FIXTURESNo upcoming fixtures — check back soon.
FORUM / RUGBY /  RE: RE: RE: Another expandsion of Super Rugby?

RE: RE: RE: Another expandsion of Super Rugby?

Started by clevermike13 REPLIES1,347 VIEWS· 15 May 2018, 07:13
SHAREXFACEBOOKWHATSAPPTELEGRAMREDDITLINKEDIN
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
15 May 2018, 07:13
#1
15 May 2018, 07:13#1

The following from News 24:-


"The New Zealand government has reportedly funded a feasibility study to determine if the Pacific Islands should get a Super Rugby team.   According to New Zealand’s Newshub website, both New Zealand Rugby (NZR) and the country’s government have worked on the proposal, meaning a united 'Pacific Force' is now close to reality.


The team would be made up of players from Fiji, Samoa and Tonga.


The feasibility study was carried out by Jeremy Curragh, a respected rugby commercial operative, and cost New Zealand taxpayers $80 000.


The report further states that the team would be based in Suva, Fiji but also play home games in Samoa, Tonga, Auckland and Sydney.


The team would be set up as an independent franchise and enter the competition in 2021, the report added.

A potential stumbling block for the proposal, according to the Stuff.co.nz website, is whether South African teams would be willing to play in Suva, given the fact that they already find travelling to Australia and New Zealand onerous.

This follows recent reports that an American team could be added to the competition, while there have also been reports that South African teams could exit to join leagues in Europe.


SANZAAR has denied these reports and last week stated that all its member unions were still on board and involved in an ongoing review to determine Super Rugby's future up to 2030.


This could work if NZ reduce their teams to four and let the United team envisaged to replace the Blues,   Despite the assurances by SA that it is committed to Sanzaar - it seems that NZ is planning for the eventuality should SA teams ll eave  the comp in 2021    

CL
CleanCutPro9,905 posts
15 May 2018, 09:07
#2
15 May 2018, 09:07#2

They already have representatives from all the South Pacific Islands playing at the highest level ... the All Blacks.

Maybe they're preparing additional players from these primitive islands to join the soon to be kiwi funded competition once the South African teams leave for the northern hemisphere.

It's good to be prepared. Then they can make up the rules as they go along.

Funny though ... the Kiwis push and shove to get rid of 2 of South Africa's teams, only to bring one of it's own into the mix.

Does the hypocrisy ever end with these people?.


WA
WardadPro6,663 posts
16 May 2018, 09:58
#3
16 May 2018, 09:58#3

A Pasifika team makes more sense than the Japanese team,even if it was based in Tokyo and included the Japanese players .

But Auckland is the biggest Pacific city withe a large PI base that would love a PI team.

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
16 May 2018, 10:38
#4
16 May 2018, 10:38#4

Wardad

I lie the idea - but whether Sanzaar will approve it apparently rest with the full Board and it ould eb difficult to get approval for it with New Zealand retaining their present 6 teams - especially in view of possible resistance  by SA on the issue of exta travelling.

The main reason would be that in the case of NZ they rarely are away forom playing in SA for more than two matches - but in the case of SA it normally entails a 4 week absence to play in NZ and Australia.   They also have factor in a game against the Sunwolves would could even make th absence 5 weeks..

This year in the case of NZ a number of franchises was in SA tio play only one game - their second game being in Argentina.   The other alternative would be to reduce the Aussie teams to three teams.

This indeed would be a hard sell so lets wait and see what happens.   .   

WA
WardadPro6,663 posts
16 May 2018, 11:02
#5
16 May 2018, 11:02#5

3 Aussie 5 saffa and Kiwi teams with a Pasifika/Japanese team and the Jags .Super -duper 15 .

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
16 May 2018, 11:29
#6
16 May 2018, 11:29#6

Wardad

Could be an interesting approach.   There ciuld still be three  conferences with the third one being 

# Aussie teams (Waratahs, Rebels and Reds)  

*   Pacific Islands - Japan team

*   Jaguares

 

CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
16 May 2018, 11:29
#7
16 May 2018, 11:29#7

