no great shakes either...13th most tackle misses among Super centres.
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
15 Nov 2017, 07:43
#4
15 Nov 2017, 07:43#4
 What defense was White using at the Sharks - when Steyn was no 32 on the list of centers in Super Rugby and the worst center defender in SA? 
— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news