My apologies to all, I thought I'd put this to bed by agreeing to disagree with the Fat Man....but Dumpy Dave just wont let go. So in an attempt to provide closure and remove this extraneous item, here we have an extract from a study by the UK University of Loughborough, Geography Department:
"It can be interpreted as the spearhead of a raft of increasingly connected English provincial cities with Newcastle , Liverpool and Southampton also particularly prominent but also including what are often considered the three major English provincial cities, Birmingham , Leeds and Manchester as well"
The full study can be found at http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/rb/rb203.html
Provincial isn't a term of use in England.....my foot!
Evidence has now been produced from the Oxford Dictionary, literature, the legal world and now the Geography Department of a UK University. You would think a Geography department would know the nature of the cities in the land. They call them provincial cities.
On the other side we have Dumpy Dave and his ever loyal "henchgirl" Becs, following the hilarious logic that a country without provinces can't have "provincial" cities. That English the most non literal of languages can't have a word with a non literal interpretation.
Well The GeographyDepartment at Loughborough has joined hands with Oscar Wilde and used the word "provincial" to describe English cities.Game over.