Wardad

Could be an interesting approach.   There ciuld still be three  conferences with the third one being 

# Aussie teams (Waratahs, Rebels and Reds)  

*   Pacific Islands - Japan team

*   Jaguares

 

3K
3ku1Pro2,580 posts
16 May 2018, 13:10
#8
16 May 2018, 13:10#8

FYI NZRFU had nothing to do with two SA sides leaving super rugby. That was Sanzars joint decision. If the comp does gt a pacific side. I am not sure that is up to the NZRFU. They are proposing the idea. But its a Pacific Side.NZ are jjust trying to limit the onset of the China influence. If that makes them hypocrits then fine. Boy som fo you sa rugby fans are bitter about NZ rugby atm. Is it because were dominating? Sour Grapes much

BR
BrycyPro4,671 posts
16 May 2018, 14:55
#9
16 May 2018, 14:55#9

...i would like to see a Fijian team myself....They play a very exciting brand of rugby and just about every team seem to have them on the wing or you'll see them in the centres... but there are ever more Fijian loose forwards emerging also...very exciting times for Fiji as they already have a couple of teams playing in OZ...they also look like the strongest team in Oceania not to mention leading on the World Sevens circuit...Fiji are now in the top 10 in world rugby and only on the way up...Go Fiji

DB
DbDraadCaptain26,388 posts
16 May 2018, 14:58
#10
16 May 2018, 14:58#10

Yes Brycie Fiji has huge potential.

GE
generaltitPro3,164 posts
16 May 2018, 19:14
#11
16 May 2018, 19:14#11

There are real stars in Fiji, Tonga and Samoa even New Guinea (Papua) but they are so small be that as it may they certainly make up for it...huge accolade Fiji (a minute island) winning gold in Olympic Sevens.

Another great rugby nation is Georgia ( also a minute state of the previous USSR)...incidentally they went on a tour last year and played the lot without one loss...in fact away they beat both Tonga and Samoa and drew with Fiji... another sleeping giant/minnow in rugby...watch out in the Japan they might even break the pool stage.

sharkbok
sharkbokCaptain23,255 posts
17 May 2018, 02:44
#12
17 May 2018, 02:44#12
Reducing the teams has improved the rugby, so "expansion" could indicate less SA teams will be in the tournament in the future. (or perhaps none).  It might just be to fill the empty slots of leaving Sa teams
I would prefer to see Sa teams in SuperRugby continue- but get reduced to a Super12. Although the more teams a country has, the less international travelling they have. (Look at the Jaguars )
The SuperXV is better quality this year than last. Putting it back to a Super 12 could make the rugby even better. 
4 New Zealand teams (Auckland to be dropped)3 SA teams (possibly 2 teams)3 Australian Teams (They do not have forward depth)1 Argentina (Possibly 2 teams in the future)1 Sunwolves1 TBA. (Samoa, Fiji)
Having 3 teams would free up another team to play in Europe. (e.g. Sharks)- leaving only 3 teams in Super Rugby. (Or perhaps 2 teams, if 2 teams leave to join the Cheetas and Kings). The Kings are a disaster and perhaps should be dropped from Pro14- making way for another SA team. They have been through a major ideal with Cheeky Watson robbing them all and sundry blind.
The reduced global season may mean that some players may even be eligible for both tournaments- without getting totally overplayed. (If the tournaments run over different months)
CL
clevermikeCoach57,555 posts
17 May 2018, 04:15
#13
17 May 2018, 04:15#13

The current TV contract with Sanzaar runs uo till 2020 and nothing is going to change until 2021 - so what is going on now is mere guessing.   

I think that under certain conditions DSTV may remain interested - but with their major financial interests in China  - may want a Chinese Team involved.    Since they are basically funding the whole series they normally get their way.         

WA
WardadPro6,663 posts
17 May 2018, 05:33
#14
17 May 2018, 05:33#14

3 aussie teams plus a Fijian team with Samoan/Tongan props the Jags and 5 each from NZ and SA .It would keep it manageable and keep everyone happy .The spare Aussies could help bulk out their teams and maybe the Sunnies.

— END OF THREAD —

More from Rugby

More news